web analytics

Norwegian study: Biological Effects Of Geoengineering Fallout On Plant Life.


The study below was prepared by Norwegian researchers. It helps to document some of the extremely negative effects of the ongoing SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) and SRM (solar radiation management) programs. There are now no “organic” sources for food. All has been tainted with the toxic metals and chemicals being emitted by the global spray programs. Some of the toxic elements we are now forced to consume in our food have been identified, others are likely as of yet unknown.

[Link do downloadable PDF of this article]——>BaSrTiO3_cell_communication.pdf<——–

Harald Kautz-Vella:

Theoretical and experimentaly proven negative effects of (Ba, Srx) TiO3 nano particles on plant growth (first draft)

Regarding the chemical & physical (Ba, Srx) TiO3 quality designated as aerosols in global weather engineering concepts


Theoretical implications as well as experimental proof show that (Ba, Srx) TiO3 nano particles <100 nm as they are discussed as one component for cloud seeding in global weather modification patents would cause harm to plants by

  • interrupting cell communication at the 230 nm UV absorption line by absorbing the weak intracellular UV signals responsible to trigger cell division.
  • irradiating the plant DNA with high energy ultraviolet light of 230 nm stored as excited states in the Barium/Strontium nuclides. This excitation is caused by exposure to cosmic radiation in clouds. The high-energy photons stored can be released by non-linear optical interaction when a weak longitudinal UV photon of same wave length (Bio-photon) hits a nanoparticle. The excited state oft the nuclides then discharges into a time reversed replica wave precisely flowing back to the DNA exposing it to a UV photon impact of same wave length but much higher energy.
  • dis-balancing the cell potential when triggered by terrestrial EMF, microwave or radar-radiation by releasing free electrons during an induced change of crystal geometry following their piezoelectric properties, making the plants vulnerable to the attack of fungi.

The complex interaction of these three theoretically possible forms of damage is not fully understood. However the over all effect on plants could be experimentally confirmed showing a lethal dosis for plants of aprox. 35 mg (Ba, Srx) TiO2 per kg dried organic matter depending on plant type and other external variables (both by lab analysis and) outdoor studies.

Due to the fact that:

  • the amount of (Ba, Srx) TiO2 in g per ha and year projected for geo-engeneering purposes is much higher then the experimentally evaluated lethal dosis for plants in g/ha and additionally
  • the non-soluability of these crystalls would lead to a continuous accumulation of these particles in the biosphere

launching these projects would be a threat for the biosystems of the world which sooner or later would leed to a total destruction of natural biotopes and agricultural crop in fallout regions.

1.             Introduction

The human mind is trained to think in macroskopic sizes, which can lead to wrong decisions when it comes to exposing nature to nano particles. The smaller the particles, the higher the surface/volume ratio becomes. We are technically able to produce (Ba, Srx) TiO3 particles with a surface of 2.500 square meters per gram. For the following estimations this value is going to be used for calculations.

Theoretically an amount of 300 tons of that material would be anough to build a 1 particle thick layer to completely optically cover a country of the size of Germany. To bring out these particles as an aerosol would take 30 flights with a Boing 737 only.

This simple calculation is what is tempting about these materials when it comes to geo-engineering. Whether it is for cloud seeding to controll climate change, or to protect industrial aereas from sun flaires by forming a plasma-shield in the upper atmosphere utilizing the piezoelectric propperties of this material – the benefits can be great.  Additionally Barium, the non-radioactive Strontium isotopes 85, 86, 87 and 88 and Titan as well as their oxides can be regarded as chemically non-toxic.

There is irrefutable evidence that non-authorized aerosol spraying has been conducted in the past. Camera footage of spraying military planes, of persistent contrails at temperatures of -35 and a relative humidity of 40%, bear whiteness of people involved up to the former leader of the FBI, and chemical analysis showing the footage of Barium/Strontium Titinate in the chemical analysis of rainwater, soil and plant samples in most of the industrialized countries. However this paper is not to discuss the existance or legitimicy of past action, it is to discuss the effects of future activities as they are currently carried into the public discussion for example by the German ”Umwelt Bundesamt” in the brochure ”Geo-Engeneering. Wirksamer Klimaschutz oder Grössenwahn. Methode. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen. Umweltpolitische Fragen. Berlin, April 2011.”

Not taken into consideration in these public discussions are the optical and electrophysical properties of these materials, which are outstanding, and their possible interaction with bio-systems.

The purpose of this paper is to bring these considerations into debate.

Samples of dying plants or plants which significantly were being slowed down in growth rate from all over the world showed in lab analysis repeatedly high values of Barium, Strontium and Titan in a relative molar concentration that points to 35 mg nano-crystaline Barium/Strontium Titinate per kg dried organic matter at the moment of plant death. Although there is no biochemical explanation for any damage done to the plant the correlation of damage and the Barium, Strontium and Titan concentrations is significant enough to take alternative mechanisms of particle-plant interaction into consideration then the known chemical ones. Knowing that nano particles of the size projected in geo-engineering patents can be absorbed by plants as a hole, and knowing the outstanding properties of these materials, these alternative ways of interaction might be optical and/or electro-physical in nature.

2.             Claims

2.1.          Optical interruption of cell communication

In the concept of bio-photons the DNA molecules of a plant send out a interfering patterns of bidirectional week UV emissions who are all together forming a holographic picture that acts as a blueprint for the plant, leading to cell divisions at the points where there is no replica wave send back from a receiving DNA-molecule because of a ”missing” cell. The mono-directional and therefore visible wave will trigger cell division in a neighboring cell to close the gap. Complete plants would have their inter-cellular light exchange entirely in the annihilated state of UV waves and their time reversed replica waves, injured plants or growth-active areas like the cambium should show an excess of mono-directional UV waves triggering cell division.

A simplified form of this concept is used in holographic screening technologies using lasers as ”transmitting DNA” and the same type of piezoelectric nano-crystals as ”answering DNA” being able to project high resolution 3D holograms.

The absorption line of Barium/Strontium Titinate nano particles has its maximum at a wave length of 250nm, absorbing 90% of the light passing the crystal/

The intracellular communication that is responsible to trigger cell division is carried out by weak photons of a wave length of 260 nm.

Putting these two findings together shows that inserting piezo-electric particles of this quality should heavily interfere with cell communication – hence the DNA and the particles are using the same wavelength and the same electromagnetic wave form to communicate.

To understand the quantitative relationship between this special type of opacity the nano particles create and the harm done to the plants it is useful to calculate the optical density of the particles in the plant in the moment of their death.

Estimating a concentration of 35 mg/kg dry organic matter like measured in Norwegian loan as well as in the bark of dying Californian trees one can say that

35 mg ≈ 87,5 m2 particle surface  ≈  21,875 m2 optical surface

Estimating that 1 kg dried organic matter equals a volume of 3 l = 0,003 m3 living organic matter opacity will be reached on a optical distance of 0,1311 mm which is in the range of cell size.

In the moment of the plants death, containing 35 mg (Ba, Srx) TiO2, the optical density of the nano-particles is high enough to even interrupt the communication of directly neighboring cells!


2.2.          Irradiation of plant DNA with high energy UV light

Understanding the concept of bio-photons as a pattern of bi-directional waves and their time reversed replica waves sent and received by DNA-molecules, involving alien photo-active elements could mean changing the strength of the photons involved from weak to not so weak.

It is known that particles in clouds can be excited by incoming cosmic radiation and later release this radiation in form of gamma rays. This release of gamma rays can happen spontaneously or be triggered by an incoming photon.

Visualizing this possibility it becomes obvious that the involvement of excited nuclides into a bio-photon exchange could lead to a release of stored gamma quants as time reversed replica waves being directly focused back onto the DNA that emitted the triggering bio photon.

This negentropic process redirecting high amounts of energy back onto a weak triggering source actually is the main characteristic of non-linear optical systems. For full understanding please read the referenced articles.////////.

High energy UV radiation is known to be the main source for plant DNA damage. Thus a deposit of optically excited aerosols could lead to DNA damage by released UV quants.


2.3.          Disbalancing of cell potential


The immune system of all cells follows a highly defined curve of electromagnetic cell potentials, with defined potential differences between cell-core and the inner membrane surface as well as between the inner and outer cell membrane surface. Any alteration of these cell potentials weakens the ”immune system” by disturbing the equilibrium of oxidant and antioxidant processes.

Barium Strontium Titinate as a piezoelectric substance changes its crystal geometry when exposed to external electromagnetic fields. Any change in crystalographic structure is accompanied by a release of electrons.

As an aerosol in the atmosphere this effect can be used to switch clouds on and off by applying electromagnetic fields as used by HAARP and ICECAT devices or other microwave radiating antenna systems by altering the crystalographic structure which is leading to free current turning the aerosol particle to an ion what instantly leads to the forming of a droplet in the cloud.

The same effect triggered by terrestrial cellphone, microwave or radar transmission would lead to a spontaneous release of free electrons by the particle, which would alter the cell potential and thus destroy or weaken the immune system of the plant.

As a secondary cause the plant might die of fungi infections covering the primary reason of its suffering.


3. Experimental proof


Germination experiments with Barium Strontium Titinate of an engineered domain added in different defined concentrations to the germination process need to be conducted to experimentally evaluate the lethal dosis of Barium Strontium Titinate for plants. I would estimate a concentration of 35 mg/kg soaked seeds as a targeted area of experimentation, adding the Barium Strontium Titinate to the water making sure it is completely absorbed by the seeds.

I would suggest to work on crop seeds like corn, soy beans and wheat, and some fast growing things like cress for quick results to be able to publish a first version.

It should be possible to purchased (Ba, Sr) TiO3 via internet, I saw some offers. If it is impossible to get hold of smaller amounts I suggest to privately contact people working in labs where this substance is used.

4.             Conclusion

Although the postulated mechanisms and their interaction is not fully researched there is enough evidence and logic in the matter to NOT use nano particles of the described quality unless the matter is fully researched and damage to plants and nature can be excluded.

Although it is tempting to control the weather to the benefits of the agriculture, although it might appear without alternative to protect our technologies during sun flares that might hit down to the equator during a possible pole shift – especially regarding the exponentially accelerating displacement of the magnetic north pole during the last five years pointing to November 2012 to March 2013 as a possible time of transit – the price might be to high and nature might simply not wake up after a winter of bringing out aerosols – being totally blinded by our attempt to protect.





Dear Sir


I kindly ask everybody who has access to lab conditions or greenhouses with controlled condition to conduct the missing experiments in chapter 4 and to report the results including pictures to:


tel. 0049 179 2661123

If I should not react on incoming results within a week this text might be used as public domain and completed with your test results naming the lethal doses of Barium Strontium Titinate together with the experimental proof. As long as e-Mail or phone contact to me is given I would like to evaluate the incoming results myself and will publish as soon as there is a visible pattern in the incoming results.


Thank you for your attention and possible contributions.




Harald Kautz-Vella

13 Responses to Norwegian study: Biological Effects Of Geoengineering Fallout On Plant Life.

  1. Maria José de Lima Neto Martins Vieira says:

    Dear Sir

    I am a pHD student and I am studying the effects of solar geoengineering on crops and agriculture in the west of Europe, in Iberian Peninsula, andI would like to have photos of the skies in the months of may and august of 2016 and 2015. It would help very much of my work right now.

    Thank you very mucho for your attention

    Best Regards

    Maria José de Lima-Neto Martins Vieira

    • Dane Wigington says:

      Hello Maria, check the attached link to access our photo gallery, FYI https://www.facebook.com/geoengineering.watch.photo.gallery/

  2. James Calfee says:

    Great report.. Also need the answer to the question.  Is this crap falling out the next day?  Are we exposed being outdoors the next day after a spraying?

  3. Laura says:

    So what can be done or used to neutralize and or stop the damage and correct the balance in water,air and soil?
    I know sunflowers can clean soil, and baking soda can nutralize harm in water- will these work? And what about the air?

  4. […] the extremely negative effects of the ongoing SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) and SRM (solar radiation management) programs. There are now no “organic” sources for food. All has been tainted with […]

  5. Addie says:

    I can’t see a place where there could be a donation given. Whoever is doing this website.. deserves to be compensated.. big time. So, where please can I send a donation?

  6. […] Posted by Bnice2me The study below was prepared by Norwegian researchers. It helps to document some of the extremely negative effects of the ongoing SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) and SRM (solar radiation management) programs. There are now no “organic” sources for food. All has been tainted with the toxic metals and chemicals being emitted by the global spray programs. Some of the toxic elements we are now forced to consume in our food have been identified, others are likely as of yet unknown. Read More […]

  7. Thank you, very interesting stuff! This study will help for people to see why plants are dying and that chemtrail spraying is just a media to directly change DNA of living planet. We must act quick.

  8. FZG says:

    One Simple Question:

    Who is the author of this “Paper”?

    The study below was prepared by Norwegian researchers.

    The PDF linked in this article above is not a study, it seems like a Paper for an alternative Truth-Congress.

  9. Otto Lund says:


    Chemtrails Trondheim Norway, late afternoon 28 September 2012 + http://www.navigate3d.no/mbbs22/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1818&start=1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers