AEROSOL SPRAY GEOENGINEERING IS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION
AEROSOL SPRAY GEOENGINEERING IS AN ANIMAL RIGHTS VIOLATION
AEROSOL SPRAY GEOENGINEERING IS A ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS VIOLATION

Rutgers University professor Alan Robock warned that such experiments “could create disasters,” damaging the ozone layer and potentially altering the stratosphere by eliminating weather patterns such as the annual Asian monsoon rain season, which 2 billion people rely upon to water their crops and feed the population.

Who IS protecting the environment? If you belong to the Sierra Club, you should read this and this.

"WE ARE PART OF THE EARTH AND SHE IS PART OF US" - Chief Seattle

CLICK HERE FOR THE VIDEOS OF AIRCRAFT LAYING AEROSOL GEOENGINEERING
(FOR OUR FREE RADIO SANTA CRUZ LISTENERS)

WHY IS GEO-ENGINEERING SO DANGEROUS? Treaties prevent weather modification experiments from being used by one military against another country. Aerosol Spraying GA and FL.

Four things, at least, should be considered when humanity makes decisions. 1- How will this decision affect every generation that is to come after us? 2- Humility- do we understand that we understand less than we think we understand 3- Logic- am I peeing where I drink? 4-The past- see below Judging by the size of the plastic continents floating in the Pacific, it would have been a lot smarter for humanity not to become plastic glutons. So, too it can be argued that humanity should have ignored the bomb, terminator genes, DDT, Asbestos and thousands of other creations of short-sightedness. Too, it should be considered, that mankind ALMOST ALWAYS allows the military to hijack inventions and science. Industrial GEO-ENGINEERING, more so than any weapon in history, has the capability to destroy continents, oceans...the entire planet. Also of note, all the things created that since have been proven dangerous...have made their patent owners countless billions of dollars...the primary motivation to invent, especially when the invention is questionably immoral. Corporations, as we have learned, think without morals and have bottom-line motivations that emulate worship. Money drives every corporate emotion. Aerosol GEO-ENGINEERING is a FINITE source of money because it will kill us.

The Royal Society report on Geo-Engineering attempts to rate twelve potential approaches to engineering the climate by effectiveness, affordability, timeliness and SAFETY- and to graphically compare the approaches in terms of these criteria. The Stratospheric aerosol example rates considerably low in safety, yet is the most widely used program known to date. Tens of millions of people world-wide have discovered themselves the guinea pigs in ongoing aerosol programs, sometimes known as "chemtrails", when in actuality, the entire population is being exposed. Citizens in Shasta County California, have been testing surface water and air samples for years, as the skies above them are some of the most heavily sprayed in the world. Naysayers argue that the skies have always been full of lines, yet  mountains of video evidence prove otherwise, including video of military jets turning sprayers on and off and during passovers. Institute of Physics response to the Royal Report

British Royal Society Study Chairman Warns US Politicians About Geo-Engineering Shepherd's Testimony, including bios and working group. Congressional Committee on Science and Technology hearings on Geo-Engineering

"There is no longer enough environment left, of any kind, globally or nationally, for a thinking person to any longer be able to predict, with any degree of probability, let alone certainty, the survival of OUR species."
- Carl Sagan

GRL's mission is to disseminate concisely-written, high-impact research reports on major scientific advances in
Earth and planetary sciences. GRL is sponsored by AGU, a worldwide scientific community that
advances, through unselfish cooperation in research, the understanding of Earth and space for the benefit of humanity.

VOL. 36, L19703, doi:10.1029/2009GL039209, 2009.
"Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering"
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

Abstract [1] Injecting sulfate aerosol precursors into the stratosphere ...based on current technology Using existing U.S. military fighter and tanker planes	AP NEWS

MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE POINT TO AEROSOL DEPLOYMENT
The GRL letter has in it a sulphur compound to be used as the aerosol. But millions of people world-wide believe that at least the United States government has already deployed aerosol spraying, many believing that the aerosol is aluminum, barium and other contaminants. In northern California, Citizens have mobilized a public awareness campaign that involves dozens of water and air tests that show conclusively that the region is being bombarded with aluminum, barium, strontium, sulphur hexafluoride and others. In 2009, soil scientists and landowners began testing forest floors and gardens for pH changes and found the soils too alkaline (basic).

A large percentage of the over 40 generation believe that jet trails DONT MAKE clouds and have argued this when aerosol spraying evidence has been presented to them. Yet now this is EXACTLY WHAT IS CLAIMED BY the BBC and NASA

Francis Mangles,a retired USDA scientist, has been testing water, air and pH in the region for several years. His conclusions about Aluminum's relationship to PH levels and failing ecology are here. His conclusions about the increasing aluminum levels and the region's drought are here. Ongoing PH research into 2010 from Magles is here. Other citizens in the region, the Northern California Citizens for Clear Air fought hard and lost with local government...to duplicate the tests, which showed thousands of times higher than normal levels of aluminum. Both barium and strontium have been found in their tests as well. Here (front and back) is the ad they put into the local paper.

The following is a correspondance between Mangles and a scientist attempting to shrug off Citizen's tests:

(NAME) "......would you care to explain the attached EPA lab reports( one, two, three), a few of hundreds?  I will gladly shut up if you can adequately explain how these reports are so common all over the West now.  Do explain the source of the Barium, Strontium, and Aluminum  that simultaneously peaks in accordance with the amount of contrails the previous week.  Of course Waldope Herger our infallible congressman says the EPA lab is lying and agrees with you entirely."

Francis Mangels
Retired USDA scientist

3-16-10 REPORT:What’s Killing the Great Forests of the American West?

Austism is on the rise and now it is linked to Aluminum. Activists insist that aluminum in Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering that is ALREADY DEPLOYED is causing this. Alzheimers, on the rise now considered an epidemic, is linked to Aluminum

Sulphates in the stratosphere
When volcanoes erupt they release sulphates which are known to have a cooling effect on global temperatures by reflecting solar energy back into space. The eruption of Mount Tambora in 1815 led to the ‘year without summer’. Planet-wide episodes of cooling also followed the eruptions of El Chichón (1982) and Mt. Pinatubo (1991) Some
scientists are therefore proposing to increase the level of sulphates in the atmosphere to simulate the effect of a volcanic
eruption. Methods for getting the sulphur up to the stratosphere include using tens of thousands of balloons,
using naval cannons, big pipes or specially designed aircraft. Another suggestion is to increase the sulphate
emissions of conventional aircraft by using fuel with a higher sulphur content. It is estimated that five million tonnes
of sulphur would be needed each year to compensate for a doubling of carbon dioxide concentrations. Costs are estimated
at around $25-50bn (£12.5-25bn) a year.
Beyond the overarching problems with albedo enhancement as a solution to climate change, there are a number of
significant issues with this particular approach. It is essentially fighting pollution with more pollution. Sulphate pollution
causes a thinning of the earth’s ozone layer. The sulphates will eventually come back down to earth, with an unknown
impact on ecosystems. Governments have been working to reduce emissions of sulphates because they cause acid
rain. Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen, who advocated research into sulphate aerosols as a last ditch solution to global
warming, predicted around half a million deaths as a result of particulate pollution. New studies have shown that the
historic droughts in the Sahel region of Africa that caused widespread famine in the 1970s and 80s were caused in
part by industrial emissions of sulphates in the West. The clean air acts that reduced this pollution helped trigger the
return of the rain to the Sahel. It is impossible to predict which regions would be affected by this climate manipulation
or how.

TWO OF THE TOP GEOENGINEERING SCIENTISTS
Ken Caldeira and David Keith

First of all, Caldeira and Keith APPEAR TO BE DECEIVING US
A scientist named Robock (Rutgers), who works with David Keith (see below) admits the scientists know that the only experimentation that will work is full scale use, would be difficult, if not impossible to stop and take at least 10 years AT LARGE SCALE to know if it was technologically working.

Why wouldn't these scientists be protesting government inaction on greenhouse gas emission reductions with the EMOTION AND CLARITY WARRANTED? Why are they not declaring with the clarity and emotion befitting the circumstances? While appearing on their discovery channel shows, in their articles and interviews, why are they not telling us that THEY believe this matter is SO critical to Life, that no industry, political party ...virtually NO OBSTACLE should come between humanity and lowering emissions? Wouldn't everyone agree that our atmosphere is more important than our jobs, our stocks and our patriotism? Keith's position on the matter dived further into question when he said outside the AAAS San Diego meeting that he "flies everywhere" (his words). This is too similar to Al Gore saying WE should all reduce emissions while being driven in limos and owning a ridiculously inefficient mansion. If Keith cares about our children why is he not finding alternative methods of transportation?

Would we really re-engineer our atmosphere BEFORE we gave up Coca Cola,Chevron and Monsanto? Would we divert the course of our Children's future towards CERTAIN UNCERTAINTY because the stock market MUST GO ON?

Its an excuse...a scapegoat, when these scientists say we should not deploy but do NOT ACT LIKE IT.

IF we are in grave danger, one that warrants geoengineering? Why wouldn't they be getting arrested like James Hanson? (NASA, and his stance on the urgency to stop the coal industry) Why would they DEPLOY experimentation (which is DEPLOYMENT) without first MAKING CLEAR to mankind that industry and government are criminal in their inaction to halt greenhouse gas emissions?

Historically, James Fleming pointed out, people have been fantasizing about manipulating the atmosphere for decades. They fall into two categories: “commercial charlatans and serious but deluded scientists.” -SmithsonianMag

DAVID KEITH, of the University of Calgary is also funded in part by Bill Gates and works with Ken Caldeira. They have been Bill Gate's CLIMATE ADVISOR for years. He also declines to comment on his patents/funding. This from the Calgary Herald- "On the same day Keith’s report was released by the science journal Nature, another science publication reported that at least part of Keith’s research on geoengineering the planet’s atmosphere is being funded by billionaire and Microsoft Corp. chairman Bill Gates. In an interview Wednesday, Keith declined to comment on the report but added he would not deny it either." Contact David Keith Earth Sciences, ES 602 University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 keith@ucalgary.ca Campus Map

Its difficult to ever call these men "scientists" when their solutions are economic and not scientific. A common theme in their scheme is that it may cost a hundred times less to pollute the stratosphere then to grow up and become a mature society that respects the planet that provides everything for us. Its easier, CHEAPER, to pollute than to stop fouling the very air that we breath. What is scientific about polluting the atmosphere to cool the planet while destroying it? Nothing. In fact, Caldeira and Keith's aerosol solution is close to IDENTICAL to the conspiracy theories of so called chemtrail activists, and a program that Caldeira says doesn't exist (How scientific are men who cannot correctly identify a condensation trail from a cloud that was created from jet trails ). How convenient it doesn't exist YET he wants to start a program that is almost identical to it.

David Keith said outside the AAAS meeting in San Diego that he would be happy to look at citizen tests showing Aluminum, Barium and other elements are showing up in our water, air and soil. Keith also said that children should have a say whether geoengineering should be deployed and that democracy should be used...he suggested a referendum. He went on to say that NOT EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE A SAY and sited that torture and nuclear weapons are examples of things kept secret for "the better good". This statement suggests he supports torture but perhaps he will clarify that.

Two sides to his mouth. Everyone, including kids should have a say, AND somethings are better kept secret for the better good....like torture and nuclear weapons. HUH?

MORE ON CALDEIRA

Caldeira has been (and many believe STILL IS) VERY MUCH INVOLVED IN MILITARY WEAPONS CONCEPTIONS, although his comments below a San Francisco Examiner article, tried to steer the reader from those facts. His comment in the examiner:

Caldeira (NOW): I do not have and never have had any relationship, financial or otherwise, with any US government spraying program. Furthermore, I do not believe there is a US government spraying program aimed at climate intervention. (Do you really believe the Bush Administration cared enough about climate change to risk political capital by engaging in secret activities to diminish climate change risk?)

We suspect Caldeira may be DEFLECTING his knowledge of what is really going on with HIS answers.

NOW, here is his comments just a couple of years ago. Here is the mp3 link to the actual interview, along with other scientists, made by New York Skywatch Journalist Geoff Brady:

Caldeira (THEN): I used to work at Lawrence Livermore Lab where we all participated in a meeting. Where we sat around the room thinking of ways to manipulate geophysical systems to use it as a weapon. That means could you somehow interfere with the earth's functioning in a way that you could use it as a military weapon. Could you change climate, what could you do to manipulate the earth's physical system. Some of the ideas were, could we blow up hydrogen bombs underwater or offshore to make a tidal wave that would go over a city. The result was isn't it easier to drop the hydrogen bomb on the city. Now, you could imagine putting pathogens in a cloud. Let the cloud go over somewhere and rain down on your enemy, do chemical or germ warfare. That may work on something as big as the former Soviet Union, where you could be pretty sure that in a few days that cloud would rain out.

Notice how he says there is no spray program for climate intervention. IS THIS A PLAY on words? Obviously such a program WOULD BE a capable weapons program, as stated in his own words. He ALREADY ADMITTED to having a connection with a think tank (Lawrence Livermore) for the branch of government that wages war and makes secret weapons. IS HE splitting the truth and forwarding a DECEPTION? Caldeira is a weapons innovator by his own words and was (and many believe still is) PAID TO DO SO BY YOUR TAX DOLLARS.

Caldeira MODIFYs his statement YET AGAIN, this according to journalist Eli Kintish (an admitted friend of Caldeira) of ScienceNow, an AAAS owned media journal:

“I worked at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory with Edward Teller and Lowell Wood,” Caldiera said later, citing the father of the H-Bomb and his acolyte. He feared the use of geoengineering as a weapon, not schemed to develop it as one (Kintish's speculation) . “They couldn’t get money for this work—I doubt anyone else can.”

On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 (2.3 trillion) in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for.

Ken may have a problem doubting, casting doubt on his abilities.

THIS is the man essentially saying "TRUST ME".



Again, Here is what the American Association for the Advancement of Science, where Caldeira was a presenter, says about YOU, the civilian, the Citizen, the human being:

"...people make judgments based primarily on their values, belief systems, world views, and emotions. Facts play a much more minor role. This gap cannot be bridged by loading the public with facts, or trying to make the public more science literate. How should scientists deal with this awkward reality?"
- AAAS summary of seminar at annual meeting where Caldeira is a speaker

Exploring Caldeira's Livermore employment it is impossible to not be alerted to Lowell Wood and Edward Teller. Woods and Caldeira are consultants to BILL GATES. Caldeira also shares a geoengineering patent with BILL GATES. According to Rolling Stone Magazine, LOWELL WOOD IS THE PENTATON's TOP WEAPONEER.

		Lowell Wood and Edward Teller Teller Invented the Hydrogen Bomb

Lowell Wood is an astrophysicist who worked with Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb. A member of the Director’s Technical Staff at the University of California’s Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Lowell is also a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, and he serves on the board of directors of the Hertz Foundation.

The above paragraph is from Bill Gate's own webpage, and states that Woods is a contributor to his (Gate's) work along with Caldeira.

Teller was also the founder of Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, where Caldeira (still?) worked on ways to manipulate geophysical systems to use it as a weapon (his words).

According to Wikipedia (Teller) "In his later years he became especially known for his advocacy of controversial technological solutions to both military and civilian problems, including a plan to excavate an artificial harbor in Alaska using thermonuclear explosives."

Going further with wikipedia, and connecting ideology and (LOWELL) corruption to current issues:

"In the 1980s, Teller began a strong campaign for what was later called the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), derided by critics as "Star Wars," the concept of using ground and satellite-based lasers, particle beams and missiles to destroy incoming Soviet ICBMs. Teller lobbied with government agencies—and got the sanction of President Ronald Reagan—for his plan to develop a system using elaborate satellites which used atomic weapons to fire X-ray lasers at incoming missiles— as part of a broader scientific research program into defenses against nuclear weapons. However, scandal erupted when Teller (and his associate Lowell Wood) were accused of deliberately overselling the program and perhaps had encouraged the dismissal of a laboratory director (Roy Woodruff) who had attempted to correct the error.[38] His claims led to a joke which circulated in the scientific community, that a new unit of unfounded optimism was designated as the teller; one teller was so large that most events had to be measured in nanotellers or picotellers. Many prominent scientists argued that the system was futile. Bethe, along with IBM physicist Richard Garwin and Cornell University colleague Kurt Gottfried, wrote an article in Scientific American which analyzed the system and concluded that any putative enemy could disable such a system by the use of suitable decoys. The project's funding was eventually scaled back."

Teller had claimed he didnt want the bomb used on humans but first demonstrated to the Japanese. But since then, THAT was proved false. Again, Wikipedia:

"In the 1970s, a letter of Teller to Leo Szilard emerged, dated July 2, 1945: "Our only hope is in getting the facts of our results before the people. This might help convince everybody the next war would be fatal. For this purpose, actual combat-use might even be the best thing."

The question of whether Livermore scientists would go as far as using weapons of mass destruction on human populations was already answered on July 2, 1945.

MORE Who's Who of Elite Geo-Engineers (profiteering)
Bill Gates- Hurricane Supression
John Latham and Stephen Salter-Cooling by increasing the reflectivity of marine clouds
Bill Gates and Ken Caldeira seek GE Patent together
Hughes Aircraft/Chang

2008 GE Patent Filers:
Ken Caldeira
Bill Gates
John Latham
Stephen Salter

Here, Caldeira declines to comment on his patents

The site JetLib explains that Gate's funding includes aerosol spraying. Microsoft is quickly becoming the internet cop, jury and executioner, as well as sending all your windows keystrokes and data back to microsoft!

The Gates /Caldeira patent the patents describe methods “not limited to atmospheric management, weather management, hurricane suppression, hurricane prevention, hurricane intensity modulation, hurricane deflection” to manage storms.

According to Daemon News, Caldeira also works for Intellectual Ventures, an investment and intellectual property licensing company founded by Nathan Myhrvold, the former chief technology officer at Microsoft. Myhrvold and Gates have funded a company called TerraPower, which is trying to develop a breakthrough in nuclear power. According to Intellecutal Ventures, they are " built on the belief that combining capitalism and invention will benefit the world with more and better inventions as well as create financial rewards for investors".

"We will see ...mist ...as a warning ...telling us people of all colour must unite and arise for survival, and that we must uncover the cause of our dilemmas." Warning given by the late elder Dan Evehema, of Hotevilla, Arizona, Hopi Nation

MSNBC-Obama's science chief eyes drastic climate steps Obama Administration- Geoengineering is "On the Table" FOX NEWS-Obama Science Advisor Advises Shooting Soot and Pollution Particles Into the Air In December of 2002: GEOENGINEERING TOO RISKY -LAWRENCE LIVERMORE A Lawrence Livermore press release warns, “There are many reasons why geoengineering is not a preferred option for climate stabilization.” These proscriptions include risks of global “system failure” and the “unpredictable responses” of Earth's climate system to large-scale human intervention. Subcommittee Examines Geoengineering Strategies and Hazards

In February 1998, DURING THE CLINTON/GORE ADMINISTRATION, the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program. The Committee’s “Motion for Resolution” submitted to the European Parliament:

“Considers HAARP… by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body…; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration… to give evidence to the public hearing …into the environmental and public risks [of] the HAARP program.”

THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE

The Council on Foreign Relations may be the most influential and dangerous body of elites on the planet.
Here is what they have published on Geoengineering
:
The Geoengineering Option
Unilateral Geoengineering
Geoengineering- The last resort against global warming?
Geoengineering Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering

GeoEngineering Watch Internet Public Service Announcement

PRIVACY ENABLED
For a 59 Second Radio Spot of this, CLICK HERE

OWNING THE WEATHER
An Award-Winning Documentary (see the trailer)

Scientists are into this because of hubris, and NOT but because of fear.

At a panel discussion after the screening of Owning the Weather, the film producer, Blackstock, described geoengineering as "terrifying." But as he quickly added, "scientists are not into this because of hubris, but because of fear." Blackstock went on to make the case that there must be international regulations firmly in place before any rogue nation, or individual, attempts a geoengineering intervention of any significant scale.

More from the producers of "Owning the Weather"
The Climate Engineers
When Will Geo-Engineering Tip?
Can a Million Tons of Sulphur Combat Climate Change?
How to Cool the Planet

Global Sunscreen Won’t Save Corals
Emergency plans to counteract global warming by artificially shading the Earth from incoming sunlight might lower the planet’s temperature a few degrees, but such “geoengineering” solutions would do little to stop the acidification of the world oceans that threatens coral reefs...