Is it Legal For The Government to Conduct Aerial Spraying Operations Without the Informed Consent of the Public?


Is your informed consent required for the government to engage in the aerial spraying of chemicals into the air that you breathe? The answer would seem to be "no".  Public Law 105-85 is online, and available for public viewing.   In this document we read:

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)— (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

This seems to say that they must acquire your consent.  …Or does it?…  Please read on to section (b)…

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes: (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical,therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity. (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents. (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control. (c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject. (d) PRIOR NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30- day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees….

So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans. Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a). In Other Words: The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire. The Following Should Also Be Noted The term "biological agent" as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:

Quote: (e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing—     (1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;     (2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or      (3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

In Other Words: The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term "deleterious alteration of the environment" brings chemtrails to mind. Informed Consent Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without "informed consent", as stated in section (c), which reads:

(c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified "in advance" if this "testing" is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all. Why not? Because you've already been "informed in advance" and you've already given your "consent". Because this "law" is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been "informed". Because you have not contested it (that's what the courts are for), you have provided your "consent". This law is part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it's called "acquiescence". Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement. Acquiesce: "submit or comply silently or without protest" So, when this law was published, you were "informed". Because you have not challenged it in court, you have "consented". By your own inaction, you have said, "Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I have no problem with it." Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of "remedy" and "recourse", it is legally binding. Judges like to say: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse". They say this because you are expected to know all of the "law" because it is publicly available for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible). So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only "seems" to. Section (c)'s only purpose for being included in this law is deception, nothing more. Deception Section (c) of this "law" is very deceptive because most people don't understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this "testing" will never happen to them unless they are informed about it. The powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue unhindered. The final result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your permission. When you consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of people are running your country, or the world for that matter.

This Public Law in The US Code: Title 50, 1520a

8 Responses to Is it Legal For The Government to Conduct Aerial Spraying Operations Without the Informed Consent of the Public?

  1. Lisa Ferguson says:

    Thank you for all you do. 💜💜💜

  2. Frank J. Verderber says:

    I have known about the aerial spraying for some time but just recently placed more interest in it.  On 10/28/2017, at about 1:30 pm I noted the clouds quill patched by aerial spraying when I saw three large jets flying at the same altitude [~ 35,000'], separated by about a quarter mile horizontally and staggered ~ some two miles apart – traveling in a somewhat N-S direction – leaving a chemical trail behind them. By 4:30 pm the whole sky over a half of western Massachusetts was blanketed with a white mist with cumulous clouds underneath. I have researched a series of Chemicals that would be excellent CO2 absorbers – based upon known use in scrubbers.  They are high molecular weight amines.  I need to evaluate other functions beyond toxicity, such as physical and optical properties.  My educated guess is that the USAF is helping NASA do research in environmental studies of the Infrared reflectance and CO2, HS, SO4, etc., absorption effects of thin vapors that have capture capability as gettering agents. If effective, the use of sprays will be several fold: reduction in gasses that create acidic environment and capture infrared radiation within chemical bonds; reflect or absorb UV and black-body radiation; and lastly, deter satellite analysis of sensitive gov't installations and logistical movements. 

    In the end, this form of sequester will only aggravate normal radial cooling and wind formations and probably induce toxic effects – fist on birds, then mice, and finally on humanity. 

    And in what form will the precipitates fall as.  Will they give us the same problems as PCB's.  The amines were chosen for the same reason that PCB's were made – Chemical Stability – so stable they may be excessively hard to clean up! 

    It is interesting to note that the UN, while complaining about the USA's backtracking on the Kyoto treaty, made mention recently that USA has the best atmosphere of any other industrialized nation!  The world is being let by blind guides, who while professing to be wise demonstrate they are fools. 

    F. Verderber BSGS/ASCT

    Russell, Ma      


  3. jess french says:

    F**K YOU UOU F**KING LIARS. If you want to fly over my house you need to formally submitted in writing in a request to fly over my respect of domicile my airspace is my air space just like you guys claim nobody can enter the space at airports airspace above my home is my own personal property and safety net so if I catch you m************ flying over my neighborhood and spraying all that b******* you will be getting papers from my lawyer I hate the courts yeah you bastards need to be dealt with

    • Eileen Martinez Carey says:

      As a Daughter of a Nuclear Vetern that was LITTLE FORCED to be in 6 nuclear bomb test starting with Bikini Island..i have an embossed GOVERNMENTS STAMP of the u.s navy that calls my, Beloved Father a "Human Guinea Pig" ..He served in active duty in the Navy for 25 YEARS &,ANOTHER 30 YEARS as a Cryptoggraper working in "top secret communications " for the u.s army..He fought the God dam ghoul government that serves the perverted elite cabal ghouls for over 30 years for full disability because of His skin cancer YET they only gave Him 75%  & that was just 6 years ago before He passed away from God dam Bone cancer…ALL GOVERNMENTS that serve the elite cabal ghouls perverts ARE JUST AS RATCHET & nasty MURDERING blood lust monsters that want to destroy ALL Life as We know it because they KNOW WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF NATURAL RESOURCES  & are population is NOT SUSTAINABLE at this rate…We must LEARN,HOW TO PROTECT OURSELVES as THEY KNOW the "ANTIDOTES " so We too know….

  4. To all who come to this page, please refer to Dane's excellent article from October, 2015.

    Massive US Senate Document On National And Global Weather Modification | Geoengineering Watch

  5. frances says:

    Since the 1% run this country anyway, the laws are made to protect them, not us. Unfortunately, being rich does not mean intelligence. The rich stupids will drag us down with them. What good is gold and paper money that is just numbers in an account anyway? There really is NO money when you think about it. Only people who can do things will have value, and most of that will be agricultural capability. Feed us only GMO crops? All five of them?

  6. Norma says:

    There is another GM experiment with BUGS called Killer Wasps. This is happening in Brazil by 3 Brazilians and they don’t disclose where the funding is coming from. Here is the link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *