ABC Completely Omits Climate Engineering Facts
When I agreed to do an interview about geoengineering with ABC weatherman Chris Edwards (former military meteorologist), I was fully expecting a disinformation “hit piece”. My decision to press on with the interview was because I felt that such obvious spin and coverup would clearly expose the agenda of ABC and Mr. Edwards to quell ever increasing public awareness of global climate engineering. (geoengineering)
Was there a complete lack of journalistic integrity in the interview linked below? I will leave that up to the reader to decide.
(Should you choose to question Mr. Edwards about his “journalism” after reviewing this article, he can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org .)
Actual interview aired by ABC:
Below is the audio for the full interview, almost all of which was edited out.
Unfortunately there was a problem with the video portion taping, but the audio is complete.
So what did ABC and Chris Edwards actually use as “proof” that climate engineering (geoengineering) is not occurring?
- One “expert” is questioned about what is in “jet engine exhaust”, (what does that have to do with sprayed payload disbursements associated with geoengineering/climate engineering programs?)
- Next, Mr. Edwards cites himself as a source of fact to prove geoengineering/climate engineering is not occurring.
- Edwards then goes on to cite a hand picked pentagon pal to “prove” his case.
- Finally, the single water test, which according to Edwards, proves there is no spraying going on over our heads. (Are we to have any faith at all in such a test conducted by those with an obvious agenda to omit any and all facts relating to the geoengineering issue like those listed below? Are we to ignore countless other tests from around the globe because of one test that Edwards did?)
What did ABC meteorologist Chris Edwards omit from his report?
- Background of interviewee, research experience of interviewee, website on the subject at hand which is administered by interviewee. (I was introduced as a “solar power user”? Isn’t that every living thing on the planet?)
- Virtually no mention of the terms “geoengineering”, “climate engineering”, “SRM” (solar radiation management), “SAG” (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering). All these terms and definitions were passed on to Mr. Edwards, why did he fail to mention any of these terms even once? Because to do so might lead some to Google the terms and thus find out there is solid science to back up this discussion, not “questionable science that grows like a cancer on the internet” as Edwards states in his so called “report”.
What else did ABC and Chris Edwards fail to investigate or even mention from the data supplied to them? (facts mentioned in interview which were deleted from aired report, facts on web site given to Edwards, video documentary links passed on to Edwards, etc)
- Video of KC 10 tanker spraying at altitude. (Though a few seconds of this vid was shown on air, the most damning parts were omitted)
- Lab tests of precipitation/snow
- NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) admits atmospheric particulates have more than doubled in the last decade, these particulates are offsetting global warming, and they just don’t know where all the particulates are coming from!
- Global Dimming due to atmospheric particulates. ( This is the primary goal of geoengineering programs like SRM and SAG) also This
- “Arctic Methane Emergency Group” calls for immediate geoengineering due to unfolding climate catastrophe.
- Massive northern hemisphere ozone depletion which available science indicates is directly connected to geoengineering
I could go on, and on, and on. Obviously we can not expect ABC and Chris Edwards to address all the facts, but to totally omit virtually all relevant facts, like those listed above? Even total omission of every single scientifically recognized term for the climate engineering programs being conducted in our skies? Is this total omission of facts an accident?
Global geoengineering programs appear to be ripping the natural climate system apart. The “weather” is already incredibly chaotic, this will likely increase rapidly as the “climate forcing” programs continue to be ramped up, blue skies are now rare.
We can expect more and more efforts from main stream media to cover up the ever more visible geoengineering programs and their effects. It is up to each and every one of us to get informed, arm ourselves with credible data, and help with the challenge of shining the light on global geoengineering. We must also help with the effort to expose those that are doing their best to hide the ongoing catastrophic geoengineering programs.
Again, if you wish to express your concerns to ABC meteorologist Chris Edwards, please do so. Taking the time to let people like Mr, Edwards know that you are not OK with their total omission of facts is important to the cause of exposing the horrific crime of global geoengineering. ( email@example.com )
If you take the time to view the recent ABC “Report” on “chemtrails” (ABC made it a point never to mention the terms “geoengineering” and “climate engineering”) you will see that Professor Joyce Penner is asked to answer a particular question about “jet exhaust” (not the subject at hand) The way in which she answered this question leads one to believe she knows nothing about “geoengineering’ or “climate engineering”.
ABC article link with original interview
The link below is only one of many and ongoing lectures done by Professor Joyce Penner on the subject of “GEOENGINEERING”
ABC’s goal in the “report” they did was clearly to hide the truth, not to tell it.
Does the Mainstream Media have a track record of telling us the truth?
By Michael Snyder, on January 6th, 2012
Most Americans believe the lie that the mainstream media is “fair and balanced” and is looking out for the interests of average Americans. Well, that simply is not true. Those in the mainstream media serve those that are providing them with paychecks. The reality is that just 6 gigantic corporations collectively own most of the major mainstream media outlets in this country. Reporters are simply not going to be allowed to report stories that are severely damaging to those corporations or to the owners of those corporations. In addition, reporters are simply not going to be allowed to report stories that are severely damaging to those that spend millions of dollars on advertising (such as pharmaceutical companies) on those mainstream media outlets. At this point, our “news” is absolutely packed with propaganda. Way too often, things are not what they seem to be on television. The mainstream media lies, lies and then lies some more. They give us the version of “reality” that their owners want us to have.
The following are 23 things that are not what they seem to be on television….
The Lie: Mitt Romney won Iowa.
So how many other “vote discrepancies” were there in Iowa? Was this just a “coincidence” or did someone do this on purpose?
The Lie: SOPA is all about cracking down on international sellers of counterfeit goods.
The Truth: SOPA is all about censoring the Internet and cracking down on websites that the federal government does not like.
The Lie: The U.S. unemployment rate is now at 8.5% and will continue to fall as the U.S. economy recovers.
The Truth: If the number of Americans considered to be “looking for work” was the same today as it was back in 2007, the “official” unemployment rate put out by the U.S. government would about 11 percent, and the U.S. middle class continues to be systematically destroyed right in front of our eyes.
The Lie: The debt crisis in Europe has been stabilized and the euro is going to be just fine.
The Lie: The U.S. stock market is in great shape and is poised to soar to new heights in 2012.
The Truth: Investors are pulling money out of stocks at an alarming rate. In fact, as CNBC recently noted, investors have pulled more money out of mutual funds than they have put into mutual funds for 9 weeks in a row. A lot of people out there expect that something really bad is going to happen very soon….
The Lie: There are no plans to replace the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency.
The Lie: Federal employees are not overpaid.
The Truth: The federal government is advertising for an “invitations coordinator” that will make between $53,500 and $102,900 per year.
The Lie: The old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs are bad for the environment and it is a good thing that the federal government is requiring that they be phased out.
The Truth: The new CFL light bulbs are filled with mercury, they are an environmental nightmare and they are incredibly toxic and dangerous if they are broken.
The Lie: The number of earthquakes is not increasing.
The Lie: The nuclear crisis at Fukushima is under control and things are getting back to normal.
The Truth: Large areas around Fukushima will be uninhabitable for the indefinite future. Back in April, I published an article entitled “Much Of Northern Japan Uninhabitable Due To Nuclear Radiation?“ At the time, almost everyone in the mainstream media was insisting that Fukushima was nothing like Chernobyl and that those that lived near Fukushima would be able to return to their homes fairly soon.
Well, it turns out that those of us that feared the worst were right after all. Just consider the following quote from the New York Times….
The Lie: Fluoride is good for our teeth and we should put huge amounts of it into our drinking water.
The Truth: Fluoride is a very toxic sedative and can be very harmful to the teeth. Incredibly, even the federal government is finally admitting that high levels of fluoride in our drinking water can be harmful. In fact, the feds have reduced the “recommended amount” of fluoride in our drinking water for the first time in 50 years.
We probably won’t see them ban fluoride any time soon, but for them to even acknowledge a problem with fluoride is a major step. In a recent article on CNN, it was reported that the federal government is now saying that high levels of fluoride in the water have now officially been linked with fluorosis….
The Lie: Using cell phones is perfectly safe and they do not cause cancer.
The Truth: Using cell phones can definitely increase your risk for cancer. Some very startling scientific studies have come out recently that are hard to ignore.
The following is an excerpt from a recent CNN article about one of these studies….
The Lie: The federal government works very hard to keep dangerous prescription drugs from ever entering the marketplace.
The Truth: America’s addiction to prescription drugs is getting a lot of people put into the ground. Adverse reactions to prescription drugs kill a huge number of Americans every year. A recent Vanity Fair article entitled “Deadly Medicine” began with the following statement….
The Lie: Members of Congress work really hard to fix the problems that this country is facing.
The Truth: Members of Congress work an average of about two and a half days per week.
The Lie: The United States has the best health care system in the world.
The Truth: The United States spends far more on health care than anyone else in the world, but we rank 50th in life expectancy, 47 countries have a lower infant mortality rate than we do and the federal government is chasing millions of good doctors out of the medical profession.
The Lie: The U.S. education system is producing a huge crop of really sharp students who are prepared to be the leaders of tomorrow.
The Truth: The U.S. education system is a complete and total joke. It is producing millions of students that are not prepared to face the real world at all. The following is a short excerpt from a recent article by Mac Slavo that many of you will find illuminating….more…