Top Biochemist Calls to Abolish Smart Meters, WiFi in Schools, and Baby Monitors


Our modern world is creating an electromagnetic soup filled with electrical pulses, radio frequencies, computer screens, wireless signals, as well as personal devices such as cell phones and gadgets that are emitting damaging radiation. There are many peer-reviewed scientific studies drawing conclusions that should concern us all, but particularly for young children and pregnant women. Government agencies are even doing battle amongst themselves over outdated scientific information that still impacts current regulations.

Recently, neuroscientist and professor, Olle Johansson, PhD, offered a comprehensive view of the many issues surrounding EMFs, including an industry-wide attempt by telecom to cover up the negative consequences. It is a must-see lecture that can be viewed here.

Adding further credence to the dangers of EMFs, another well-regarded scientist who has eight international awards for his work, Prof. Martin Pall, a Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, is also calling for action against common emitters of electromagnetic pollution. In the video below, you will hear how he goes so far as to say that these devices are a biohazard which need to be abolished.

As Dr. Pall mentions, there are actually 20,000 scientific papers that acknowledge the potential harm from EMFs – there should be none.

Among the well-documented effects of exposure are:

  1. Oxidative stress.
  2. Single strand breaks in cellular DNA.
  3. Double strand breaks in cellular DNA.
  4. Cancer.
  5. Male and female infertility.
  6. Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier.
  7. Loss of melatonin (which is now has been shown to lead to a reduction in bone densityEd.)…
  8. …Consequent sleep disruption.
  9. Effects on brain and heart function.
  10. Possible link between increased prevalence of EMF radiation and rise in autism.

So, as you can see, this is a full-spectrum assault on the human organism which, further, can lead to ongoing generational effects. Serious indeed.

Below is an additional presentation that Dr. Pall gave to the Portland, Oregon city council. Let’s hope they adopt a different strategy than Maine, which had broad support for new legislation until the cell phone lobby completely dominated popular opinion that led to a wireless radiation bill first being passed, then was completely reversed once the money and political influence fully appeared. That story is important to note for any activists who are raising this issue in their local communities.

Joel Moskowitz, PhD wrote in his article “Lobbying Madness: Wireless Radiation Label Bill Passes Maine Legislature Before Dying:”

On March 11, 2014, the Maine House House of Representatives passed an amended version of “The Wireless Information Act” on a vote of 83 to 56. The bill, LD 1013, requires that any manufacturer’s information relating to radio-frequency exposure must be plainly visible on the outside of the cell phone’s product packaging or the packaging must contain a label with the following warning for all cell phones sold in the state that have manufacturer’s safety warnings:

“RF EXPOSURE: To find information relating to radio-frequency exposure, refer to information supplied by the manufacturer and language directing consumers to the page or pages of the owner’s manual or other insert or location where the radio-frequency exposure guidelines or instructions or general information may be found.”

The Maine Senate agreed and voted 21-14.

No matter:

Cell phone industry lobbyists killed the bill by co-opting the Democratic House leadership to switch their votes from approval to disapproval. Several other states, including California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Pennsylvania, have tried to adopt cell phone warning label laws but have been blocked by intense lobbying by the cell phone industry. The industry does not want consumers to read the microwave radiation safety warnings that cell phone manufacturers bury in cell phone user manuals, nor does it want cell phone users to take simple precautions to reduce their risk of harm. The industry has argued before the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that consumers will panic if they are informed about the risks from exposure to cell phone radiation that have been reported in the scientific literature. (emphasis added)

You can download and read Professor Pall’s paper here:
Microwave Electromagnetic Fields Act by Activating Voltage-Gated Calcium

Source: Activist Post

16 Responses to Top Biochemist Calls to Abolish Smart Meters, WiFi in Schools, and Baby Monitors

  1. Faye Carmody says:

    Wrapping a smart meter does not prevent the other neighboring meters from "attempting" to connect with the foil covered one.  The meters transmit in a "daisy chain" fashion.  A home can also be a collector for many meters.  The information in this one meter is then transmitted to a main collector found at the top of a pole in our neighborhoods.

    Also, to show how dangerous this radiation is, a Telus worker told us about a meeting called when smart meters were first installed.  The meeting included workers from Telus, Hydro, Bell, and all other providers.  They were warned that absolutely no one was allowed near a pole "collector" unless Hydro was informed first and turned off the power to the collector.  Interesting that these collectors are found right near homes where people live!!!

  2. Lakotah says:

    I'm amazed, no, stunned, no, perplexed, yes perplexed on how many of the articles here relate to stuff I've thought about just by paying closer attention (for once) the past 5 or ten years and putting together stuff that seems to add up to be a potential hazard to humanity like how this article starts out.

    When PG&E installed their Smart Meter on our house, we then started to hear sounds like the Taos Hum. Which started up big time and previously reading about problems people are having with their health etc supposedly from the Smart Meter I had started thinking about all the the other stuff, like the stuff we can't see like AM, FM, UHF,police radios, military communications, cell phones, satellites, Ham radios, military testing, CB radios, privately held radios, airway communication, WiFi,  and the list is endless. If all these waves were visible, all we could see is grey. There would be no sky, trees, no water, no beautiful sites, nothing, nothing but grey to see. And this stuff is bombarding us 24-7 365 days a year. This can't be good for anybody including the animal kingdom and we can't forget the insects. All this just has to take a toll on the people today and now with this heavy bombardment of chemicals and the increased technology we're bound to start up with some new un-diagnosable disease. I'm might be going out on a limb here, but there's going to be a lot of real ill people walking and driving around here in the very near future. I'm no genius, but this is a no brainer.   

  3. Judy says:

    it will not be until  enough peoples, in each community band together, and demand the removal of the meters, peoples throw out the wi fi, return to land line phones, and destroy the instant always on cell phones, demand the removal of wi fi ,and radio towers, and stop nukes of all kinds….and stop weather georngineering…and poisons in our food, waters, air and lands…that humanity will survive…we got a late start!

    Just look at the above list to see how stupid we have been…now iff you want humanity to survive..stand the hell up and start a petition, go to council meetings…for any of the above…in your area! It only takes one person to start the change…be that person!  Like Dane has been…do something! Now!!

    no one is going to do this for us….how bad do you want it?

  4. Anne-Marie says:

    Aluminium foil does work, however, you need to create a chimney to allow the radiation to escape in the direction you want it to. You can’t just completely cover the meter and expect the radiation to stay put.

  5. Faye Carmody says:

    For some weird reason, foil can make the situation worse! We put it onto the neighbor’s meter and that was the result. Then we tried an aluminum mesh cage which was grounded. This helped, but did not stop the meter from transmitting through our home three times a night for over half an hour each time. Next, we found a lead tile which is now placed over the meter and we placed a huge panel covered with four layers of heavy-ply aluminum foil over our window on the side of the meter. We have the whole side of the house meshed (and grounded) and the fence is foiled with aluminum. The radiation is still getting through, but is substantially better.

  6. Irishgirl says:

    Try places like Utah they have some beautiful mountain country.I’m quite sure you can find as much acreage as you would ever want. Montana is also like Utah and Montana won’t try to force those “smart” meters on you & your family.Good Luck Faye I wish you and your family many years of good health & happiness.

  7. Faye Carmody says:

    My husband and I are extremely sensitive to electric magnetic fields. I had to leave my teaching position because I became so ill. Now, we are being forced to sell our home because all of our neighbors have the smart meter (we refused one) and the WIFI and Optic TV which are unbearable. We are trying to find an acreage to escape . . .

  8. SuperLuminal Man says:

    It’s NOT that simple; would that it WAS. —Such a tactic will not prevent your home from being irradiated with toxic microwave emissions from the damnable things

  9. John says:

    Deamon possessed human bodies.

  10. Skruffy says:

    I replied to Robert below, don’t know why my comment was placed at the top of the pile.

  11. Skruffy says:

    It would also unfortunately stop the meter from sending any signals and make it necessary for someone to come and check out what was wrong. Better to block all the sides except out to the road. Of course then you’d be frying your neighbours and they’d be frying you. Hmm

  12. Pamela says:

    People are so addicted to their electronic devices it will be difficult to convince anyone of the dangers. When people want something, they overlook all warnings–or think: it won’t happen to me.

  13. Great good work Dane. LOVE Always John.

  14. robert says:

    wouldn’t wrapping the meter with aluminum foil create a Faraday cage and block the signals ?. I would think it’s that simple.

  15. Alan says:

    Dead man walking.
    Raising awareness will not save us.
    Humans are being destroyed by some species/hybrid.
    Brzezinki-Bush-Anderson Cooper-Vanderbilt-Gates-Clintons
    Whatever the hell they are.

  16. Becky says:

    is there any escape? Maybe the tinfoil over the head wasn’t such a bad idea.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *