Graphene Rain, Scientist Sounds Alarm

Share

Dane Wigington
GeoengineeringWatch.org

Graphene rain, are climate engineering operations the source? What aren't we being told? A highly credentialed scientist provides extensive analysis, this is a must watch report.

All are needed in the critical battle to wake populations to what is coming, we must make every day count. Share credible data from a credible source, make your voice heard.
DW

Must view, THE DIMMING, our most comprehensive climate engineering documentary:​

For Geoengineering Watch awareness materials shown below, click the image to order.

      GW flyer packet 300   GeoengineeringWatch.org booklets, DVD

Follow us:

        

9 Responses to Graphene Rain, Scientist Sounds Alarm

  1. John. says:

    maybe this is why we start coughing every evening after sunset and wake up with nasty taste and very hard to swallow until it gets washed down with water. This Am I had a sore throat, thought I was coming down with something again but it went away later on during the day after sunup.

  2. Larry deMarco says:

    Thanks Dane for this update and for keeping your word to never give up your efforts to expose goeengineering which is probably the best kept and most devastating secret of all time.

  3. V. Susan Ferguson says:

    These are excerpts from a paper written in 2016. Notice the authors are Chinese? —S

    Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms

        •    Lingling Ou,
        •    Bin Song,
        •    Huimin Liang,
        •    Jia Liu,
        •    Xiaoli Feng,
        •    Bin Deng,
        •    Ting Sun &
        •    Longquan Shao
    Particle and Fibre Toxicology volume 13, Article number: 57 (2016)

    Abstract
    Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are widely used in many fields, especially in biomedical applications. Currently, many studies have investigated the biocompatibility and toxicity of GFNs in vivo and in intro. Generally, GFNs may exert different degrees of toxicity in animals or cell models by following with different administration routes and penetrating through physiological barriers, subsequently being distributed in tissues or located in cells, eventually being excreted out of the bodies.

    Toxicity of GFNs (in vivo and in vitro)
    GFNs penetrate through the physiological barriers or cellular structures by different exposure ways or administration routes and entry the body or cells, eventually resulting in toxicity in vivo and in vitro. The varying administration routes and entry paths, different tissue distribution and excretion, even the various cell uptake patterns and locations, may determine the degree of the toxicity of GFNs. So to make them clear may be helpful to better understand the laws of the occurrence and development of GFNs toxicity.

    Administration route
    The common administration routes in animal models include airway exposure (intranasal insufflation, intratracheal instillation, and inhalation), oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection. The major exposure route for GFNs in the working environment is airway exposure, thus inhalation and intratracheal instillation are used mostly in mice to simulate human exposure to GFNs. Though the inhalation method provides the most realistic simulation to real life exposure, instillation is more effective and time-saving method, and GFNs was found that causing longer inflammation period using instillation (intratracheal instillation, intrapleural installation and pharyngeal aspiration) than inhalation.

    GFNs entry paths

    GFNs reach various locations through blood circulation or biological barriers after entering the body, which results in varying degrees of retention in different organs.

    Due to their nanosize, GFNs can reach deeper organs by passing through the normal physiological barriers, such as the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier and blood-placental barrier.

    Blood-air barrier
    The lungs are a potential entrance for graphene nanoparticles into the human body through airway.

    The inhaled GO nanosheets can destroy the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of pulmonary surfactant (PS) film, which is the first line of host defense, and emerge their potential toxicity [54]. The agglomerated or dispersed particles deposit on the inner alveolar surface within the alveoli and then be engulfed by alveolar macrophages (AMs) [55].

    Clearance in the lungs is facilitated by the mucociliary escalator, AMs, or epithelial layer [56–58]. However, some small, inhaled nanoparticles infiltrate the intact lung epithelial barrier and can then transiently enter the alveolar epithelium or the interstitium. Intratracheally instilled graphene can redistribute to the liver and spleen by passing through the air-blood barrier. The study of blood-air barrier may draw an intensive attention, since the researchers and workers occupational exposure of GFNs usually through inhalation.

    Blood-brain barrier
    The intricate arrangement of the blood-brain barrier, consisting of numbers of membrane receptors and highly selective carriers, only exerts subtle influence on blood circulation and the brain microenvironment compared to the peripheral vascular endothelium.

    The research on the mechanism of blood-brain barrier had made some progress involved in diseases and nanotoxicity. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) revealed that rGO, with an average diameter of 342 ± 23.5 nm, permeated through the paracellular pathway into the inter-endothelial cleft in a time-dependent manner by decreasing the blood-brain barrier paracellular tightness [63].

    In addition, graphene quantum dots (GQDs), with a small size of less than 100 nm, can cross through the blood-brain barrier.

    Distribution and excretion of GFNs in tissue
    The absorption, distribution, and excretion of graphene nanoparticles may be affected by various factors including the administration routes, physicochemical properties, particle agglomeration and surface coating of GFNs.
    The different administration routes influence the distribution of GFNs, for example, intratracheally instilled FLG passing through the air-blood barrier mainly accumulated and was retained in the lungs, with 47 % remaining after 4 weeks. Intravenously administered GO entered the body through blood circulation and was highly retained in the lung, liver, spleen and bone marrow, and inflammatory cell infiltration, granuloma formation and pulmonary edema were observed in the lungs of mice after intravenous injection of 10 mg kg/body weight GO. Similarly, high accumulation of PEGylated GO derivatives was observed in the reticuloendothelial (RES) system including liver and spleen after intraperitoneal injection. In contrast, GO-PEG and FLG did not show detectable gastrointestinal tract absorption or tissue uptake via oral administration.

    https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

    • Earth Angel says:

      The sadists are still at it. I thought the need to torture and kill innocent animals in the name of science had been outgrown by these sick bas*a#&s in the medical community. Aren't they supposed to be doing GOOD for human beings and the rest of the planet? WTF has happened here? Our answer: STOP the printing of money out of thin air which allows financial grants enabling this insanity to continue. THAT's how we STOP THIS. ASAP!

    • beatriz says:

      thanks very much Susan for the very informative paper. don't these doctors realize the horror of it all and what they are inflicting to humans, animals and all life, disrupting the divine design?

       

      infinite thanks Dane for all your work, courage and dedication!

  4. jac says:

    Thank you for posting Dane- if we could only reach critical mass.

     

  5. Earth Angel says:

    It's a no brainer- Even a 5 year old could figure out that graphene/ graphene oxides are substances that should NEVER be introduced into ANY living organism at all- EVER. Complete insanity that this is being done, let alone with science communities condoning it. Truly, for the most part, we have met the enemy and he is us. Poisoning ourselves and every other natural life form on a planet which sustains us ALL. How can we survive on a planet run by evil psychopaths with legions of complacent morons doing their bidding? It is the allowance of fiat money printing and the current international criminal banking system that has enabled it all to happen. This MUST END immediately. Jesus threw the money-changers out of the temple for a very good reason- and this is it. Without the ability to print endless money and funnel it where they will this would not be happening. It is  up to ALL OF  US to STOP IT NOW- in every way we can. Just do it. We are not helpless and these evil psychopaths are not gods.

  6. V. Susan Ferguson says:

    Thank you, Dane.

    No where to hide…

    Bless you for your unending courage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *