Top Climate Researcher Urges Nuclear Power to Thwart Geoengineering

Nuclear-Explosion
Share

Geoengineering vs. nuclear power is like watching two grim reapers playing chess.

Kevin Samson
Activist Post

It is becoming increasingly difficult to write off geoengineering as conspiracy. We already have numerous White Papers from think tanks, official documents admitting to climate control plans, and many public admissions from scientists and politicians alike.

This week geoengineering has been launched further into the mainstream. First we saw Riley Duren, a Chief Systems Engineer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Labs, caution against rogue geoengineers and mad scientists using climate control as a potential weapon. Curiously this is the exact same concern that was expressed by geoengineering’s leading proponent, Harvard climate scientist, David Keith. Keith likened geoengineering to nuclear weapons … and the subsequent race to acquire that technology. These concerns are centered around structuring the proper international governance to ensure that geoengineering is carried out correctly.

Ironically enough, after the parallel drawn between the power of weather modification to the power of nuclear weapons, one of the “foremost climate researchers” is also confirming the reality of geoengineering, while reinforcing the “rogue geoengineer” meme; but he is suggesting that nuclear power is the solution to the inevitable need for geoengineering.

We are seeing an emerging spin being put to geoengineering that is preparing it for mass media rollout. This new meme is that we have a developing race among nations and individuals to solve the urgent global climate problem. In so doing, it is a de facto way for the establishment to claim victory in the debate over whether or not there is even a problem to be solved. Instead, we are directed toward the “inevitability” of a threatening climate, with an additional spin to the story that weather modification is only in its conceptual phase and no one has any idea who will be in charge of such initiatives when they are fully introduced, so we need global governance to handle these issues.

A government study recently emerged to set the tone. The report, “Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy” phrases this global race towards geoengineering as a potential “free for all.” It opens the door for a global framework to address not only the possible dangers of geoengineering itself, but also the danger of leaving the power in the hands of local governments to test and impose their own solutions. As Derrick Broze reported:

According to a recent congressional report: “The term “geoengineering” describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects. (Source)

The politicizing of the climate is an interesting one to observe, as it is instructive to see which powers are attempting to get to the forefront. We of course had Al Gore and his banking buddies’ carbon tax schemes; we have international bodies indicating that they are prepared to usurp states and nations for the greater good and global security; and as you’ll see below we also have the nuclear industry using climate change to push their own agenda.

The following excerpt from a Bulletin of Atomic Scientists press release takes the approach that geonengineering is an extreme measure, and is one that does have major consequences, but that through nuclear energy we may be able to avert the programs being discussed. The language is interesting, as it shows both that geongineering is already widely discussed among scientists (though clearly still thought of as tin-foil hat material by the corporate media), as well as an assertion that there could be “enormous unforeseen consequences” if such climate-saving measures are employed.

“I think one can argue that if we were to follow a strong nuclear energy pathway—as well as doing everything else that we can—then we can solve the climate problem without doing geoengineering.” So says Tom Wigley, one of the world’s foremost climate researchers, in the current issue of Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, published by SAGE. Refusing to take significant action on climate change now makes it more likely that geoengineering will eventually be needed to address the problem, Wigley explains in an exclusive Bulletin interview.

In the interview, Wigley, a scientist at the University of Adelaide, Australia and at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado, explains the two basic geoengineering strategies to reduce climate change: injecting aerosols such as sulfates into the stratosphere to block a portion of the sun’s radiation and thereby cool the Earth, much as volcanic emissions do; and the large-scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The aerosol-injection approach is much more likely to be pursued at current stages of technological development.

To avoid the need for geoengineering, which could have enormous unforeseen consequences, the international community should pursue increased deployment of nuclear power plants, which do not emit carbon dioxide, to address the climate crisis, Wigley says. He contends that many of his colleagues in climate science are generally supportive of nuclear engineering and less fearful of it than they are of geoengineering. But his pro-nuclear stance has already sparked a public backlash from climate scientists who oppose nuclear power, geoengineering, or both those methods of dealing with climate change.

“When I talk to people from any walk of life, I do talk about geoengineering,” Wigley says. “But I mostly push nuclear. Because I think one can argue that if we were to follow a strong nuclear energy pathway—as well as doing everything else that we can—then we can solve the climate problem without doing geoengineering.” (emphasis added)

To illustrate the intellectual conflict within such “science” the official bio of The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists spells it out quite clearly:

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists informs the public about threats to the survival and development of humanity from nuclear weapons, climate change, and emerging technologies in the life sciences. Scientists, engineers, and other experts who had created the atomic bomb as part of the Manhattan Project established the Bulletin in 1945. http://bos.sagepub.com

Yes, this eminent group was spawned from its own threat to civilization – very comforting to know where the solutions are coming from. In the wake of Fukushima and the other apparently “unforeseen consequences” of that event, and the impact of many others, geoengineering vs. nuclear power is like watching two grim reapers playing chess.

The fact that geoengineering is emerging into the open indicates that the threat level has increased. When we look at the possibilities, we must see only two: geoengineering either has been hidden for nefarious purposes, or these “experts” are completely delusional – both possibilities are grave threats to humanity.

Let’s take this new openness by the establishment as an opportunity to engage the newly aware and offer the history behind both of these “solutions” as nothing more than an ongoing potential extinction-level event. Let’s begin seeking true open-source energy solutions, as well as free up research into currently fringe ideas such as free energy and the wonders of new materials such as graphene or the Navy’s method to turn seawater into clean fuel. These solutions will go beyond the divide-and-conquer strategies of “climate science” and get to the heart of the matter: low-cost, safe, clean energy solutions that equally benefit humans, nature, and the planet.

 Geoengineering (chemtrails): for background please consider the following sources…

Sites:

Nuclear Power

There are few better sources discussing the threat of nuclear power than Dr. Richard Wilcox who resides in Tokyo and has been documenting what he sees on the ground – politically and physically – as a result of the Fukushima meltdown.  His body of work can be found at Rense.com and earlier articles are archived on his own site here.

Please feel free to add your own sources to the comment section below.

Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2014/04/top-climate-researcher-urges-nuclear.html

Related:
Weather Control by Lasers

9 Responses to Top Climate Researcher Urges Nuclear Power to Thwart Geoengineering

  1. dan says:

    hello great article and great information I’m with you 100. but on the second paragraph down you say david keith likened, where i think you meant to say david keith linked.

  2. Dale Webster says:

    All about Blocking the Sun. Taking the immune system down. Making severe storms. Making People Rich. Keeping those big bucks rolling in to Big Corporations. And it is Definately about Depoulation. A very sad situation indeed. Anyone who works in this Geo engineering field to make money have to be very unstable and have no morals. It really amazes me still that there are so few that know what is going on. More should be aware of this trajec situation. It gets me when you see one devastation after another and the people can’t figure out why. This one meterologist in Canada says he likes the storms and snow. Must be getting paid some big bucks I would say.

  3. bob wood says:

    been reading some of the shit that c walker posted and I got to say that he or she which ever fits …must be on a substance I was never able to attain…and Ive had some of best grade stuff on the planet…so damn he or she gets and a+!!

    • Constant Walker says:

      Maybe “bob wood” could chuck his own too-precious “I,” before leaping to crazy conclusions about this Old Man. If s/he has some ‘alternative’ explanation to propose, for the dire condition ALL our Condition is in here, then s/he could just go ahead and offer it. Otherwise, it might be better not to parade his/her immaturity and ignorance for all the world to see.

  4. sherry taylor says:

    wow nuclear power and geoengineering..the mind boggles.
    Leave it to David Keith to say that one..lol.
    Two grim reapers for sure.. and yes we are f..ed.
    There are a few more..in case that doesn’t do the job fast enough..baby haarps (called gwen) all over the globe zapping the atmosphere and earth. Leaking radiation from nuclear power plants(the biggest being fukushima), a cauldron of methane methane bubbling of the Russian arctic sea shelf(over 100 times worse than carbon per molecule). That’s the short list. Mind control really does deserve a top spot with the haarp item..as how else could we explain such irrationality. When My daughter was 10 she asked me “mom, do people do things that they know hurt themselves?”
    that is a question that deserves a careful answer..and all I could think of was to say calmly “yes sometimes they do”.
    I was just surprised she thought to ask that.
    Why isn’t all of humanity asking that right now and doing something about it?
    t
    Then again at 11 when I read “the dairy of Anne Frank” I wondered..”why didn’t they all just get up and walk out”.
    Good questions..well we know about the fluoride now they were doused with..and yet mysteriously it is still being “argued” even now re our drinking water.
    This isn’t a debate..just good to ask questions..like how on earth could nuclear power possibly help anything..after what we are going through with fukushima?
    If we have lost our curiosity and ability to ask questions then we truly are f…d..mind control.

  5. Joe Mama says:

    Alan, you hit the nail on the head. It’s in every country every day…that’s a huge amount of money and human resources attached to it. This is HUGE…we don’t know half the story, but we know its bad.
    Like watching 2 grim reapers playin’ chess.
    I hope we are not fucked

  6. Alan says:

    This one: “geoengineering either has been hidden for nefarious purposes,”
    Once you accept this you must seek the dark source that is spraying with thousands of aircraft daily…then take a few moments and consider how tremendous of a force can spray like that…really think about it…are you willing to go all the way or are ya’ll going to bitch about Al Gore George Bush or any of the other TV puppets or do ya got the balls to consider the real source….then maybe we have a place to start.

  7. Constant Walker says:

    Every junkie dreams feverishly of a “free” and unlimited supply of their drug-of-choice….in a de-natured form, moreover, such that the habitual ‘use’ of it is without any ‘negative’ side-effects. Those addicted to degenerate “energy” are no different….no different, either, in their congenital incapacity to recognize that it’s their addiction itself that’s killing them. The particular ‘substance’ of it, in THE END, is only incidental.

    Our tame Human Sisters and Brothers, as expressed in this article, are casting-about desperately for some imaginary “low cost, safe, clean energy solutions that equally benefit humans, nature, and the planet.” This homo domesticus-centric conceit ignores the Natural Fact that “nature” and “the planet” have no need whatsoever for any manmade “energy solutions.” It is only domesticated Humans, and their invasive, retro-viral tormenting entity ‘gods’ here, who are fatally addicted to degenerate “energy”….which is, after all, nothing but the deadly ‘fall-out’ from the industrial-strength degradation of the physical forms here that are the Natural Expression of Earth’s Natural Vitality….Her Whole Living Arrangement.

    The Planet-wasting “civilization” disease, now deep into its own terminal throes, is nothing but the ‘process’ by which these “Self”-styled ‘gods’ degrade the material manifestation of Earth’s Natural Vitality into the various sorts of degenerate “energy” upon which they subsist….and of which what’s left of their own physical form now consists. Their own insatiable appetite for “energy” required the capture and control of some Life-form here with the ability to actually ‘operate-on’ (and in) this physical realm, something they long ago lost in their own desperate drive to feed their “energy” habit. The Human component of Earth’s immune system offered just the the thing for those purposes.

    So, just like it says in “The Book,” these invasive tormenting entities used previously co-opted and corrupted Beings brought here from ‘elsewhere’ to manipulate the ancestors of the virtual subspecies homo domesticus, infecting them with the miniaturized “self”….the specific ‘mechanism’ of the syndrome’s immune-suppression regime that renders “self”-possessed Humans organically dysfunctional, and actively inimical to ‘the rest’ of Earth’s Living Arrangement. Until here we ALL are today, already well-along toward that “extinction-level event” viewed above with such obvious alarm.

    Those among our tame Sisters and Brothers who want genuinely to help address the condition their own and ALL our Condition is in, to possibly arrest the “progress” of the wasting disease somewhere short of the Planet-’death’ toward which it is otherwise dead-certainly headed much sooner than later, can do so only by first getting over the biologically paralyzing sickness that is their own too-precious usurping “self.” Only then can they re-emerge into Her Living Arrangement as Free Wild Natural Persons, and coalesce spontaneously into the Free Wild Natural Communities that are the true Organic Form of Humanity here, and within which alone resides the Organic Integrity essential to fulfillment of our Function as a component of Her immune system.

    All else, as the poet said, is mere “vanity.”

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers