Hot Or Cold? Unravelling The Confusion

Share
Divided houses don’t stand for long and those in power know it all too well. The video below is a very light, humorous, but accurately assembled presentation on realities that are very spun by the media and thus very misunderstood by the public. In the words of Mark Twain “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble, it’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so”. For those in the anti-climate engineering community, we must be sure our conclusions are grounded in rock solid facts and not in preconceptions and ideology. We cannot ask or expect others to reexamine their reality on issues like climate engineering, if we ourselves don’t constantly examine our own conclusions on the true state of the climate and how it relates to the geoengineering programs. Though the 6 minute video below does not address the ongoing climate engineering and its horrific effects, the information it does present is on target in regard to the current state of the climate system. Understanding the data on this issue is imperative to gaining credibility and traction in the fight against climate engineering.

 

One Response to Hot Or Cold? Unravelling The Confusion

  1. Dylan Jones says:

    If Arctic temperatures have increased by 1.5°C, a rate greater than at the equator and at the South pole, then it is difficult to assign this uneven shift to the role of Carbon dioxide induced warming alone.
    This is because Carbon dioxide, although emitted predominantly in the Northern Hemisphere (about 50 ° N), is a gas and thus MIXES EVENLY in the atmosphere throughout all the latitudes.

    This can be seen in this video showing surface measurements of Co2 varying over different latitudes from 1979 to 2006.

    http://youtu.be/k7jvP7BqVi4

    Now if Co2 was well mixed in the atmosphere we should have seen a similar increase in the Antarctic.
    We have not. Antarctic temperature has increased by 0.35 °C. If anything this is less than the increase in the tropic region.

    It should be clear by now that the primary candidate responsible for the UNEVEN distribution of global temperature increase is cloud cover. And the candidate responsible for the uneven distribution of cloud cover is Geoengineering.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers