Geoengineered Snow Storms Wreaking Havoc around the Globe

aerial-spraying
Share

Can Snow Storms Really Be Engineered? There is a mountain of data including already conducted experiments, satellite imagery, lab tests of snow, observations on the ground, and multiple existing patents,  all of which point solidly to the conclusion that snow storms are being engineered with well established weather modification processes.  Two known patents for the process of “artificial ice nucliation for weather modification” are posted at the bottom of this article. The Chinese government has openly admitted they are creating ”artificial snow storms” but later backtracked after causing a billion dollars of damage to Beijing. If the Chinese government can routinely create snow storms out of what should have been a rain event, how much more advanced must our government be at this same process? When monitoring radar images of rain during a storm, it is now common to see the rain “flash out” to snow for no appearant reason. No mountains, no colliding air mass, nothing. The “meteorologists” at the Rothschild’s/ military industrial complex owned Weather Channel call this “turning over to snow”. Why would rain just “turn over” to snow for no reason? Engineered Ice Nucleation Cools Air Masse Many of the snow events occurring around the US, even at this time of year, are amazingly still occurring at above freezing temperatures. Some are at temperatures of 10 degrees or more above freezing. How is this possible? Have the laws of physics changed? It is done with various processes of chemical ice nucleation. This is the same as the first aid chemical ice pack. Mix the chemicals and you have ice. Whatever the existing temperatures of a storm and the surrounding air mass at the time the artificial nucleation is commenced, temperatures are lowered significantly further by the nucleation process. If the nucleation process is started at far above freezing temperatures, then the temps can fall to near freezing or below as the process continues. If the region where an “ice nucleated” event is being carried out is already well below freezing, the temperatures will fall to still lower temperatures. If the chemical nucleation process is inflicted aggressively enough, in already cold regions, temperatures can be driven to deadly levels well below zero. Northern Europe is currently in the grip of what appears to be just such a geoengineered event. Why Would They Do This? First, because they can. Why would the global power elite detonate over 1800 nuclear bombs? Because there is no one to stop these experiments. Because there is no regulation whatsoever of the ongoing global geoengineering programs though many “outlines” for such governance exist as if these programs are not yet a reality. There are likely other straight forward reasons. 60 years of global climate experimentation have done horrific damage to the global climate system. The planet is warming, it would appear in large part due to the damage done by the ongoing geoengineering programs. Massive ozone holes and methane releases are occurring. Now it appears that those at the helm of the global spraying programs are trying to “cover up” the damage that has been done from the spraying by spraying yet more, and probably with an ever growing list of toxic elements. Isn’t this the true definition of insanity? Doing the same thing on an ever bigger scale and expecting a different result? Though all available data makes clear that stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) can and does cool large regions temporarily, it comes at the cost of a worsened overall warming to the planet.  NASA’s own data confirms this. What Are The Consequences? The problems that arise when ice nucleation is imposed on the atmosphere are many. Some consequences we can not yet know for sure, but what we do know is bad enough. First, the entire  hydrological cycle is disrupted, and in general, greatly reduced This means less precipitation in any form, rain or snow.(Less precipitation is the general rule but when heavy rain systems are nucleated, significant “heavy wet snow” can still occur) Though the Weather Channel is doing their absolute best to ra ra all the snow falling in various locations, the fact is there is a “snow drought” in the US. Yes it’s falling, but there is not that much and it’s generally not that cold considering the time of year. The ice nucleated snow storms create the illusion of a normal winter when in fact all available statistics paint a very different picture. As we get through “winter” and closer to spring, ice nucleated events will become much more obvious. “Above freezing” snow events will become more and more common. Still, it is important to remember that geoengineered snow storms can also be carried out under extreme cold scenarios. Whatever the initial air mass temperatures, the chemical nucleation mix appears to lower the surrounding temperatures much further. Snow from artificial ice nucleation at higher temperatures is almost always “heavy wet snow”. This is a newly introduced term pushed by the Weather Channel and other main stream media sources. The snow that does fall is toxic. There are numerous lab tests to confirm that the same highly toxic heavy metals named as primary elements in geoengineering patents are being found in this “artificially nucleated” snow. This poisons the air, soils and waters. The effects on the Northern boreal forests are already horrific. Trees are dying in mass and soil PH values are changing radically. The artificially nucleated snow can be incredibly dense and heavy, often causing major damage to trees and structures.Wind patterns and ocean currents are also being negatively effected by the ongoing spraying and manipulation of natural wind currents. (The HAARP ionosphere heater installations around the globe also appear to be routinely manipulating the jet stream)  This in turn is releasing methane hydrate deposits which threatens all life on earth. (search “geoengineering/methane release”) Photosynthesis is also being radically reduced. Extremely expansive “geoengineered” cloud cover results from the particulate dispersement. This type of cloud cover is often in the form of a largely featureless overcast sky. What Is Such An Event Like First Hand On 12/21/12 this author had to suffer through yet another ice nucleated snow storm in the woods of Northern California. In the days leading up to the storm, it was comical if not completely tragic watching the local TV “weathermen” trying to explain just how it was going to snow so much when only days earlier Redding California was almost 75 degrees. They tried to explain how the 30 to 40 mile an hour winds from the storm would mysteriously die down only over the upper Sacramento Valley and that’s when the snow would fall, even with temperatures in the upper 30s to low 40s. 4-(diminished wind is also a known consequence of atmospheric aerosol saturation/geoengineering spraying. ) As is now the rule, the approaching storm brought skies full of jet dispersed geoengineering trails which covered the entire horizon in short order. A sickly colored light penetrated this toxic canopy from the early morning hours of 12/20. Natural clouds eventually drifted into view under the man made over story but they did not have the usual majestic appearance as they were “melted” into engineered clouds above. The leading edge of almost all storms are sprayed heavily. This is the “AR” of the storm. The “atmospheric river” and is a stated area of preferred spraying by the geoengineers themselves. The usual effect of this is a day or so delay of the storm and this case was no different. On 12/20 the local weathermen did there best to explain why the storm did not come in the day before as originally predicted. It “slowed down” they said. As the evening of 12/20 progressed, the 500 ft snow level that was predicted  for that afternoon did not happen. It seemed in this case the temps were so warm that the big chemical “cool down” took more effort, more spraying. It seemed the geoengineers might not pull it off as by 11 pm it was still raining at the 2000+ foot level on the mountain top where I and my family live. It was still well above freezing. Waking up at 5 am, I could already see broken trees from the massively heavy concrete snow that had apparently started some hours earlier in the night though the temperatures were still slightly above freezing. I quickly bundled up and went outside to beat the “snow” off the drooping lims of countless trees. This is easier said than done in the case of such “heavy wet snow”. It sticks like glue to everything it hits as it is in the process of melting even as it is still falling. It is not like the snow of my youth, fluffy powdery snow which easily came off the trees. There was, as predicted, no more wind. In the silence of the woods, jet after jet could be heard flying slow and low above the clouds. The snow kept falling. Into the night of 12/21, though soaked to the bone from the soggy snow, I kept up my attempt to save the trees on our mountain. As the night went on, a sound that is very painful to me could be heard in increasing frequency on distant ridges and in deep canyons, somewhere in the darkness, the sound of trees crackling and snapping, being crushed under the weight of the “heavy wet snow”. These are native trees. Trees that have adapted to the historical conditions in this region. I have been through snow events here that dropped twice the depth of snow with no damage, but this snow is different. Even the Canyon Live Oak, the strongest oak in the region, buckles under the weight and adhesion of this snow. It does not sluff off the trees but only sticks and builds. Later in the night, the frequency of collapsing trees somewhere in the distant dark was almost overwhelming. The only other sound that broke the silence constantly was the continual parade of jets overhead in the clouds, so close and low during the storm. By morning, half of the 20 inch depth of cement snow had already melted. The temperatures were still in the upper 30s and the snow had stopped. Countless broken and uprooted trees lay on the forest floor. Why? For the moment, there are virtually no jets to be heard. None. Soon enough, they will no doubt return. What Can We Do We are in a fight for life, literally. Our climate system and atmosphere are being ripped apart. Every breath we take is tainted with the toxic metals and chemicals they are spraying. Every bite of food we eat, the same. There is no “organic” anything at this point as researchers from Europe and other parts of the planet  have recently shown. These toxic elements and other influences are being taken into all that lives. Educate yourself on this most dire issue. Arm your self with essential tools for educating others. It is far more productive to hand someone some credible information they can review at their leisure than to corner them with a rant that only puts up their defenses. Examples of information flyers can be found at  “geoengineeringwatch.org/ads”. An extremely important tool to use with a flyer is a copy of Michael Murphy’s new documentary, “Why In The World Are They Spraying” which can be found at “whyintheworldarethespraying.com”. Once you own a copy, you can duplicate all you want at a very small cost. Stand up, make your voice heard by sharing credible data with all you know. It’s now or never. Dane Wigington geoengineeringwatch.org   http://www.ptodirect.com/Results/Patents?query=PN/3613992 http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/artificial-snow-creation-method.pdf http://www.news.com.au/technology/chinese-scientists-create-second-artificial-snowstorm-in-beijing/story-e6frfro0-1225796559341 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art24/ http://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=122657 http://news.stanford.edu/pr/2007/pr-slowwind-012407.html http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/htm/tests.html

33 Responses to Geoengineered Snow Storms Wreaking Havoc around the Globe

  1. Ellin Callvis says:

    We had this “chemtrail snow” here today!! – April 30th 2013 – in BC, Western Canada – it was 9oC this afternoon [48oF], and not a drop of rain, just this very light, very weird snow. The sun was shining off and on during the snowfall. The “snow” melted as it hit the ground.

    I know snow, and this was unusual stuff. I have seen it snow on sunny, mild, days, but there should have been some rain before or after.

    PS – ooops – so, There ARE comments – excuse my email to the boss. Sorry, newbie error.

  2. [...] Channel theater is getting ever more ridiculous.  The latest in a in a string of completely geoengineered snow events, “winter storm Saturn”, is as of this moment falling apart. The “meteorologists” are [...]

  3. [...] Channel theater is getting ever more ridiculous.  The latest in a in a string of completely geoengineered snow events, “winter storm Saturn”, is as of this moment falling apart. The [...]

  4. [...] can and does create large scale cooling events by blotting out the sun on an immense scale and with artificial ice nucleation of clouds and storms, but it comes at the cost of a much worsened warming overall. In addition to [...]

  5. [...] und führt bereits zu umfangreicher Abkühlung durch das massive Verschleiern der Sonne und die künstliche Kondensationskernbildung in Wolken und Stürmen, geht jedoch zu Kosten einer folgenden, insgesamt viel schädlicheren [...]

  6. [...] can and does create large-scale cooling events by blotting out the sun on an immense scale and with artificial ice nucleation of clouds and storms, but it comes at the cost of a much worsened warming overall. In addition to [...]

  7. [...] can and does create large scale cooling events by blotting out the sun on an immense scale and with artificial ice nucleation of clouds and storms, but it comes at the cost of a much worsened warming overall. In addition to [...]

  8. [...] um zu versuchen, die Temperaturen abzukühlen, desto weniger wird es regnen. Hinzufügen “künstlicher Eisnukleation” (auch Bakterien) zum  Spray-Mix lässt den Regen  noch sparsamer werden. “Künstliche [...]

  9. [...] um zu versuchen, die Temperaturen abzukühlen, desto weniger wird es regnen. Hinzufügen “künstlicher Eisnukleation” (auch Bakterien) zum  Spray-Mix lässt den Regen  noch sparsamer werden. “Künstliche [...]

  10. [...] um zu versuchen, die Temperaturen abzukühlen, desto weniger wird es regnen. Hinzufügen “künstlicher Eisnukleation” (auch Bakterien) zum  Spray-Mix lässt den Regen  noch sparsamer werden. “Künstliche [...]

  11. [...] um zu versuchen, die Temperaturen abzukühlen, desto weniger wird es regnen. Hinzufügen “künstlicher Eisnukleation” (auch Bakterien) zum  Spray-Mix lässt den Regen  noch sparsamer werden. “Künstliche [...]

  12. [...] reduces rainfall”, there are simply too many studies on this to link only one.) Add “artificial ice nucleation” to the spray mix and the precipitation appears to go down still further. “Artificial ice [...]

  13. [...] reduces rainfall” , there are simply too many studies on this to link only one.) Add “artificial ice nucleation” to the spray mix and the precipitation appears to go down still further. “Artificial ice [...]

  14. [...] reduces rainfall” , there are simply too many studies on this to link only one.) Add “artificial ice nucleation” to the spray mix and the precipitation appears to go down still further. “Artificial ice [...]

  15. [...] Artificially nucleated storms appear to be carried out under a myriad of conditions. In many cases, storms that should have yielded only rain, can be artificially nucleated to “change over” to snow. The term “change over” has recently been coined by The Weather Channel and other corporate/military/industrial complex weather agencies. A geoengineered snow event is generally called “heavy wet snow” (another recent term). This “snow” can begin to fall at temperatures far above freezing, though the ongoing chemical process eventually cools the surrounding air mass. The resulting “snow” and “ice” can sometimes remain a surprisingly long time in spite of warmer temperatures, a result of artificial chemical nucleation. This aspect of weather modification is covered in the following article, “Geoengineered Snow Storms Wreaking Havoc Around the Globe” [...]

  16. [...] Artificially nucleated storms appear to be carried out under a myriad of conditions. In many cases, storms that should have yielded only rain, can be artificially nucleated to “change over” to snow. The term “change over” has recently been coined by The Weather Channel and other corporate/military/industrial complex weather agencies. A geoengineered snow event is generally called “heavy wet snow” (another recent term). This “snow” can begin to fall at temperatures far above freezing though the ongoing chemical process eventually cools the surrounding air mass. The resulting “snow” and “ice” can sometimes remain a surprisingly long time in spite of warmer temperatures, a result of artificial chemical nucleation. This aspect of weather modification is covered in the following article, “Geoengineered Snow Storms Wreaking Havoc Around the Globe” [...]

  17. [...] to Lake Shasta as “wildlife preserve.” Dane also maintains GeoEngineeringWatch where this article first appeared. Print / ShareMoreLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]

  18. Michael Watt says:

    One of the things that I am confused about is all this evil doing by messing with our planets systems is that they are going to be hit by all this too, unless they had a whole new planet they could go to once they’ve finally killed this one, but that’s unlikely.

    • Anonymous says:

      As Dane said in the above article,

      Why Would They Do This?
      “First, because they can. Why would the global power elite detonate over 1800 nuclear bombs? Because there is no one to stop these experiments”

      If you watch these scientists discuss this subject, they seem to be a bit detached from reality. Just watch the What and Why videos.

      I am a victim of the above ground tests in the fifties, and now it appears I am also being used as subject for their studies on the health effects of this experimentation. I am not very happy about that.

      I lost my thyroid before I was 21 from the nukes. Openheimer died of cancer and so did most of my family. My parents’ generation failed to try to stop or even question the dangers of the nuke tests.

      Do we really want to repeat their mistake of not questioning how our children are being affected?

      What about all the other wonderful creatures who have just as much a right to live out their lives on their planet without going extinct prematurely.

      The trees are dying…that is a fact. What about our pets?

      Do you want to have your pets health compromised because it may be profitable for a few.

      I was concerned about overpopulation a long time ago but this is not right. I would gladly give my life it would help, but not like this.

      They won’t even answer us when we ask what they are doing.

      It may be hard to grasp if you don’t see it for yourself. But understand me when I say I know they are doing these things and have been for a while.

      I don’t really want to think about this but I have to because it is too important.

      I asked the same question that you are asking. All I can figure is they know something they aren’t telling us, or they are being very careless with our children’s future and the life on our planet.

      And as Dane has commented, they may have made a mistake. It wouldn’t be the first, would it?

      Power freaks do stupid things and make mistakes frequently.

    • admin says:

      Thank you so much for sharing your experience, Anonymous. Hopefully it will encourage people to take action.

  19. [...] Posted by Bnice2me Can Snow Storms Really Be Engineered? There is a mountain of data including already conducted experiments, satellite imagery, lab tests of snow, observations on the ground, and multiple existing patents,  all of which point solidly to the conclusion that snow storms are being engineered with well established weather modification processes. Read More [...]

  20. [...] Dane Wigington’s background is in renewable energy, being formerly employed with Bechtel Power Corp. His personal off-grid residence was featured as the cover article on the world’s largest renewable energy magazine. Dane is also a land investor and preservationist, having set aside almost 2000 acres of key habitat area adjacent to Lake Shasta as “wildlife preserve.” Dane also maintains GeoEngineeringWatch where this article first appeared [...]

  21. Steve Funk says:

    Are you testing this snow? What specific substances would you test for?

  22. [...] Geoengineered Snow Storms Wreaking Havoc around the Globe – by Dane Wigington, GeoEngineeringWatch.org Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was written by Bruce, posted on December 24, 2012 at 11:27 am, filed under Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « Quiklinx for the week of 12/17 (see Quicklinx Page above for previous) [...]

  23. Vinbeazel says:

    My friend Green Earl lives in Redding. Yu are probly aware that FRACKing has the same bad actors as those who spray overhead and is more stealth in the damage it causes 2 all water sources. It only takes a handful of gullible farmers-ranchers 2 allow the KorpRATS 2 gain access 2 an entire mountain range.

  24. Karen Foote says:

    Hi,

    My family and I want to thank you for all the effort and time spent gathering this info for us to have at easy access.

    It can be very frustrating trying to find reliable and clear thinking commentary and evidence that you and others have so generously provided for us.

    We have purchased Michael Murphy’s videos and want to thank all involved, they are excellent. We are making copies and trying to spread the info. This is so important it overshadows all the chatter and disinformation out there.

    We live in the mountains west of you Dane, and have observed the sames changes exactly as you have. We can definately back up what you are saying. We have seen these things with our own eyes and were asking the same questions. What and Why?

    We are now having repeated heavy wet snows that are breaking our precious trees and when I try to knock it off like I always did before it is sticky, not like I remember as a kid. We have had lots of damage to our forest without it even being that much of a big storm.

    I have lived in the mountains of N Cal for a long time and know these changes are getting more extreme the more they keep spraying. I don’t think it is really helping the enviroment but it is obvious it is hurting it.

    I have been a lover of nature most of my 60 years on this precious and beautiful planet of ours. It is painful to watch these changes.

    It is so obvious to some of us it is hard to understand why others can’t see what is happening. Sometimes you can feel angry and alone but knowing you guys are out there really helps.

    Our best to you and yours.

    Many thanks to you, Micheal and all the others involved. We appreciate.

    Love Skull’s video too!

    Peace

  25. [...] Geoengineering Watch – by Dane Wigington [...]

  26. [...] Dane Wigington’s Latest Article: Can Snow Storms Really Be Engineered? [...]

  27. Sandra Panek says:

    apparently the two links you published “geoengineeringwatch.org/ads and “whyintheworldarethespraying.com” have been taken down so now we cannot read up on this. Did the government take it down?

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers