We scientists are the gatekeepers of the basic information that fuels decision making by nations, businesses and communities. As these public entities are more and more threatened by the advancing impacts of climate warming, from flooding, to water scarcity, to the spread of tropical diseases, our role as objective scientists has to change. We are so skilled at many, many detailed and quantitative tasks, but, as you would expect from a community of introverts, we are not great at shining that brilliant light back on ourselves.
The list of catastrophic consequences being inflicted on our planet by the ongoing global climate engineering assault is unimaginably long and growing by the day. "Solar radiation management" programs have long since been fully deployed. These completely unregulated climate engineering operations are for the specific purpose of blocking out the sun by using jet aircraft to spray highly toxic reflective heavy metals and chemicals into the atmosphere, what could go wrong? In addition to wreaking havoc with global weather patterns, destroying the ozone layer, and contaminating the entire biosphere, climate engineering atmospheric particulates are, of course, blotting out the skies and thus greatly hampering the ability of astronomers to view the cosmos. A recent article from Gizmodo points out that geoengineering "could be" a disaster for Astronomy. Though the Gizmodo article unfortunately does not admit to the ongoing climate engineering reality (and thus that climate engineering is already a disaster for astronomy), the ongoing geoengineering/weather warfare assault is rationally undeniable.
From the Gizmodo article:
Geoengineering is one of those things that sounds like maybe a good idea on paper but could also go horribly, apocalyptically wrong. But if the prospect of plunging Earth’s weather systems into chaos isn’t enough to convince scientists we need to tread very cautiously with the ultimate global warming tech-fix, perhaps this will: geoengineering could be a disaster for science.
This photo of Earth was taken from Apollo 17 in 1972. Other than the Antarctic region at the bottom of this photo, there were many open blue sky zones.
That’s according to new models by Charlie Zender, an atmospheric physicist at the University of California, Irvine who presented the provacatively-titled research poster “Death of Darkness: Artificial Sky Brightness in the Anthropocene” at the the American Geophysical Union conference this month. In a nutshell, Zender found that injecting light-scattering particles into the stratosphere—one of the most widely-discussed strategies for rapidly cooling the planet—would have the unintended side-effect of disrupting incoming light from distant stars and planets.
This NASA satellite photo of Earth was taken on July 6th, 2015. There are very few "clear" regions to be seen in this recent photo of our planet. Even the zones that appear at first glance to be cloudless, are hazy.
As you might imagine, this would be very bad news for the scientists who study said stars and planets. “If we geoengineered globally, this would affect all telescopes around the world,” Zender told Gizmodo.
SAI (stratospheric aerosol injection) has come under heavy fire for an obvious reason: conducting a worldwide experiment on our one and only shared global atmosphere is inherently dangerous.
The satellite images above are very revealing. The images corporate media weather "forecasters" show to their viewing public are heavily filtered. The "enhanced infrared" (unfiltered) image clearly shows massive geoengineering aerosol operations. The "standard infrared" (filtered) image only reveals the remaining atmospheric haze from the jet aircraft particulate dispersions.
Zender found that the night sky over urban areas would become roughly 25 percent brighter. That’s because our stratospheric shield would backscatter light from ground sources…
Earth's oceans are not spared from the ongoing global climate engineering operations. In fact, the seas are subjected to two types of highly destructive climate engineering programs, solar radiation management (SRM) and ocean fertilization.
Of course, most astronomy doesn’t take place anywhere near cities. The best observatories in the world are located on remote mountaintops, high above air pollution and far away from light pollution. Here, Zender’s models show a somewhat different, but equally bad effect: SAI would actually make the skydarker.
Massive climate engineering (SRM, SAI) aerosol dispersions are now constantly visible in unfiltered satellite images.
“Our telescopes are in positions where most of the [night] light comes from the stars,” Zender explained. “There, what the aerosols do is they backscatter light from outer space. That means you’re not getting as much starlight, and the starlight you do get is less pristine. The stars would look fuzzier.”
Though the threat posed by climate engineering/weather warfare is inconceivably greater than just the loss of clear skies for astronomers, all catastrophic aspects of the covert global climate engineering programs must be considered. We must all do our part in the battle to expose and halt the geoengineering assault, make your voice heard in the critical effort to sound the alarm.
The rapid expansion of noctilucent cloud formations and sightings is an ominous sign of our rapidly disintegrating biosphere that almost no one is heeding. "Official" sources are doing their best to pacify the populations on every front and this includes the subjects of noctilucent cloud formation, atmospheric methane accumulation, and climate engineering.
Noctilucent clouds in the skies above Antarctica are an ominous harbinger of the atmospheric damage that is occurring there.
Our miracle planet that was once so incredibly hospitable for countless life forms is now spiraling into a completely altered state of environmental and climate collapse. The vast majority of the human race (for various reasons) is unwilling or unable to show any concern for the bigger picture. Thus the unfolding fate of our species is now not only in question, but mathematically on track for certain near term total extinction if we remain on the current trajectory. Much of the populations in third world countries have their hands full simply trying to survive from day to day. Much of the populations in first world countries are completely preoccupied with their own personal pursuits of profit and pleasure. In the meantime, the military industrial complex is continuing to expand its power and its completely out of control experiments on Earth's life support systems. Global climate engineering programs are the epitome of the military industrial complex insanity and hubris. Climate engineering/weather warfare programs are wreaking havoc around the globe in countless ways. One of the most grave and immediate threats we face is mass methane release from formerly frozen methane deposits in Earth's strata. In the attempt to hide the already manifesting consequences of the methane buildup in our atmosphere, the power structure and the geoengineers have only fueled the overall fire. All available data indicates that the atmosphere is being microwaved in a desperate and unimaginably destructive attempt to mitigate the methane buildup which risks turning our once thriving planet into a lifeless rock that resembles Venus. The temperatures in the polar regions are skyrocketing as are observations of the ominous noctilucent clouds which have emerged at the earliest date on record this year. Recent releases of information to some degree attempt to attribute the noctilucent clouds to natural processes, but is this true? Mainstream sources of information only elude to the methane/noctilucent cloud connection and the threat that is looming over the biosphere.
Photo credit: Anna Anikina
Every year, for a period of between five to 10 days, the night skies over Antarctica are visited by an unusual phenomenon known as night clouds or noctilucent clouds (NLCs). Residing at an altitude between 47 to 53 miles, these electric-blue clouds are the highest in Earth's atmosphere and can only be observed well after the sun has dipped below the horizon at twilight.
Photo credit: Juhku
According to NASA, night clouds are a relatively new phenomenon, with the first observations occurring a couple years after the eruption of Krakatoa sent tons of volcanic ash high into the atmosphere. They increased again after the Tunguska meteor event over Siberia in 1908. In 2007, NASA launched the AIM satellite (Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere) to specifically study noctilucent clouds and discover the conditions that favor their formation.
"AIM and other research has shown that in order for the clouds to form, three things are needed: very cold temperatures, water vapor and meteoric dust," James Russell, an atmospheric and planetary scientist at Hampton University, said in a NASA article. "The meteoric dust provides sites that the water vapor can cling to until the cold temperatures cause water ice to form."
The Krakatoa event, says Thomas, likely "seeded" the upper atmosphere with dust, allowing noctilucent clouds to be seen over more populated areas. In its most recent observations, however, NASA is reporting that the blue cloud formations are not only starting earlier than normal, but also once again spreading beyond the polar regions. You can see a time-lapse animation capture by AIM of the clouds forming over the Antarctic in the tweet by NASA below.
Credits: NASA/HU/VT/CU-LASP/AIM/Joy Ng, producer
Researchers believe the beautiful twilight displays, observed as far south as Colorado and Utah, could be due to an increased abundance of methane in the upper atmosphere.
"When methane makes its way into the upper atmosphere, it is oxidized by a complex series of reactions to form water vapor," Russell added. "This extra water vapor is then available to grow ice crystals for NLCs."
Because methane is roughly 30 times more potent a heat-trapping greenhouse gas compared to carbon dioxide, its theorized that noctilucent clouds could potentially serve as a kind of "canary in a coal mine" on climate change. For now, however, the connection remains tenuous.
"I think the jury is still out," SpaceWeather.com's Tony Phillips told the SFGate in 2015. "But it is undeniable that increasing levels of methane favor the formation of NLCs at very high altitudes."
If the masses do not wake soon and properly prioritize their efforts and energies there will be no chance for the long term survival of our species (and perhaps even all life on Earth). Industrialized society (which includes climate engineering) has all but decimated our once thriving planet. What are each of us willing to do in order to try and salvage what is yet left of Earth's life support systems? Reaching a critical mass or awareness is the first leap forward, make your voice heard in the critical effort to sound the alarm.
As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words. The photo images shown below were captured from NASA satellite sources, they are truly alarming. These images provide shocking and undeniable proof of the ongoing global climate engineering/geoengineering/solar radiation management assault on our planet and its life support systems. Highly toxic heavy metals and chemicals (that are systematically sprayed into our atmosphere from jet aircraft as part of the geoengineering/SRM programs) are manipulated with extremely powerful radio frequency signals. These signals are transmitted from countless locations around the globe from various types of transmission platforms (ionosphere heater installations like HAARP, SBX radar, NEXRAD, etc.). The impact of the microwave transmissions on cloud formations is profound and highly visible (square cloud formations are created under some scenarios).
In the series of NASA satellite images below, many variances of radio frequency cloud impacts can be observed. The degree to which the ongoing climate engineering/climate/intervention/weather warfare is disrupting Earth's atmosphere and life support systems is already beyond catastrophic and happening all over the globe.
Click to enlarge any of the images below
Off of east coast of Australia
West coast of Africa
Off of Africa's west coast
Off of Africa's west coast
Off of Africa's west coast
South of Spain in the Alboran Sea
Off of Africa's west coast
Off of Africa's west coast
The northwest coast of Australia
Off of Africa's west coast
Off of Africa's west coast
Eastern Pacific ocean west of Baja California
The Southern Ocean near Antarctica
Hurricane suppression/manipulation is one aspect/agenda of the climate engineers. 85% of the hurricanes that impact the US originate from Africa. Low pressure systems migrate toward the west, off of Africa's coast. A great deal of climate engineering/intervention takes place in this region, thus a number of the satellite images shown in this post were captured there. In the attempt to mask the climate intervention activity, the cyclone suppression occurring off the coast of Africa is officially blamed on "dust". Of course there is no acknowledgement of the ongoing climate engineering atrocities. The quote below is an excerpt from a FOX news article.
Right now, much of the Gulf of Mexico and parts of the Caribbean have slightly warmer than normal ocean temperatures which would normally aid in tropical development. But there is so much dust and dry air in the atmosphere that storms are getting choked off before they even get started.
Though some may feel that cyclone suppression is beneficial, such interference with Earth's natural rhythms and systems has a long list of catastrophic downstream effects. Available data indicates that in other scenarios the climate engineers are actually augmenting and steering cyclones to serve their own agenda. "Hurricane Matthew" may be an example of weather warfare on an unimaginable scale. Is hurricane Matthew being heavily manipulated and steered by the climate engineers? The evidence continues to stack up. Below is a satellite photo clearly showing atmospheric "waves" surrounding hurricane Matthew. SpaceWeather.com has labeled these as "gravity waves", but is that what these visible "waves" actually are? The satellite photos already shown in this post inarguably reveal heavy atmospheric manipulation from extremely powerful radio frequency/microwave transmissions and atmospheric aerosols. These transmissions leave a signature pattern on high level cloud formations that are saturated with electrically conductive heavy metal nanoparticles which are dispersed from jet aircraft as part of the ongoing climate engineering insanity.
Does the photo above really show "gravity waves" surrounding hurricane Matthew? Or does it show the signiture pattern of extremely powerful radio frequency/microwave transmissions interacting with aircraft dispersed atmospheric aerosols? Both of these elements are a core part of climate and storm manipulation and steering. Photo: SpaceWeather.com
The global power structure long ago made the choice to subject our planet (and the entire web of life that it supports, including the human race) to an unimaginably massive and destructive climate intervention/weather warfare assault. This decision was made without the knowledge or consent of global populations. If we stand by and allow the decimation from the climate engineering insanity to continue, very soon Earth's life support systems will be beyond any recovery. This is not speculation, but a mathematical certainty. Help us with the most critical battle to expose and halt the climate intervention/weather warfare assault, all of us are needed in this fight.
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.
How expansive and blatant does the climate engineering elephant in the sky need to be before society wakes up and the climate science community shows an ounce of honesty? Unfortunately most of society no longer recognizes natural cloud cover from a sprayed toxic aerosol sky. Our atmosphere has long since been completely altered by the constant toxic jet spraying assault, rapidly accelerating impacts are now taking a catastrophic toll on the climate system and the entire web of life. Time-lapse film footage is particularly useful for clearly revealing the true extent of the atmospheric spraying, the 6 minute video below is a compelling example. We are all now living under a canopy of contamination that is decimating the biosphere and all life. Join the fight to expose and stop the climate engineering insanity, make your voice heard.
Our society is taught and conditioned to accept the dictates and opinions of the so called "experts" without questioning their conclusions. In so many circles of academia honesty and morality has long since been abandoned in exchange for a paycheck and a pension. When one branch or group of the science community completely contradicts another group from the same field of study, shouldn't that be a glaring red flag? Nowhere do we have a more egregious and criminally negligent example than with the climate science community's complete denial of the climate engineering issue and its overall effect on the planetary thermostat. While the vast majority of climatologists/scientists and governments around the globe are either "investigating" or pushing for global geoengineering/solar radiation management to be deployed for global warming "mitigation" (as if geoengineering has not been going on for over 70 years already), other camps in the science community have long since confirmed that jet traffic and "contrails" (sprayed particulate trails) are actually a major contributor to global warming. A dozen sample articles are below which confirm the overall warming effect that is caused from jet aircraft traffic and "contrails".
"ScienceShot: Jet Contrails a Big Global Warmer" (Science magazine)
"Airplane contrails and their effect on temperatures" (Christian Science Monitor)
"The Contrail Effect" (From NOVA and PBS)
"Jet Contrails Actually Do Alter The Weather" ( Discovery Magazine)
"Flying Further To Avoid Jet Contrails Might Help With Global Warming" (Popular Science)
"Airplane Contrails Boost Global Warming" (National Geographic)
But are we really witnessing "contrails" in our skies? Can "contrails" be turned on and off? No.
ALL commercial jet aircraft and ALL military tankers are fitted with "high bypass turbofan jet engines", does this type of prolusion system typically produce any "condensation" trails? No again.
The grand deception is this, all available data proves beyond reasonable doubt that the trails being used to blot out the sun and alter the weather around the globe are intentionally sprayed (and highly toxic) particulate trails that are the direct result of ongoing covert climate engineering programs. The closest the climate science community has come to telling the truth is to admit that "contrails" may be causing "accidental" geoengineering. How is it possible that we live in a "civilized world" in which such massive, obvious, and unimaginably destructive programs can be carried out in plain sight while the climate science community (and academia as whole) adamantly and criminally denies this verifiable reality? The quote below from climate scientist, Sarah Myhre, sheds some light on the mindset of many in academia (though still, of course, omits the issues of geoengineering/solar radiation management).
(Sarah Myhre is an ocean and climate scientist with expertise in the marine ecological consequences of abrupt climate warming.)
How bad is the true state of the global climate? As dire as the recent article excerpt below may seem, the unfolding reality on the ground is far worse and global climate engineering is helping to fuel the overall fire.
A so-called “Blue-Ocean Event” — a period during the melt season with less than 1 million square kilometers (a little over 386,100 square miles) of Arctic sea ice — was not expected to occur until 2070 to 2100 by most science modeling projections of the early 21st Century.
Recent polar ice observations, however, indicate extreme loss of volume. Daily sea ice loss rates since late April 2016 have averaged about 75,000 square kilometers (about 29,000 square miles) per 24 hours, resulting in continuously record low levels.
Many climate scientists now project the first “Blue-Ocean Event” within a decade or less. Some experts speculate it may even occur during the melt season of 2016.
The unfolding planetary meltdown is rapidly accelerating with Arctic ice at far beyond record low levels and a record early snow melt. The Arctic meltdown is now being described as a "train wreck" by scientists while global sea level rise continues to rapidly accelerate. All available data indicates 2016 will be yet another year of record shattering heat around the globe. We have already exceeded the point of no return in many respects and even now so many remain completely oblivious to converging catastrophes that are already taking an immense toll. The human race has decimated the planet in countless ways, global climate engineering is the epitome of that decimation. As the biosphere continues to implode, the military/industrial complex (and all those invested in it) have done exactly what they have historically done, further expand the global geoengineering assault in the desperate and unimaginably destructive attempt to hide the collapsing climate from the population for as long as possible. Military personnel are being told they are engaged in benevolent programs for the good of their nation, this could not be further from the truth. Climate engineering is ultimately about power and control at the cost of killing the planet, nothing less. The time for our military brothers and sisters to wake up to what they are being used for is long past due. They must remember the meaning of the oaths they have taken to protect the country and The US Constitution from ALL THREATS, both foreign AND DOMESTIC. The time is also long past due for the climate science community and academia to reclaim their virtue and tell the truth, the whole truth. To do otherwise is to continue in their betrayal of the human race and life on Earth. Finally, those in the media that have led the campaigns of completely criminal deception should be exposed in any and every possible public forum with their public email contacts posted for the world to see and utilize. No matter what challenges we face, if we all work together, effectively and efficiently, we can yet expose the insanity and all those who have participated in it. We may one day be able to hold Nuremberg style trials to hold accountable all those who have contributed to climate engineering crimes and the cover-up of these crimes. Though climate engineering can create short term highly toxic chemical cool-downs, these events come at the cost of a worsened overall warming. Help us in the battle to expose and halt the insanity in our skies, help us to reach the necessary critical mass of awareness, this is the only way forward in the fight. Make your voice heard while you can.
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.
Why are there so many record droughts unfolding around the world? A warmer atmosphere holds much more water vapor (7% more for every degree in centigrade of warming). The laws of physics state it MUST rain more on a rapidly warming planet. So why are record shattering droughts increasing in regions all over the globe? Because geoengineering/solar radiation management programs are completely disrupting Earth's hydrological cycle.
Geoengineered skies over Yosemite National Park, California. Photo credit: Ron Kauk
By saturating the atmosphere with particulates (aerosols) to produce the "global dimming" effect (which is the stated primary objective of the SRM climate mitigation programs), the geoengineers have totally derailed the planet's primary terrestrial life support system, rain. The climate engineers literally control the global spigot. Controlling precipitation means controlling food supplies and populations all over the world. The intentional attempt to create a "nuclear winter" is actually fueling the overall warming of the planet in addition to expanding global drought. Record droughts are decimating ecosystems and populations around the globe along with fueling water conflicts. Droughts comparable to the engineered catastrophe in California are happening in countless regions. The headlines below are all recent breaking stories, all are click to open links.
Global geoengineering is not just ecocide, not just genocide, but planetary omnicide. Geoengineering is weather warfare, nothing less. Due to the highly toxic fallout, climate engineering must also be considered biological warfare. The ongoing weather/climate manipulation is not only wreaking havoc on the planet's climate system, geoengineering is also destroying the ozone layer. Without an ozone layer, there would be no terrestrial life on Earth. Though some "official sources" claim the ozone hole is recovering, UV metering from the front lines completely disputes any such conclusion. The ozone destruction will only get worse with every day that the atmospheric spraying is allowed to continue.
The heavily damaged ozone layer is allowing dangerous UV radiation levels to reach Earth's surface.
Many in the climate science and environmental communities are justifiably criticizing the special interest groups and organizations who are aggressively denying global warming, but what about their own inexcusable criminal denial of the single largest climate disrupting factor of all, global climate engineering? How can there be any legitimate discussion of the climate without first and foremost addressing the climate engineering atrocities? There can't be. We are now in the "Anthropocene epoch". Any form of anthropogenic activity that alters the biosphere (and thus Earth's natural systems) must be considered a form of geoengineering, This being said, climate engineering and its highly toxic fall-out is the greatest and most immediate threat we face short of nuclear cataclysm. How do we stop it? Reaching a critical mass of awareness is the only way forward, all of us are needed to do our part in this most critical battle to salvage what is yet left of Earth's life support systems.
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.
A shocking percentage of academia has completely sold out to the cabal that is currently controlling the world. What is the primary objective of this core of global power? To perpetuate at any cost. The inevitable killing of the host, planet Earth, is not a consideration for them. The true consequences of climate engineering are catastrophic beyond comprehension, yet, the dangers have never been a factor for those in power. The just released science study below is a reflection of the total moral depravity that now rules and runs industrialized/militarized society. What is the primary goal of the study? To determine the best approach to gaining public acceptance of "stratospheric aerosol injection". The individuals that authored this study and their employer (the Kiel Institute For the World Economy), should both be considered accomplices to the ongoing weather warfare crimes. Some excerpts from the report follow:
This paper analyzes determinants of technology acceptance and their interdependence. It highlights the role of affect in attitude formation toward new technologies and examines how it mediates the influence of stable psychological variables on technology acceptance. Based on theory and previous empirical evidence, we develop an analytical framework of attitude formation. We test this framework using survey data on the acceptance of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI)…
Furthermore, affect is an important mediator between stable psychological variables – like trust in government, values, and attitudes – and acceptance. A person’s affective response is thus guided by her general attitudes and values.
We live in an increasingly dystopian world in which the power structure (and the legions of academicians it controls) are not only creating conditions of planetary omnicide in their quest for total control, but they are also striving to make the public at large embrace the unfolding omnicide.
Fighting climate change is one of the major global challenges of the 21st century. However, even timely and substantial cuts in greenhouse gas emissions may fail to limit global warming to 2°C above preindustrial levels (IPCC 2014). Against this background, new technologies to limit global warming, known as climate engineering or geoengineering, entered the scientific and political debate. Climate engineering technologies could be an effective way to cool atmospheric temperatures and prevent massive damages from climate change. However, many of these technologies carry substantial risks. Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), for example, could change precipitation patterns or induce abrupt temperature changes…
Public concern about climate engineering technologies is substantial (Bellamy and Hulme 2011; Borick and Rabe 2012; Macnaghten and Szerszynski 2013; Merk et al. 2015) and has been voiced in protests…
In the present study, we analyze the factors that determine the acceptability of climate engineering for the case of SAI.
(1) How do stable psychological variables – i.e., values, environmental attitudes and risk attitudes, and trust in government – influence technology acceptance? Do they enter attitude formation via cognitive or affective pathways?
The chart above (taken straight from the report) makes the objective of this study crystal clear, to frame "stratospheric aerosol injection" in a way that will most likely produce public "acceptance".
2. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
Our model builds on established theories of risk perception and attitude formation and combines them into a comprehensive framework. It accommodates the value‐belief‐norm theory (Stern 2000) and the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen 1985) in assuming that the acceptance of a technology is determined by domain‐specific beliefs…
2.1. Risk and Benefit Perception
Attitudes form in part from a weighing of risks and benefits (Ajzen 1985). Consequently, the perceptions of risks and benefits of a technology are direct antecedents of acceptance.
2.3. Trust in Government
Trust in institutions associated with the technology is a consistent predictor of technology acceptance…
2.4. Egoistic and Altruistic Values
Values are guiding principles in the life of a person (Schwartz 1992). As stable characteristics they direct attention and form beliefs and attitudes across an array of contexts (Stern, Kalof et al. 1995). For environmental behavior, egoistic and altruistic values are particularly relevant (Stern 2000). In attitude formation toward technologies with environmental consequences, these values guide a person’s focus in weighing perceived risks and benefits (De Groot and Steg 2007; De Groot and Steg 2008). People with strong egoistic values display a preference for social power, wealth, authority, and influence; they tend to mainly consider perceived risks and benefits for themselves. By contrast, people with strong altruistic values display a preference for equality, world peace, and social justice and tend to focus on perceived risks and benefits for others.
1. This causal model of trust is particularly suitable for assessments of new technologies on which people have little information but are knowledgeable of actors involved (Earle 2010). The associationist model of trust, by contrast, supposes that the acceptability of a hazard influences perceived risks and trust in authorities. The associationist model is particularly suitable if people are knowledgeable about a hazard, but not about actors involved. For example, the acceptability of a hazard may be used to assess the trustworthiness of regulatory authorities…
Heavy geoengineering aerosol spraying in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. Photo credit: Eric Jacobs
The global geoengineering assault (stratospheric aerosol injection) has been wreaking havoc on the climate system and the biosphere for decades. In spite of the total decimation being inflicted on our planet from the ongoing climate engineering programs, the players involved are too committed to their quest for total power to turn back.
Aerosol injection is yet only little known and protesting or supporting behavior has not yet evolved.
Through SRM, a portion of the sunlight is reflected before it can warm the Earth. This can be achieved by, for example, spraying sulfate particles into the atmosphere at a high altitude.
… respondents were asked about their acceptance, their risk and benefit perception as well as their affective response to aerosol injection. Finally, altruistic and egoistic values were elicited.
It changes the amount of precipitation.
It can take away people's motivation to change their lifestyle.
There is the possibility of further unknown and unforeseeable risks.
The abrupt increase of Earth's temperature in case of a sudden stop of SRM can lead to severe problems for humans and the environment.
The use of SRM could cause international conflicts.
Global warming is slowed down more quickly than by cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
Massive and irreversible changes in the climate can be stopped before too much damage is done.
It is cheaper than reducing the consumption of fossil fuels.
Even if certain countries do not want to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, it is possible to stop climate change.
The claimed "benefits" of "stratospheric aerosol injection" are a reflection of the usual military/industrial complex mentality of programmed delusion. The already proven reality is this, climate engineering is nothing short of a global cataclysm. Geoengineering programs are the greatest and most destructive assault ever launched by the human race against the life support systems of planet Earth.
3.3.3. Trust in Government
Trust in government was measured by the question `How much do you trust that the federal government will act in the interest of the environment and the society?’ We thus used a broad definition of general trust in good intentions for society and the environment. The 4‐point response scale ranged from `do not trust at all’ (1) to `trust completely’ (4).
However, the relevance of beliefs about humans’ capacity and right to rule over nature likely varies with the perceived scope of the technologies’ interference with nature.
We proposed a technology acceptance framework that captures the interplay between values, attitudes, affect, risk and benefit perception, and the acceptance of new technologies. Using data from a large survey, we successfully tested the framework analyzing the determinants of the acceptance of stratospheric aerosol injection.
Our data show evidence of both affective and cognitive pathways in attitude formation. Acceptance is directly influenced by positive and negative affect, as well as perceived risks and benefits. People are, however, more strongly guided by affect than by their perception of risks and benefits. Furthermore, affect is the most important mediator between psychological variables – such as trust, values, and attitudes – and acceptance. All variables influence acceptance partly through an altered affective evaluation. Only trust, altruism, and state of nature change the perceived effects of the technology not only via affect but also directly.
In our survey, we provided neutrally framed, unbiased information. Only few respondents had heard about aerosol injection before the survey and there has not yet been a broad public discourse about the topic.
This is the world we currently live in, one in which the vast majority are all too willing to serve the cancer that is consuming the planet so long as their service and obedience produces a paycheck and a pension. The current paradigm is already well into the process of collapsing, those that still refuse to believe reality will very soon be forced to face it. If we all work together we could yet expose climate engineering before the power structure is prepared for this to occur. If we can expose it, we can stop it. We need to reach this goal before the coming collapse materializes and we lose our ability to communicate on the current scale or perhaps the ability to communicate at all. Help us to sound the alarm, make your voice heard, time is not on our side.
The majority still subscribe to the delusion of industrialized society as a benefit to the human race, but can such a conclusion be rationally defended? Global climate modification is the pinnacle of industrialized insanity and arrogance. Even now, as life on our planet is struggling desperately to survive, the military industrial complex that rules the world is pouring Earth's dwindling finite resources into yet more destruction with geoengineering at the top of the list.
The greatest lie ever perpetrated and propagated is the lie of the "persistent condensation trail". Without knowing any of the related science facts on this issue, anyone with a sense of reason should be able to determine the fact that our skies are being sprayed. Trails that are turned on and off, grid patterns one day and nothing the next (in spite of identical atmospheric conditions). Witnessing one jet leaving a trail from horizon to horizon adjacent to another jet at a similar altitude that leaves virtually nothing. Trails of completely dissimilar compositions and colors. Plumes behind jets that do not match the alignment of the engines themselves causing some of the trails to shoot out to one side of the aircraft. There is also of course the fact that climate science circles and governments around the globe are clamoring for climate engineering to be deployed, though none in these communities of tyrants and cowards will yet admit to the truth. Our society has been well trained to accept the official narrative on countless issues which is how those in power hide their crimes in plain site. The fact that so many official explanations are completely contrary to reason and the laws of physics seems not to matter to most of the population, "ignorance is bliss" as the saying goes.
We are told by all official sources, agencies, and elected officials, that all we are seeing in our skies are "condensation trails". They say that it is perfectly normal for this "condensation" so stay in the sky for hours or days, widening and spreading until whole horizons are completely blotted out. Yes, what we see is exactly what they say they want to do with solar radiation management (SRM), but they assure us that geoengineering is not actually going on. Those that choose to believe these blatant lies simply do not yet want to wake up. Here is the fact of the matter, all commercial jet aircraft and all military tankers are fitted with a type of jet engine that is by design nearly incapable of producing any condensation trail except under the most extreme circumstances, the high bypass turbofan.
7 minute high bypass turbofan tutorial
The fight to expose and halt climate engineering is a challenge that must be won or nothing else will matter. If we just go about our lives without making this battle a top priority, we are failing in our responsibility toward our children and the greater good. Help us to sound the alarm, make your voice heard, every single day counts.
When people ask how we can prove our skies are being sprayed, tell them because we have film footage of the crime occurring. This is the bottom line and the end of any rational denial. The video below is only one of numerous many that show what is undeniably spraying from jet aircraft.
Do we know with certainty that there are spray nozzles on the jets we see dumping toxic materials into our skies? Yes, the photo below clearly shows retrofit spraying nozzles mounted on the rear of the pylon directly in line with the engine exhaust to create the appearance that the spraying is a "condensation trail".
Below is another picture which clearly shows the nozzle location on the pylon.
The next video shows what is undeniably jet aircraft spraying of our skies. The dispersion from one of the military jets in the video is clearly being turned off, and then back on again. The official government narrative is that we are only seeing "condensation trails", this is a monumental lie.
Though there are numerous video segments of both commercial and military jet aircraft spraying our skies (with footage that is undeniably aerosol spraying), the 90 second film clip below shows heavy aerosol spraying from the wing tips of a 4 engine jet carrier. This proves there are more nozzles than just those mounted directly behind the engine exhaust. There are those that claim the spraying in this video is "just a fuel dump". First, how could such a conclusion be proven? The same "official agencies" that tell us we are only seeing condensation trails in our skies are the ones telling us that the type of spraying in this video is "just a fuel dump". Second, if this video does show a fuel dump, why in the world should we feel better about that? The dumping of aerosolized jet fuel into the atmosphere is likely much more toxic than the geoengineering aerosols (in either case, we can never know exactly what is being sprayed for with any certainty). What this video proves is that the jet aircraft trails we see in our sky's are not condensation trails, they are sprayed dispersions. Those that speculate on the composition of those dispersions have absolutely no way of knowing what the actual composition is. Any insinuation that we should not be concerned about a potential massive jet fuel dump is irrational. No matter what some claim as the "official explanation" for a potentially damning film capture, we should remember the official explanation for 911 and countless other lies we are fed.
The bottom line is this, unimaginable amounts of toxic materials are being dumped into our skies every single day and all of it is raining down on us. In regard to geoengineering, the elephant in the room is becoming all but impossible to hide, awareness of the ongoing climate engineering insanity grows by the day. DW
Source: Global Skywatch
This article explains why the trails being left in the sky by large aircraft cannot possibly be condensation trails ("contrails"). Once this is understood, then we are left with the ominous question: "What do these trails consist of?"
You can see the video version of this article here.
NOTE: This article has been opposed on the internet by government-paid disinformation employees. These intentionally-deceptive disinformation programs are using fabricated science to claim that high-bypass turbofans create trails.
In one example, a false study is being used to convince the public that high-bypass turbofans create trails. This study is not only based on false science and fabricated numbers, it was published after widespread spraying began and is an obvious attempt to fool the public into accepting geoengineering: The largest crime against humanity in human history by convincing the public that jet trails are a "normal result of fuel combustion", which is simply not true as will be demonstrated below.
Those in the very highest positions who are responsible for this spraying campaign will do anything to conceal it, even going as far as rewriting jet engine training manuals and courses to teach new mechanics that these engines produce trails. There is no better way to convince the public than to have "expert mechanics" believing trails are normal and relaying this disinformation directly to the public. We see examples of this type of disinformation in the education system right now with the rewriting of the second amendment in school textbooks.
We have also received first-hand accounts of military tankers and drones painted to look like passenger jets on several occasions. This causes the public to believe that normal passenger jets are producing trails further enhancing the lie that trails are normal. Remember, a crime this enormous will be concealed by lies and coverups just as enormous.
The fact that high-bypass turbofan engines cannot produce trails is the reason life-long skywatchers and pilots have never seen trails come from these engines until widespread geoengineering began (with very few special exceptions including rare water injection engines which are outlined in the article below). This is the reason professional and recreational pilots alike have contacted me expressing their disgust at the lies being thrust on the public by our governments and educations systems.
The newest tactic to conceal spraying programs from the public is to use shorter trails and to fly at higher altitudes to make these trails harder to see.
Furthermore, school textbooks and jet mechanic training manuals have now been rewritten to include the claim that contrails are common and normal. The disinformation campaign is very thorough.
See the following links to learn how false science – called "scientism" – is being used to thrust lies and disinformation upon the public:
The Global Depopulation Agenda Excellent lecture showing the use of false science to promote a specific agenda.
Despite media failure to disclose, and “government” disinformation to the contrary, there is and has been a weather modification program in full operation for many years.
The high –thin cirrus that jets have been spreading across the sky that the public has clearly seen as long trails of jet exhaust and spray turning into clouds and haze can and is changing the weather. There are clouds now that have never existed before.
The cloud nuclei being used are composed of metallic salts in nano form, all potentially toxic to life as we know it. We have documented accumulations of aluminum, strontium, barium and many others in the soil, the rainwater, snow, and plants at levels thousands of times higher than any normal condition, and many should not be present at all.
Testimony: Allan Buckmann, US Air Force Meteorologist
Wildlife Biologist Retired, California Department Fish & Wildlife
August 07, 2014
I started seeing barium, aluminum oxide, and strontium come on the (Air Force) base.
In my background as an Industrial Hygienist and an Environmental Specialist, I conducted…sampling…and saw (contamination) limits in my community that would make your head spin. And I started to realize that those peers within my professional community that were trying to wake those of us in the military up, were right!
Sargent Kristen Edwards (Meghan), Industrial Hygienist, Environmental Specialist
High-bypass turbofan engines do not create condensation trails. The ratio of air-to-exhaust is much too high to facilitate the formation of condensation because the majority of air expelled from the back of the engine is not combusted. It is passed through the "fan" and simply blown out the back without mixing with any fuel at all.
Turbine engines are the power plant for high-bypass turbofans. Turbine engines are used in other applications besides powering jets. They are also used to power helicopters and many prop driven planes, yet we never see trails coming from these types of vehicles, and the reason is simple. Turbine engines virtually never produce condensation trails.
In the video above, notice the large ratio between the bypass fan and the "core" part of the engine.
Every Condition is Wrong for Contrail Formation
The formation of condensation trails requires vacuum (reduction in air pressure), cold temperatures, and high humidity, however, the output side of a jet engine contains mostly outside air that has been pushed through the engine by the large ducted fan (The ducted fan is the set of spinning blades that you see when you look at the front of the engine). This high-pressure at the output of the engine is contrary for the formation of condensation trails because pressurized air has the ability to hold much more water in suspension, without producing condensation.
NOTE: On very moist days, you may, on rare occasions, see a condensation "tornado" spiraling into the intake side of a high-bypass turbofan engine during high-thrust conditions. This is formed by the extreme, rapid vacuum formed on the intake of the engine. This vacuum induces condensation because air at reduced pressure cannot hold as much water. On the contrary, air on the high-pressure side of these engines cannot condense because it is not under vacuum.
High school science experiments demonstrate this with a vacuum jar. As the air is expelled, a gentle mist will form. When the valve is opened repressurizing the jar, the mist immediately disappears.
Even in this image, the ratio of air flowing through the fan vs. air flowing through the turbine is out of proportion. In reality, much more air flows through the fan than depicted here.
Only a fraction of the air that enters the engine is taken in by the turbine engine. This air is mixed with jet fuel (essentially kerosene), combusted, and then exits the engine under very high pressure and high temperature. Condensation formation requires a decrease in ambient air pressure to form, but the output of the turbine is under very high pressure which prohibits the formation of condensation trails.
Physics also tells us that, under the right conditions, condensation can form when air is cooled. Since the exhaust of the turbine engine driving the high-bypass turbofan is very hot – and remains hot for a long distance behind a jet, condensation formation is – once again – prohibited. (Hot air holds much more water without producing condensation.) Furthermore, the burning of fossil fuels produces black carbon soot, not water as claimed by some websites. You can see this black soot being expelled from the engines as you watch jets take off from an airport.
Furthermore, the ratio of air-to-fuel used in high-bypass turbofan engines is as high as possible (lots of air but relatively little fuel) so as to keep engines efficient and cost-effective, so the reduced amount of fuel in this ratio results in a lack of water in the exhaust, and this is yet another reason high-bypass jet turbofans cannot produce condensation trails.
In short, the more efficient the engine, the less fuel it uses per unit of air moved, and this renders high-bypass turbofans virtually incapable of producing condensation trails, unless they use water injection, which is extremely rare today (see section below).
Simply said, every condition necessary for contrail formation is absent in a high-bypass turbofan engine.
If you go to an airport and watch jets take off, you will see that they emit a faint trail of black carbon soot, which is typical of burnt jet fuel (kerosene), but you will not see water vapor.
If there was any chance that high-bypass turbo fans would create enormous plumes of water vapor, it would occur in high-humidity conditions during high thrust. High thrust only occurs during takeoff and the highest humidity occurs at ground level as the air at higher altitudes has very low humidity levels. We don't see these enormous plumes of white water vapor during takeoff because these engines simply do not produce them.
The average adiabatic lapse rate (the rate of decrease in temperature with altitude) is about 3 Fahrenheit per 1,000 ft. Since the average temperature on the ground is 59 F (15 C), you can calculate that at 30,000 ft, the average temperature is: 59 – (3 x 30) = -31 F (-35 C). This cold, dry air provides inadequate conditions for condensation trail formation.
Real Condensation Trails
Real condensation trails form, not behind commonly-used engines, but behind high-vacuum areas of wings. This occurs when a jet is pitching up or when the jet is using heavy flaps. Both of these conditions greatly increase the vacuum (lift) produced by the wing and therefore increase the probability of contrail formation.
Contrails will normally appear on the outside edge of the wing or just outside the flaps when in a heavy-flap condition. Both of these conditions require high relative humidity.
Contrails can also appear above the top surface of a wing while a jet is pitching up (such as just before touchdown) because of the high-vacuum created while changing pitch.
Most of the wing-contrails explained above dissipate as soon as the vacuum zone ends. This explains why contrails typically last only 5 or 10 feet behind a wing (less than a second). As the vacuum zone ends, the air very rapidly reabsorbs the water vapor causing the contrail to disappear, except under the most humid conditions when the ambient air is unable to reabsorb the water.
Jet Turbines (Turbojets)
In contrast to typical turbofans, turbojets work differently. Instead simply pushing the majority of the air out the back using a large fan, all (or most in the case of low-bypass turbojets) of the air taken in by the engine is forced through the combustion section of the engine. This difference in design has a few important implications.
First, these engines are less efficient at lower speeds (below ~mach 2), but they produce thrust of much higher-velocity. This is why they are used on jet fighters and other high-speed combat aircraft. They are not used on large military aircraft or commercial aircraft.
Second, these engines have more water in their exhaust and therefore have the potential to produce short, non-persistent condensation trails when all of the required conditions are just right. These conditions are rare and so contrail formation is rare, but it can occur. Remember, turbojet engines are only used on jet fighters, not large military aircraft and not commercial aircraft.
Contrail Suppression Patents
The rare-but-possible contrail-forming potential of turbojet engines used on fighter aircraft caused the development of contrail suppression technology. This technology reduces the contrail-forming potential of these engines so these jets cannot be easily spotted while flying over enemy territory.
Government-funded disinformation contractors often cite these patents as evidence that high-bypass turbofans create contrails, but this is a blatant misapplication of the patents. The patents apply only to turbojets or low-bypass turbojets used on fighter aircraft, not high-bypass turbofans used on commercial aircraft and large military aircraft.
They Are Not Contrails
Turbojets and low-bypass turbofans – the only engines capable of producing rare condensation trails – are not used on commercial jets today. Nor are they used on large military jets. Instead, virtually all commercial and large military jets today use the much-more-efficient high-bypass turbofans.
Since we know that high-bypass turbofans are virtually incapable of producing condensation trails, then the trails we see coming from these countless jets today cannot be contrails. Instead, a mountain of evidence now indicates that these trails are deliberate particulate aerosols. You can easily identify high-bypass turbofans by their large diameter, and this engine type is clearly visible on all "chemtrail" jets we see emitting trails today.
Rare Water Injection Engines
At the end of this article is an excerpt from a data sheet published from the European Aviation Safety Agency showing certain older Spey turbofans (series 500) that use water injection for improved thrust performance.
The use of water injection in aircraft engines is rare, but it was also used in a few WW II aircraft, which explains the few "contrail" pictures floating around from that era.
The Rolls Royce Spey 512 is used to power the BAC One-Eleven. This aging commercial aircraft is in very limited use today. There are about 50 still in service, and most are outside the U.S.
If you see a short, non-persistent trail being emitted from a commercial jet, there is a small chance that it's an old Spey Series 500 turbofan. If you see a short, non-persistent trail being emitted from any large jet, it's a new non-persistent chemtrail. Keep in mind that a slowly-increasing number of chemtrail jets have been painted to look like commercial jets. We have already seen this deceptive tactic being used with military drones.
For the past few years, many have witnessed the overnight change in the trail emitted from these countless jets from long, persistent trails to short, non-persistent trails. On the same day, many/most of the jets began flying higher, and this change was obviously done to make the spraying less noticeable to the public, and this was an important tactic they used to counter the fact that awareness of this massive toxic aerosol-spraying campaign is growing rapidly in dozens of countries around the world.
Don't be fooled. Long or short, if you see a trail coming out of a jet, with very few exceptions, it's an intentional, toxic chemical aerosol.
Dispelling the Disinformation
The United States government is currently spending hundreds of millions of dollars to spread disinformation to confuse the public on a variety of subjects. The most pervasive subject of disinformation today is about geoengineering/chemtrails. Below, we will expose the false claims that they make.
Claim #1: Newer more modern jets are flying higher in the atmosphere enabling them to generate enormous plumes of condensation.
Fact: The vast majority of witnessed trail formation has been witnessed by low-flying jets rendering this claim irrelevant.
Fact: The altitude in which aircraft fly has remained unchanged for over 30 years. This widely-known fact renders this claim irrelevant. The favored altitude for commercial air traffic ranges between 25K to 35K feet, well within the Earth's Troposphere.
The vast majority of early trails (between 1995 and 2005) were witnessed at altitudes so low, the public was easily able to identify the jet type and count the engines.
Between 2005 and 2010, numerous skywatchers witnessed sudden changes. First, they witnessed a majority of the jets changing from low altitudes to high altitudes. Second, they witnessed a majority of the jets changing their trail size from long-persistent trails to short, non-persistent trails. Both of these changes typically took place on the same day in any given location.
It appears that this change was designed to make the trails appear less ominous to the public.
It's important to note that even after this change, some jets still produce persistent trails several days per month, and this is likely necessary to avoid public scrutiny that would occur if all trails suddenly vanished.
Claim #2: Newer jet engines burn fuel more completely turning more of the fuel to water.
Fact: Modern high-bypass turbofans – which are used on virtually all large commercial and military aircraft – burn much less fuel per unit of ejected air; often 25% less fuel. Therefore, they produce much less water vapor than older engines.
You will never witness a high-bypass turbofan ejecting water at an airport. You will only witness a faint, block soot that is the result of burnt jet fuel (kerosene). During take off, these engines produce the maximum amount of water vapor as compared to any other stage of flight because this is the time that the fuel-to-velocity ratio is the highest.
In other words, if an engine was to produce visible water vapor, it would be most likely witnessed during takeoff. However, these engines are incapable of producing vapor trails even during their most inefficient operating condition: Takeoff.
Claim #3: The sudden appearance of trails in the past 10 years is caused by an increase in air traffic.
Fact: Air traffic increases less than 1% per year. This amounts to a total increase of about 9% in the past 10 years.
What we have seen in the skies has been a dramatic – often sudden – increase in the total number of jets with virtually all of these new jets emitting trails while existing commercial jets did not. Furthermore, all of these new jets were unmarked, non-commercial jets flying at very low altitudes. In the past few years, we have witnessed these unmarked jets suddenly flying at higher altitudes and emitting short, non-persistent trails after emitting long trails for years. Probably an attempt to make the trails less noticeable to the public.
Chemical particulate spraying was used in Vietnam and is believed to have been used in early testing in the United States in the 1980s. During this time, there were extremely few visible trails in the sky, and since high-bypass turbofans are virtually incapable of producing trails, these early trails were likely early geoengineering tests. Developing a program of this size would require many years of testing and development and there is much documentation that this testing has been conducted on the public for decades.
It's worth mentioning that a few water-injection Spey turbofans are still in service, so it's likely that a few people witnessed them in the 80's and beyond. Today, about 50 BAC One-Eleven's are in service. This aircraft is one of the few that use water injection, but most of these aircraft are not within the U.S.
Claim #4: The government worked on developing contrail-suppression technology because of the trails produced by commercial jets.
Fact: The patents showing contrail-suppression technology were developed for low-bypass turbofans and turbojets, neither of which are used on commercial or large military aircraft. This technology was designed to suppress contrail formation on the types of engines – low-bypass turbofan and turbojets – used specifically on military jet fighters to make them harder to see over enemy territory.
Government disinformation contractors use these patents to convince the public that the large jets we see in the sky are producing contrails, but all large military and commercial jets use very efficient high-bypass turbofans which are virtually incapable of producing condensation trails. Even the fleet of aging Boeing 707s produced from the 50s to the 70s which originally used low-bypass turbofans have now been retrofitted with highly-efficient high-bypass turbofans to dramatically cut operating costs.
Claim #5: The photos floating around on the internet showing contrails from military jets in the 50's proves that jet engines produce contrails.
Fact: The handful of photos from the 50s showing military jets and prop planes used water injection or internal combustion piston engines or turbojets, not high-bypass turbofans. High-bypass turbofans – the type of engines that are on the jets producing the massive plumes today – are virtually incapable of generating condensation trails.
Claim #6: High levels of aluminum in rainwater is normal.
Fact: There are a few atmospheric studies that show unusually high levels of aluminum in rainwater. These studies are often presented by disinformation contractors as "evidence", however these studies are in the vast minority and they are conducted near the ocean, downwind of industry, or other contaminating factors.
There are countless studies and water monitoring programs that show historically that aluminum should not occur in rainwater, but studies selected by disinformation contractors are carefully selected to convince the public that contaminated rain water is "normal".
Claim #7: Condensation from burnt kerosene freezes and produces ice trails at high altitudes.
Fact: The vast majority of trails witnessed are at lower or medium altitudes making this claim irrelevant.
Fact: At high altitudes, the air is colder and thinner rendering it less capable of holding moisture. This dry air further incapacitates high-bypass turbofans from producing contrails. Remember that most of the air coming out of a high-bypass turbofan is simply pushed through the big round duct by a fan blade (called "the fan") and does not get combusted at all.
The United States government is currently spending hundreds of millions of dollars annually to confuse the public on various issues such as geoengineering/chemtrails. They are even teaching school children that contrails are harmless water vapor.
This level of disinformation is unprecedented because a harmful, dangerous, and illegal program of this is also unprecedented.
When those committing these epic crimes against humanity are caught, they will be prosecuted and executed, so they will spare no expense to convince the public that the sudden appearance of sky-covering plumes is "normal".
It's vital that everyone explores this issue while keeping in mind that disinformation is being produced in the form of books, videos, Facebook accounts, blogs, photos, and that some of this disinformation is even aimed at "changing history" by convincing the public that contrails have always been around.
You will be seeing more plumes appearing in old remastered movies and commercials. You will be seeing plumes appearing in books that have been artificially aged to look like they're from decades ago. You will be seeing medical studies made to look decades old and injected into journals and magazines that are archived online.
This type of propaganda is not unique to our time. All of these methods have been used before, but with today's technology, the ability to deceive is incomprehensible because the ability to produce and distribute well-coordinated propaganda is surprisingly easy.
We all know that helicopters don't produce condensation trails, yet most helicopters use turboshaft engines which work on the same principle as high-bypass turbofans. Turboshaft engines also use the same jet fuel. Despite these profound similarities, we don't see plumes of condensation emitted by helicopters.
Many jet enthusiasts agree that the sound of a jet engine starting is the "coolest" sound in aviation. In the video below, notice how the sound of a turboshaft engine starting is identical to the sound of a high-bypass turbofan starting.
More Information About Chemtrail Disinformation
How Persistent Aerosol Plumes are Being Changed to Short Non-Persistent Plumes To Fool the Public
High-Bypass Turbofan Engines: All Exhaust Diffuses at Low Humidity: Contrails Not Possible
Simple science dictates that diffusion prohibits the formation of condensation in low humidity conditions, such as those at flight altitudes. Furthermore, High-bypass turbofans emit carbon soot (burnt kerosene), not water vapor, and this occurs in the core of the output air-stream only. For more information about this, see this video.
Source: Global Skywatch
The era of stratospheric geoengineering: Chemtrails, greenhouse-grown organic food, and the future of planet earth
With all the information coming out in recent years about geoengineering, or chemtrails, we must begin to ask ourselves certain questions about the impacts on our health, our food, and our planet. There are obvious human-health-related and planetary-ecosystem-related implications to being “crop-dusted” with heavy metals and chemicals daily. Let’s also ask ourselves an imperative question here: When we buy “organic” food, are we really buying what we think we’re buying (i.e. pure, nutrient dense food)?
Debating a "doubleteam" of disinformation trolls on a major national radio station can make for some interesting conversation. After standing ground with solid data against the ideologue "head in the sand" disinfo host on an earlier show, he invited me back for another session. The second show was to be with his hand picked "expert" who teamed up with the host in an effort to discredit and marginalize the geoengineering reality. The two of them did their best to "debunk" hard geoengineering data, I will leave it up to the listener to decide the outcome of this "debate". Though the interview was scheduled for a full hour, it seemed the disinformation "tag team" decided to throw in the towel when they apparently felt they were losing ground. The host even cuts off one of his own listeners who calls in at the end of the debate to agree with the facts I had presented. It is my hope that this debate might be of assistance to activists that inevitably find themselves in such exchanges.
Vast Swaths Of America Now See Little Or No Sunlight;
Massive Areas Under Continuous Chemical Assault
Between the years of 2000 and 2003 I was employed by a private government contractor called Brookhaven National Laboratories in Upton, New York. While there I learned of a Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider or RHIC buried in the Earth, forming a one-mile-in-diameter circular ring containing collision detection points. At these collision detection points sampling of positively and negatively charged ions is performed every quarter of a mile. During the time I worked at BNL as a Unix systems administrator my job was to work on one of the collision detection points referred to as “Aerosol.”
Friday, January 24, 2014
Before It’s News
What many human rights defenders call a chemtrail environmental and humanitarian crisis has spurred their planning a massive global protest on Jan. 25 to raise awareness and ultimately halt the covert carpet-bombing of the planet.
Chemtrail International Day of Protest in 2013 brought people onto street
I follow the “weather patterns” and study what they are doing before they get to you as they move east from the west coast. The Coachella Valley and Palm Springs airport is a large Geoengineering base, I know this for a fact. They built a new control tower with Obama stimulus money and moved in all new control tower people a few months ago.
These three videos show examples of the peculiar webs that are being seen falling from the sky after heavy spraying.
Over the last month we’ve seen amazing sunsets and sunrises all over the world, but especially in the US. Here in Oregon, we’ve had ‘popsicle’ orange sunsets that are spectacular. But the beauty underlies what I believe is something terrifying. The addition of new substances, more drastic chemicals, to the chem spray mixes.
Something is far beyond contaminated and glow-fishy about the Fukushima meltdown. For two years it has been discussed and swarming with expertise, but with no limiting or actual efforts to stop the radiological contaminants from being released into the Pacific and all other connected oceans, the largest food and oxygen sources on the planet. Yet, surfers are surfing, swimmers are swimming, children are playing on beaches, and restaurants all over the earth are eating Pacific fish and also contaminated Atlantic fish according to multiple reports.
A news report from Fox31 reveals to the masses that chemtrails may be a reality, leaving it up to the viewer to decide.
Since at least the 1990′s, chemical weapons have been used in a spray form against the American people from the air, on a more or less continuous basis. The attacks continue today. The planes are not the air force of some other country or terrorist organization.
Soon I will be turning 60, and I cannot help but recall my mother’s words when she told me she felt as if she had outlived her understanding of how the world worked. She was in her eighties when she explained this sadness, and I felt this must surely be a common feeling in eldership, and I felt deeply sorry for her. Little did I know that I would feel much the same at sixty.