Who is “Suspicious Observer”?


After watching a number of the short youtube videos put out by this person, whoever he is, I have found myself wondering what his point was exactly.

In his most recent 9 minute release, I have come away with the impression that this individual may in fact be trying to covertly sell global geoengineering.

Geoengineering Watch

I have some questions for whoever produced this most recent video.

You mention a gap between Co2 and warming, why have you not mentioned CH4? This gas is over 100 times more potent than Co2 over a ten year time horizon and is at present spewing from seeps all over the globe, literally beginning to saturate the atmosphere. The methane “time bomb” appears to be already going off in the Laptev sea, this unfolding event is a global game changer all by itself. Anthropogenic activity, especially global geoengineering for the past 60 years, have likely been a major factor in this potentially life ending methane expulsion on our planet. Suspicious Observer does not even bother to mention or consider the inarguable “cause and effect” factors in regard to human activity and the accelerating changes on our planet. Aside from all other factors, the ongoing geoengineering programs alone are virtually “terraforming” planet earth.

The image below shows the result: Massive amounts of methane venting from the seabed, penetrating the sea ice, and entering the atmosphere over the Arctic Ocean.

Methane, Faults and Sea Ice

Next question,
Suspicious observer names numerous sources in the attempt to paint the picture that the IPCC said global warming had stopped over the last 15 years. I would like to see anything stated by the IPCC that is even close to this conclusion. It is interesting that the sources “Suspicious observer” sites for this information are all either military industrial complex main players like NASA and Lockheed Martin, or main stream media power structure controlled sources like the NY times, FOX news, and National Geographic.( National Geographic also parrots the official story on 911)

The most interesting and primary message of the video in question is the point it pushes about the earth losing its “shield”. Is Suspicious Observer trying to tell us something? Is he subtly suggesting that perhaps we need a new shield? Perhaps something like the sprayed atmospheric particles offered by geoengineering?

Other factors relating to geoengineering and our totally disrupted climate that are not brought up by “Suspicious Observer”, No mention of the massive reduction of sunlight,( now some 22% or more ) due to the relentless spraying of toxic metal particulates into our skies 24/7.


No mention of the 26 or more massively powerful ionosphere heater facilities around the globe that are literally tearing the atmosphere apart. (HAARP installations)


No mention of the coutless smaller RF transmitters around the globe which also appear to be a component of the totally out of control global geoengineering juggernaut of insanity.


Not a single word about the increasingly decimated ozone layer which appears to be primarily caused by geoengineering and the ionosphere heaters. (The CFCs which were blamed for ozone destruction are mathematically little more than a “red herring” in comparison to the massive global spraying from geoengineering..)


Dying boreal forests, changed ocean currents, altered hydrological cycles around the globe, all connected to geoengineering, again, not a single word.


He finishes with, “The truth is electromagnetic solar system shift” , Thats it? Nothing else is effecting the planet?

I think it is reasonable to say that there may indeed be things happening in the cosmos, though we primarily have only gov agencies to rely on for that data. That being said, there are very obvious and undeniable cause and effect issues which “suspicious observer” does not seem to consider in any way, shape, or form. Another prime example is below.

When the jets were grounded after 911, the temps immediately shot up


Of course the main stream media calls the spray trails “contrails” and not “particulate trails” in articles like the one linked above, but what else can we expect. The bottom line is that the two days after 911 revealed the profound effect the ongoing geoengineering programs are having on the climate, and even this event is only the tip of the ice burg.
Again, not a single word about geoengineering. No consideration whatsoever of the countless anthropogenic factors that have unquestionably effected our biosphere and climate systems, only the painting of a picture that appears to be a possible attempt to covertly sell geoengineering.

Am I the only one suspicious of “suspicious observer”? It seems not as the link below shows,


And another


All is at stake in our unfolding dillema, the most powerful and corrupt people on the planet wish to divide and deceive. The fossil fuel industry and the military industrial complex would seem to have ample motive to convince populations that our problems are coming from out there somewhere and not from all the horrific activities connected to them, starting with global geoengineering.

We must all make up our own mind in the end, but I for one am convinced that there is ample reason to be suspicious of “Suspicious Observer”.


14 Responses to Who is “Suspicious Observer”?

  1. NM Remote says:

    SO is merely another Koch Brothers supported “anti-global-warming” site to convince us that it is OK to continue to use fossil fuels. There is valid information about the sun and magnetic fields – all free US Government supported data – but hyped by SO to assure us that “all is well” in the world of petro-chemical engineering.

  2. canon says:

    I am not a geoengineer but I know a little about earthquakes and methane gas. I also know that the sun is in compliance with the earth. I know when I read a fact and when I don’t and have called on this many times and been made a joke of on several sites. We work with geoengieers in the business we are in direct knowledge of what happens and the truth. These two guys you mention are patsys because of pride and lack of knowledge about what they say to the general public. There is no way to get them off chanel as they just come back like bpearthwatch under a differnt name. As long as you feed their pride with nonsense they will exist. Now it is raining astroids and rock from the sky; hasn’t that been going on for several thousand years? Thanks.

  3. Adam says:

    I have been following suspicious for quiet some time now, where I would agree that he isnt talking about all the things mentioned here by Dane, what I do see him doing is giving a non opinionated 4 min news report simply showing us the major weather events and covering other major events as they happen like earthquakes and volcanos, floods, that type of thing. He also has shared info on geoengineering, solar radiation management. and he isnt not for it. but I think what it seems like he is doing is just trying to share his perspective of whats going on, from what he looks at which is the larger scale(cosmos, the sun) I’m a big supporter of Dane and his work here, and I agree that the spraying is definitely one of the greatest problems we face. It would be impossible to talk about weather if you tried to include all the factors, so hes doing the best he can with what publicly available info. Also he is a advocate for the electric universe which i think is a very compelling possibility. Stay classsy folks

    • Hello Adam,
      In the case of SO, though he does say some things of relevance, as a whole, he blames the climate chaos on cosmic events and not the glaring and well understood geoengineering madness all around us. Disinformation is always delivered with a course of truth. Whether intentional or not, the result is the same. I believe SO is doing much more harm than good.
      Thanks you for your support, hope you continue to research and stay in the fight with us.

  4. rollsthepaul says:

    He snapped on me one day and gave me a freaked out response, full of anger. I was just trying to follow and contributed what I could but he didn’t want the interaction, so he let me have both barrels. I cross checked him with a reputable astronomer, who stated that SO was talking out of his ass. I no longer pay any attention to this egomaniac. he offers nothing of value, even though he has said “I know what I’m talking about”.

  5. art says:

    Suspicious observer is an im poster . BPearthwatch
    used to be there . I think he was kicked out . this imposter toke his place . and his cape . but Bp has his own site . and he is as hones as the come
    art from holland

  6. James says:

    Oh, I thought of the perfect person to join Max, on the desk. You will know immediately who i am thinking about, she’s a french animal activist. If she would agree, the underwriting would be underwritten. What better thing to accomplish right now, than to save not only all the animal species, but everything they are connected to. The 4-H club would be my next target, 6.5 million members. Imagine if they spoke out.

  7. James says:

    (Continued on Max)

    Two add-on points, (one is a question) what if Bliss were to broadcast his daily 5 minutes from a different location every day. HA! That would do the trick. Could be done with volunteers who chart their their daily sky, they shoot, Max broadcasts and interviews. A geo-engineeringwatch daily video feature. The second question is, what corporate sponsor alive would cover the cost. There must be one..one who could survive. It needs a producer, a director, etc.. low budget is fine, good, better..best.

  8. James says:

    When i think about it, Max Bliss is doing that more or less. I don’t know anyone else that videos so frequently. He also captures the emotional response state of mind quite well, the full range between awe and revulsion. That he’s an Englishman reporting from the South of France makes it even more interesting. I think you’re both right. There should be a news broadcast daily by ‘a voice’. I vote for Max, he has the guts, the brave heart, and the voice. He’s also a framing carpenter, which makes him on the level! :)

    Between royalty and Max, if I had a choice to sit down over coffee and discuss the environmental crisis, it would be Max.

  9. Jesse Smith says:

    His show is scripted right out of Hollywood, His father is a Big time Hollywood producer. This guy is playing us all. I quit posting his stuff after dutchsince came out with the truth about this bozo. Wake up People.

  10. David says:

    James, I agree Geoengineering needs its own 3 minutes news program on Youtube. not a lot of people know this site exists (www.geoengineeringwatch.org), those that know are spreading the word about it. But we need a bigger outlet and a 3 minute news program would be of great help and put it up on the various alternative media outlets for all to see.

    Thanks for a great article Dane.


  11. Lynette says:

    The geoengineering is the most important subject. Thanks for this site. Yes, it is the evil doers on this planet who bring misery with their lies and toxic skies and spies. :) Kind regards to you. Lynette

  12. James says:

    Good article. I’ve listened to the 3min news, and wondered about his agenda for the same reasons but I wasn’t aware of such controversy( truther shootout at the OK corral). SO’s storyline does not take into account geoengineering, that seems to be the main point. Is it deliberate misinformation? What else can one think? The sun is not suddenly killing the planet’s ecosystem. So what is? Monarch butterflies, gone.

    The storms and the weather are getting more violent by the day. We are living and breathing a new man-made atmosphere, a chemical soup of particulates. That’s what’s missing from the picture. His point of view reflects a dreamlike view, where none of this is taking place, ignoring its force and effect, just like my favourite weather lady. Therein lies the tragedy. Geoengineering needs its own 3 minute news.

Add Comment Register

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers