web analytics

Geoengineering

Blaming Nature And Co2 For Engineered Drought

One drop on wheat corn and dry land
Share

Mainstream media and the climate science community are blaming all of the rapidly increasing climate catastrophes around the globe on nature and Co2 with never so much as a single word mentioned about the climate engineering herd of elephants in the room. We live in truly astounding times, willful blindness and total denial of blatant obvious realities are the norm, not the exception. Those who  pretend not to see the obvious realities are considered "normal", those who dare to tell the truth are considered to be fringe and out of balance. The unprecedented drought in California can conclusively be linked to the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare being waged against the golden state. Saturating the atmosphere with particles creates too many condensation nuclei, this scatters and disperses moisture which reduces precipitation overall. Satellite images prove beyond any doubt that such atmospheric spraying is occurring constantly upstream from California in the storm track. Media and the climate science community is completely denying and ignoring this fact, this denial should be considered criminal by a population that is literally under assault. The constant spraying is also contaminating virtually every breath we take and the affects are cumulative. The article below correctly states the incredibly dire scenario now faced by Californians, the state is turning into a dust bowl. Again, what the article does not mention is the primary causal factor in this drought catastrophe, climate engineering.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

HAARP, A Weapon Of Mass Destruction

Haarp2
Share

HAARP is the acronym many people recognize, it is an "ionosphere heater" facility in Alaska. Mainstream media and the military industrial complex tried to convince the public that HAARP was going to be completely dismantled by the summer of 2014, but did this happen? No, and now it seems HAARP has been funded through 2015, the lies never end when the government is involved. What many people don't know is that the Alaskan HAARP facility is only one of many major ground based ionosphere heaters around the world. This global network of incredibly powerful ionosphere heaters is wreaking havoc on the climate system and the biosphere as a whole. The more educated activists are in regard to what the ionosphere heaters are and what these installations  can do, the more effective they will be in the battle to raise awareness on the critical climate engineering issue. The summary explanation of HAARP below is an important read.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Hazy Shade of Chemtrails

hazy-shade-of-chemtrails
Share

Manmade Weather from Blue to Haze

Screen Shot 2015-03-02 at 5.05.00 PM
Share

Thanks to Chantal Dupuis for her contributions to the fight against climate engineering with the attached video and the letter below addressed to officials.


 


Source: Cybel Production

Premier of Ontario, Service Ontario The Honorable Kathleen O. Wynne
Minister of Transportation, The Honorable Steven Del Duca  
Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, The Honorable Glen Murray 

  

 

SUBJECT: Exoneration from the Drive Clean Program's obligations for reasons of Conscience 

Dear Ministers, 

I am writing to you jointly because you represent all of the accountable bodies for the Drive Clean program: Service Ontario, the ministry of Transportation and the ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. This letter is to signify my refusal to comply with the Drive Clean program in order to obtain a legal registration for my personal use vehicles, the mandatory  Safety Standards Certificate shall be enough. Many reasons led to this decision. 
  

The Drive Clean program requires that an emission test be performed on my car for pollution reduction goals by the government of Ontario. At first it sounds laudable but in reality, it no longer has a significant effect according to an Auditor General's report written back in 2012: "the program has outlived its usefulness". In that light, where can I find the data proving that the  Drive Clean program significantly improves air quality like it boasts about? Why should I be required to adhere to such policies if the government does not monitor the actual effectiveness of the measures it imposes on its citizens? Maybe it does monitor something but there is no up-to-date data available or it's hard to access. The Auditor added: "They’re going after the low-lying fruit in order to try to deal with the politics of this issue and not the practicalities of the issue". Almost five years have passed now. What has your government done since to review the Drive Clean program? It seems that the government of Ontario is trying to pin the price tag on small players in the preservation of our environment. Although the program does not prove to be a significantly effective initiative, the government does not take in account the Auditor's advice to dismiss the program or replace it entirely by real incentive measures. 
  
The Drive Clean program is only targeting the most populated areas, and therefore it is a discriminatory factor. Passing a test every second year for only part of the residents of Ontario in the effort to combat global pollution is unrealistic. As an example, if I lived in rural area just west of Ottawa, I would not have to submit my car to any emission testing. How is it logical that a region located west of a city does not have to comply while everybody knows that dominant winds do come from the west? Your program's geographical criteria allows the untested vehicle’s pollutants released into those winds, to be transported over the most populated areas. How cynical is that? I can not consciously agree with such unfounded and discriminatory criteria. In addition, if it were a light-duty commercial farm vehicle, I would be exempt from testing it. Here we can understand that commercial farms while in direct contact with the food chain, can use polluting vehicles without any restriction, and this is acceptable according to your program's criteria. The Auditor's report mentioned that "it eases economic burden on farmers", even though vehicle expenses are deductible from their taxes, it is just a smoke screen in my point of view. To be cohesive with its pollution reduction goal, the Drive Clean program should either be applied to every type of vehicle across Canada or none. The pollution problematic is a national issue not just a provincial one and since British Columbia just terminated their similar emission-test program, it seems like better initiatives can be put in place to really attack the smog issue at its root. 
  
My new car being older than 7 years but not over 25 years old makes it obligatory to have its emissions tested to comply with the  Drive Clean program. This means that if I prefer to buy a used car in order to save the environment in my own way by re-using existing cars to hinder car production's pollution, I am penalized because it might emit a little more pollutants than a newer vehicle. Knowing the fact that manufacturing a new car generates a carbon footprint between 6 to 35 tons of CO2 or if you prefer, the equivalent of what it will consume during its lifespan, this criteria becomes questionable since it does not account for the carbon footprint as part of the equation. We are being told by the government and the media that we should change our habits in order to reduce our individual footprint and on the other side, we are encouraged to get new cars with improved emission-control systems but avoid mentioning the additional carbon footprint being generated. This also implies that people, who can't afford new cars or overpriced hybrid-electric vehicles, have to pay more for their family vehicle’s registration. This is an additional hidden discriminatory fee that affects mostly the poorer portion of the population. 
  
If a new vehicle is sold after only one year, it must have an other emission test performed by the new owner even though emission testing is ordered every two years. How is it that cars have to be tested every two years? Don't your respective ministries question the reasons why parts of emission systems do not have a longer lifespan or reliability? The Drive Clean program transfers the responsibility of a polluting vehicle from the big corporations to consumers. This facilitates the obsolescence of car parts rather than holding the car industry accountable for profiting financially in manufacturing polluting vehicles and emission systems which have created, in the long run, a series of collateral damages to the climate, the environment and the public's health. 
  
Why not reverse the burden and make it mandatory for car manufacturers to produce zero emission vehicles from now on? The government can create new sustainable markets accessible to a majority of Ontarians by putting in place new policies to facilitate the implementation of electric motors across Ontario and make it easy to replace polluting vehicles' gas engines by electrical motors. These different measures can make our dependency on oil obsolete and create a new futuristic economy. Since the federal government just awarded Ontario's car industry a 100 million dollars, maybe it would be a good idea to use a big part of it to implement such measures and this way, make Ontario an example for the rest of the country? At the moment, we seem to have oil driven governments which do not want to let go of an old dirty habit that is unsustainable and an unfriendly environmental orientation. Recently, the United Nations even pointed to Canada's emissions to be amongst the worst in the world next to China and India. To the best of my conscience, I do not believe that the Drive Clean program is the solution for this elephant in the room. 
  
In fact there is not one, but a herd of elephants in the room when we talk about pollution emissions and schemes, climate change, environment, public health and safety. How do these terms relate? Actually they are all being bullied or destroyed by big corporations' ambitions, human activities and greed. It seems that laws are now designed for corporations' interests instead of the citizens' basic right to a safe and clean environment. 
  
There is a big emphasis on your respective ministry's website regarding smog preventing policies, so I researched the word smog. It is described as the conjuncture of the words smoke and  fog, and defined as: "smoke or other atmospheric pollutants combined with fog in an unhealthy or irritating mixture". 

Smog is known for causing multiple health issues and the World Health Organization even declared pollution a carcinogen. The government of Ontario drafted an adaptation strategy and action plan titled "Climate Ready". In this plan most of the strategy has to do with our adaptation to climate change, it is mentioned: "(…) the government of Ontario is taking measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also recognizes the need to adapt to the unavoidable impacts of changing weather patterns resulting from heat-trapping gases already in the atmosphere.(…)"

To write"unavoidable impacts" and  "already in the atmosphere" are two biased statements by themselves mainly because they suppose a natural occurrence of the phenomenon when in fact, it is mostly manly introduced using aircrafts amongst other means that is without counting the residues left by multiple ozone depletingnuclear tests conducted in the upper atmosphere over many years, which are still there but no one dares remembering this part. 
  
Almost every day there are aircrafts passing over my residence and most of them leave pollution trails, light or dark. They stay still, they don't dissipate, they spread and finally smear the sky. Very often the planes pass right in front of the sun, preventing me from seeing clear sunsets for the past few years. To top it off, most airplanes don't even respect the official flying zones. See the annex (below present letter) for pictures of this pollution seemingly shaped as clouds. I saw somebody talking about climate change and explaining how they were actually trying to control the weather by polluting the stratosphere with sulfuric acid. In other words, this "climate expert" advises governments to cool off the climate by spraying pollution containing acid because in the end it is the cheapest way around. What? First of all, basic science shows that what goes up must come down. Following this simple principle, it means that the earth is now littered with nano size particles of chemicals coming from those weather alteration projects. I investigated about these trails and they are part of climate geoengineering programs which use different processes such as stratospheric aerosolssolar radiation managementcloud seedinghail suppressionhurricane dissipation, some of the ways to defy natural weather using chemicals and radio signals, a godlike power. The electromagnetic signals by themselves disturb the natural earth's balance frequency and therefore humans' equilibrium which by itself is electro-magnetic pollution, but that is another subject. 
  
Many government papers do mention these projects. The same people advising lawmakers are the ones who own the companies which capture and store the CO2 gases. On one hand your government obliges me to have my cars pass emission tests in order to reduce pollution and on the other hand, the Ontario government sponsors climate engineering schools and projects that specifically spray more pollution. In resume, governments are giving the authorization to pollute, then invest in capturing the pollution they help put up in the first place and finally charge the ordinary citizens through the Drive Clean program. Why is this allowed? Where is the government's accountability? It looks quite convenient for the oil industry to be able to get rid of the sulfuric residue to be put up in the atmosphere, block the sun rays and reduce the solar systems efficiency, in a period where sun powered energy is proving worldwide to be more efficient and reliable than the unsustainable fossil and  nuclear energies. Germany proved it last year and gave energy away. 
  
Recently Mrs. Wynne and Mr. Murray announced a  carbon pricing plan, coming up in the spring, to fight climate change. This in my opinion, is an unsustainable, nonscientifically defendable in addition to be a poor environmental choice with a lack of vision, no offence. Not only it does not encourage better practices by the polluting industries, it only serves a corporate image to lure the public with the impression that big polluters are paying their share too in the combat against global warming when in reality, carbon pricing is just an additional money-grab scheme designed to introduce new trading avenues with weather derivatives and the forecastingof the man-made weather they invested in. Polluting industries can keep on doing business as usual without any extra cost or effort to factually reduce CO2 emissions and prevent further warming of the planet. In other words, it is a  free ride on our grandkids or an ignominy towards younger generations. The actual difference between the big polluting industries and the ordinary citizen in this CO2 taxing scheme is that family vehicles are not allowed any emission while the real big polluting corporations can buy the right to pollute adding to the stock market are making money trading those COgases. 
  
Even if these projects are experimentalsecretmilitary, governmental or civil, no reason is good enough to try to play with nature because for every action there is a reaction somewhere else in the world. This way of dealing with the matter is a direct affront to the climate, a  great danger to the environment and all living creatures. Mother Nature would be much calmer without any man intervention and governments would save money just choosing this simple option. The worst part of these insane climate engineering projects is that no individual, nor corporation, nor governmental body is accountable for experimenting with the climate on a large scale without public acknowledgement, omitting the due public health effect assessments. What about moral and ethics? It is a direct violation with your own government's Environmental Protection Act which it bases their criteria upon to impose the Ontarian consumers the Drive Clean program to obtain legal vehicle registration. I consciously can not agree with emission testing on my cars while such attempts on human rights, health and the environment are permitted by the same instances ordering the Drive Clean program, it does not make sense. 
  
A tangible political will would implement real policies where industries are obliged to have zero emission otherwise they can not conduct business in Ontario. If corporations can generate billions of dollars in profits then they can easily invest in systems to effectively cut their own polluting emissions to zero if not, leave the ground for new innovative and clean energy sources. When there is a will, there is a way and here, all we need is the political courage to change direction in the carbon pricing and introduce incentive regulations at the root of the problem: big polluting industries and climate geoengineering. This is exactly the moment when emissions will dramatically drop and when the Drive Clean program can make some sense because for now, the government sponsors the biggest polluters and charges the little ones. 
  
Recent studies showed that most smog causing emissions have declined since the program started but underlined that emissions were no longer amongst the major domestic contributors to smog in Ontario. Already back in 2010, the Auditor's report stated that more than half of the pollutants present in Ontario came from the central United States. What did your respective ministries do upon this hard fact? Why are such assaults on our health and environment being tolerated by your government? How come this fact does not make the news headlines and does not occupy the hot topic list in the government's agenda? What actions have been taken since 2010 to prevent the United States from further polluting the atmosphere in Ontario? There have been international treaties and agreements signed by both Canada and the United States to prevent tampering with the weather: the Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) and the Agreement between the government of Canada and the government of the United States of America on Air Quality between the government of Canada and the government of the United States of America on Air Quality. With those agreements, there is supposed to be monitoring of the chemicals crossing our mutual borders and accountability for them. Who exactly surveils, oversees and enforces those agreements? 
  
In my conscience, I can not accept to pay for car emission testing considering your respective ministries are not preventing or sanctioning aircraft pollution nor industries' excessively huge emissions, especially by the oil sands' and the United States' activities. How about the nanoparticles used by climate geoengineering and those rejected by manufacturing companies, how are these smog causing particles measured, monitored and regulated by your government? Do you have the necessary equipment to even test nano size particles? 
  
Finally, last point to my objection is this: the  Drive Clean program generated 12 million dollars in profit back in 2010 and 19 million in 2013. At this rate, the government will have exceeded the program's projected revenue of 50 million dollars far sooner than 2018 as expected, if it's not the case already. This legal money-grab is a yet an other user fee disguised as a tax according to a 1998 Supreme Court of Canada's decision, it could even be considered an unlawful tax and therefore repayable. Since then, the government only lowered the maximum chargeable price for an emission test to $30. just five dollars less than previously charged while the price of $17,50 for retesting failed tests stayed unchanged. If the program made a profit of 19 millions in 2013, it means that Ontarians were overcharged. This contravenes with the government's role in revenue neutrality which means that a user fee should not exceed the cost to the government of providing the service. Why should I accept to pay for emission tests every two year when it is clear that the government is behaving like a private enterprise profiting illegally from its own policies? This is an additional reason for my refusal to have my cars' emissions tested in order to obtain legal registration. 
  
To conclude, I consciously can not agree with the basis of this mandatory emission test since it does not hold the road. Until the  Drive Clean program is revisited in its targeted vehicles and measures, until it shows measurable air improvement in a direct effect from the Drive Clean program itself, until climate geoengineering is addressed and made public and until the biggest polluters are obliged to limit their emissions to zero, I refuse any emission test to be performed on my vehicles and therefore consider my vehicles exonerated from the Drive Clean program requirement in order to obtain legal personal-use vehicle registrations for the province of Ontario. 
  
Your government should establish new ways of tackling climate change through new sustainable, futuristic, innovative and visionary legislation and projects, and terminate this obsolete Drive Clean program. Only then will you truly declare:

«Our government will build Ontario up. Ontario will be the best place to live, from childhood to retirement.» 

Thank you for taking the time to read and have a magnificient day. 

Chantal Dupuis 
Ottawa, On 

Source: Cybel Production

 

“Aerotoxic Syndrome” Is Affecting Airline Passengers And Crews

flight
Share

Approximately 50% of the air circulated in commercial aircraft interiors is compressed "outside" air. The toxic air that airline passengers and crew members are exposed to is finally being acknowledged. Though there are likely a number of factors contributing to the toxic cabin fumes, is there any reasonable doubt about the contamination posed by the constant atmospheric spraying which is the major component of global geoengineering? All aircraft that fly through the sprayed heavy metal and chemical mixes associated with climate engineering are exposing their crews and passengers to a very serious health threat. Since many of the elements used in the geoengineering programs are bioaccumulative, the damage is now truly starting to show up in regard to human health impacts in those who frequently fly.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Killing California, Climate Engineering Is Turning The State Into A Dust Bowl

Drought2
Share

California's water supply is being completely blockaded by a "ridiculously resilient ridge" of high pressure and the constant aerosol spraying of the skies over the once golden state. Both factors are a part of the ongoing global climate engineering/weather warfare programs. Is California just a "climate sacrifice zone"? Or a target for catastrophic drought creation to provide governmental powers the premise to take control of water rights and for other purposes of control and profit? The likely answer is all the above. The entire country and indeed the entire planet are under an all out weather warfare and biological warfare assault, this has been the case for a very long time (since the elements being sprayed are highly toxic, the biological contamination must be considered an aspect of these programs). The geoengineers control the skies, rain will not return for the West unless or until the weather makers allow it. How bad is the situation in California? The article below penned by James Lee from TABU is an excellent summary.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Engineered Winter, Engineered Drought

Earth
Share

Earth's climate system is being manipulated and forced in too many directions to comprehend. Governments around the globe are participating in the climate engineering not only over their own countries, there is also the weather warfare aspect between opposing countries. Those in pursuit of power have turned our once pristine blue skies into a battlefield. Geoengineering is nothing short of an all out assault against Nature. Truly untainted weather is non existent, deep blue skies are no more. From record snows to record heat and drought, all is now being manipulated by the ecologically devastating climate engineering programs. Each of us must continue to help sound the alarm on the geoengineering insanity so that when the population is forced to wake up (due to the rapidly accelerating devastation that is occurring), they will know just how horrifically they have been violated by those in power. Make your voice heard, share credible data with others, start "spot fires" of awareness wherever you go. The short video below outlines the ongoing engineered devastation.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Vaccinations And Lies

Vaccines
Share

Our whole reality is built with layer upon layer of lies. Society as a whole has until recently accepted the lies, but that reality is changing as the curtain of total deception is pulled back. Historically there seems to have been some good done by some vaccinations at some points in time, but what were the true facts even in those cases? When we see the degree to which mainstream medicine, government agencies, and elected officials are willing to lie, how can we trust what has been historically recorded as fact? When we have recently documented cases of vaccinations doing catastrophic and irreparable damage to people, and our officials categorically lie about this fact, are they not guilty of committing a crime? How bad is the synergistic toxicity between the vaccination ingredients and the toxic elements we are all inhaling from the ongoing toxic atmospheric spraying? Humanity is being systematically assaulted from countless directions by a power structure that is completely out of control. The population must wake up or face its own demise.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Another Blow to Antarctic Glacial Stability as Larsen C Ice Shelf Cracks Up

larsen-c-rift
Share

Source: Robert Scribbler

Larsen C rift

(Northern edge of Larsen C Ice Shelf is at significant risk of breaking off as a massive rift continues to open within it. The above image shows the rate of rift propagation since November of 2010. Image source: Cryosphere Discussions.)

There’s a 30 kilometer long and hundreds foot deep crack running through West Antarctica’s massive Larsen C ice shelf.

Climate Engineering Has Left Earth Perilously Exposed To Solar Flares

solar flare
Share

How much risk do solar flares or the even larger coronal mass ejections (CME's) pose to our planet and our very existence? The dangers are far greater than most can imagine. SIx and a half decades of climate engineering has decimated Earth's atmosphere and the natural protection that was once provided from it. Geoengineering has already left much of the planet exposed to very dangerous UV radiation levels due to the damage the constant spraying of particulates has done to the ozone layer. With our atmosphere in a weakened state, the risks from large solar flares and CME's is potentially cataclysmic. A solar event of significant scale could shut down electrical grids around the globe. This alone would wreak havoc on industrialized society, but there is an even bigger problem connected to this scenario. If the grids shut down for long enough, there are nuclear power plants around the globe that would not be able to cool down reactors. This could lead to 100 Fukushima type disasters or even more. This would be 'game over" for life on planet Earth. Industrialized society and the military industrial complex have constructed a scenario which has made cataclysm inevitable from many directions. The epitome of human insanity is reflected by the ongoing climate engineering. The article below provides more details on potentially dangerous solar activity that happened recently, and the risks posed by it.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Toxic Air And Forced Vaccinations, A Bad Mix

Vaccines
Share

All of us have long since been forced to inhale the toxic elements being sprayed in our skies, now those in power are going to try their best to force us all to be vaccinated. The known elements raining down on us from the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare are all highly toxic in and of themselves. But when these elements are combined, and at some point possibly mixed with the additional toxic elements in vaccinations, a truly lethal brew is the result. "Synergistic Toxicity" can increase overall toxicity by thousands of percentile points. Do you really want to have an unknown mixture of toxins injected into your body?
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Atmospheric Aerosols And Storm Manipulation

Cyclone
Share

"Official" agencies and the experts who work there like to pretend the massive aerosol loading of the atmosphere with aerosols is just the result of anthropogenic pollution. This is the story these agencies are paid to put out in order to perpetuate the "official denial" of the obvious ongoing aerosol spraying being done by jet aircraft day in and day out all over the world. Climate engineering is of course not the only source of particle pollution in our skies, but it is likely the largest single source by far (mathematically speaking). ALL weather is affected by unprecedented aerosol levels in the atmosphere. Even cyclones can and are being radically manipulated with the use of aerosols and ionosphere heater facilities. What impact do the geoengineering nano particulates have on extratropical cyclones? The article below gives further insight.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

“Conspiracy Theorists” Label Still Used In Spite Of Obvious And Verifiable Geoengineering Realities

Haarp2
Share

Populations have been very effectively programmed to respond in specific ways when they hear key terms. The term "conspiracy theorist" has so far been very successfully used to trigger a mental shutdown in most people. When an individual is labeled with this term by the media, anything they say (no matter how verifiably factual) is immediately marginalized. But what do psychological studies say about the sanity of "conspiracy theorists" as compared to those that blindly accept the "official narratives" without questioning? Those who question are sane, those who do not, are found to be psychologically lacking, this should not be a surprise. The article below and the 3 short videos contained in it are important to review. It is not conspiracy, but fact.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Geoengineering With Industrial Waste

Cal spraying
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Geoengineering The Oceans


Though many have now at least heard of the ongoing atmospheric spraying known as solar radiation management (SRM) and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG), most are still not familiar with another form of geoengineering, "ocean fertilization". It's easy enough for the average person to take note of the all too visible spraying of our skies, but how can we know what the climate engineers are doing to our oceans without our knowledge or consent? 

Connecting The Dots


Could the atmospheric spraying and ocean fertilization be directly connected? The answer is yes, a connection appears likely if all available data is examined. For those that are not familiar with ocean fertilization, the term refers to the intentional widespread distribution of bioavailable iron into our seas in order to create plankton blooms that then absorb and thus sequester Co2 from the atmosphere. Could the materials being sprayed into our skies and over the oceans be composed of elements that are compatible for ocean fertilization? Again, the answer is likely yes.

Climate Engineering And The Manipulated Perception Of The US Population

Spray77
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

(Updated) If you live in the eastern half of the North American continent you may be convinced that the planet is actually cooling instead of warming even though 2014 is officially the warmest year ever recorded on Earth. If you live on the east coast of the US would you believe that January 2015 was the warmest January ever recorded in the Northern Hemisphere? It was.Those that have come to the conclusion that the whole planet is cooling should carefully examine the map image below. This is a GISS "departure from normal temperature" map for the entire 2014 year. What does this map reveal? The darker the colors, the further above normal the average temperatures were for the 2014 year. The light colors reflect departures from average to the below normal side. Where was the most consistent anomalous cold region on the entire planet for the 2014 year? The eastern half of the North American continent. How can this be when most of the world is far above normal temperatures? Climate engineering, is how. The engineered cooling of the Eastern US is very much a psychological operation. Most people cannot accept the possibility of a warm world if it is cold where they live. How short many people's memories are considering 2012 was the warmest year ever recorded in the continental US by far. In fact there were 362 all time record high temperatures set in the US during 2012, there were ZERO all time record lows. Why is it so important to know the facts in regard to the true state of the climate? Because spreading the "global cooling" propaganda is exactly what the power structure and the geoengineers want us to do. To push the "global cooling" myth is in effect helping the geoengineers sell climate engineering as an effective method of climate mitigation when in reality the exact opposite is true. Climate engineering is making the climate scenario far worse overall, not better. Worse still, the ongoing climate engineering fallout is contaminating the entire planet with toxic metal and chemical particulates.

Monsanto’s “Roundup” And Aluminum, A Deadly Combination

Monsanto
Share

The more we learn about the toxic soup the power structure has immersed us all in, the more astounding it is that any of us still have even a shred of health left.  "Synergistic toxicity" is what happens when two elements that are already toxic become much more toxic when combined. Studies show this is the case when Monsanto's "Roundup" is combined with aluminum. The ongoing climate engineering programs are raining down huge amounts of aluminum (and other toxic metals and chemicals) on the entire surface of the planet which is being absorbed by all life forms. Now let's add more toxins to the mix, how much of our food supply is being exposed to Monsanto's "Roundup" chemical concoction? Yes, Monsanto has "Roundup ready crops" that are genetically engineered to resist the the toxic Roundup brew. This means farmers can spray all the Roundup they want on crops without harming their harvest, but what about us? A small circle of power brokers are quite literally "slow killing" us all from too many directions to quantify. How can this happen? Because of the abysmal complacency of populations that have so far not taken a stand. Once the masses fully realize their former reality is over, and why, the awakening will commence in earnest. It's up to all of us that are already aware to help awaken others. The article below will shed more light on the Monsanto/aluminum synergistic toxicity. 
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Exposing The Weather Channel Deception

sign
Share

The power structure owned Weather Channel is tasked with covering the tracks of the climate engineers and the completely manipulated and unnatural weather they create. Thankfully, a concerted and well organized effort has come together to expose the Weather Channel for what it is, a mechanism of mass deception to hide the climate engineering insanity. My most sincere thanks to former congressional candidate, Greg Pallen, and Marylou Harris for all they have done to sound the alarm on the critical geoengineering issue, and to former US congressional representative Cynthia McKinney for her help getting the word out with the video below.  Exposing the Weather Channel propaganda machine for what they are is a giant leap in the right direction.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Activist Videos Are Helping To Sound The Alarm

billboard1
Share

More and more anti-climate engineering activists are increasing their effectiveness in the critical effort to raise awareness. There are countless viable methods to help sound the alarm, making and posting videos is a primary one. My thanks to Jolie Diane for her latest contribution to the ongoing awareness effort. Her video is an informative compilation of information that connects many dots.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Study Shows Global Sea Ice Diminishing, Despite Antarctic Gains

nasastudysho
Share

Source: Phys.org

Comparing Arctic sea ice loss to Antarctic sea ice gain shows that the planet has-been shedding sea ice at an average annual rate of 13,500 square miles since 1979, the equivalent of losing an area of sea ice larger than the state of Maryland every year. Credit: NASA's Earth Observatory/Joshua Stevens and Jesse Allen

Sea ice increases in Antarctica do not make up for the accelerated Arctic sea ice loss of the last decades, a new NASA study finds. As a whole, the planet has been shedding sea ice at an average annual rate of 13,500 square miles (35,000 square kilometers) since 1979, the equivalent of losing an area of sea ice larger than the state of Maryland every year.

Climate Engineering Omnicide And The Criminals Who Help Hide It

spray55
Share

If you care about reason, justice, the planet, your children, yourself, or any other aspect of life on Earth, the 10 minute film clip below should fill you with justifiable anger. As awareness of the climate engineering insanity grows, so does the attempt by those in power to quench the growing fires of the awakening population. The "journalists" and disinformation site owners featured in this film will hopefully one day soon be held to account in a legal forum that should resemble the Nuremberg trials. Such cowardly and despicable individuals are all too willing to lie for a paycheck and a pension. They like to rant about the "conspiracy theorists" in the most derogatory tone, but what do psychologists say about the sanity of those who question as opposed to those who blindly parrot the official narrative? Studies show clearly that those who question are much more sane, what a surprise. The mainstream media disinformation in the video below tries to convince us that everything we see in the sky is just "contrails", but does this lie hold up to hard facts? What the disinformation people in this film did not tell you is that all commercial jets and military tankers have "high bypass turbofan" jet engines which is by design incapable of producing "condensation trails" except under the most extreme conditions. Did they mention the mountain of government documents and science reports on "solar radiation management" (SRM)? No, they did not even mention the term as that would have given credibility to this issue and that's the last thing they want. They show film footage of WWll B-17 bombers leaving condensation trails, but they did not tell you that these bombers had water vapor injection systems on them in addition to the very crude piston engines that put out a tremendous amount of particulate matter. Their entire video is filled with direct lies and lies of omission. If you want to make a difference in the battle to expose and halt global geoengineering, take the time to contact the two primary perpetrators in this mainstream disinformation piece and let them know you are not OK with them lying about the climate engineering crimes that will cost your children any chance for a future if these programs continue. One is Mark Allin from ATS (Above Top Secret). ATS is controlled and funded by William Irvine who has reported CIA connections. Then there is George Knapp, from Channel 8 news, who avoids completely the mountain of science relating to geoengineering and solar radiation management like the long list of patents and global governance documents. If you care about your future and that of your children, make your voice heard. Let those who lie for a paycheck and a pension know that you are not OK with their part in the cover-up of the covert climate engineering crimes. 
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Climate Engineering, How It Changed My World

kids
Share

By Nancy Levant, contributing writer for geoengineeringwatch.org

Soon I will be turning 60, and I cannot help but recall my mother’s words when she told me she felt as if she had outlived her understanding of how the world worked.  She was in her eighties when she explained this sadness, and I felt this must surely be a common feeling in eldership, and I felt deeply sorry for her.  Little did I know that I would feel much the same at sixty.

I grew up in a time when kids left the house at 8:00 a.m. and stayed outside all day minus the run-ins for lunch and dinner.  We rode bikes everywhere and miles and miles from home.  We went trekking through miles and miles of woods and tried to get lost so that we could make our ways back with tremendous pride in our outdoor skills.  We made creek rafts out of sticks and leaves, climbed every climbable tree, and we made forts out of deer thickets and snow.

Chemchasers – SMOKE & MIRRORS Chemtrail REALITY Show

chemchasers
Share

HAARP Still Stands, Geoengineers Still Wreaking Havoc

HAARP2
Share

In the spring of 2014, the power structure and mainstream media tried to convince an ever more concerned population that there was no climate modification going on and as proof they cited the claim that the HAARP facility was going to be "bulldozed". Some of us never bought into the smoke and mirrors about HAARP being torn down, and as we now see, it is still standing. The climate engineering insanity continues to decimate our planet as the weather makers try desperately to hide the damage already done by further ramping up the very programs that caused much of the damage in the first place. The frantic attempt to cool down some of the most populated regions in the US is ongoing. Jet stream manipulation and toxic chemical ice nucleation are the two primary tools being used to create the temporary surface cold zones in a rapidly warming world. The mainstream media then sensationalizes the engineered winter storms in their attempt to further confuse and divide populations in regard to the true state of the climate. This buys time for those in power as they prepare for total collapse. The single greatest blow we could strike against those in power is to expose the climate engineering crimes, this would galvanize and unite populations around the globe against the cabal of insanity that is running the planet. Make your voice heard, pass on credible information about climate engineering on to others, every day counts in this battle.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Is The Whole Solar System Warming? No

Solar System
Share

Many claim that the whole solar system is warming, but is this really the case? What does available science tell us about this conclusion? I have had many make this claim to me, but none have yet been able to offer a single bit of science to substantiate the "whole solar system is warming" claim. So what does the science say?
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

The Consequences Of Geoengineering, 10 Critical Points

sky7
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Governments around the globe long ago made the decision to alter and manipulate Earth's weather and climate systems. This decision was made without the knowledge or consent of the public. Some of the agendas behind the diliberate manipulation of Earth's life support systems are clear (based on available data). One major objective is weather warfare. The US militray has stated its desire to "Own The Weather By 2025", and there are numerous historical examples of weather warfare such as "Project Popye" in Vietnam. An even greater aspect of the atmospheric manipulation is the attempt to slow down what may already be a "runaway greenhouse effect" on our planet. What are the known consequences of the climate engineering insanity? The 10 bullet points below should be considered.

Alzheimer’s Association Denies Aluminum Connection

Alzheimer's
Share
In late 2014, the Alzheimer’s Association held a large fundraising event in Northern California. GeoengineeringWatch.org tried to sponsor this event with a $500 dollar donation which should have allowed us to have an informational booth at the event. The Alzheimer’s Association flatly refused to accept our offer to contribute. They made it clear that their organization does not recognize any connection between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease and they did not want anyone distributing credible science data pointing out this connection to those attending their event. GeoengineeringWatch attended anyway with numerous activists in order to distribute informational videos and flyers, the attached 3 minute video documents this. For those that want to read the full article on this event (which includes the letter of denial from the Alzheimer’s Association), please click the following link: Alzheimer’s Association Refuses To Allow GeoengineeringWatch.org To Sponsor Their Event.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

How Dark Is The Horizon?

Horizon-300x228
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Denial is the prevalent theme of the human race. We now live under skies that often look like something from another planet, but how many will admit anything is wrong? The environment that sustains life on our planet is collapsing on every front, how many have even noticed? In the last 40 years the human population has doubled while the global wildlife populations have been been more than cut in half. Nuclear contamination catastrophe's, oil spill disasters, fracking, mass fish and animal die-off, does the general public even care? So far the answer is no. More jobs, more expansion, less restrictions on business, these are the themes that occupy the narrative. The human race is already reaping what it has sown. Yes, the power structure has laid out the paradigm that has brought us to this dark place, but a huge segment of the population must also bear responsibility for being all too willing to participate in the insanity and to remain in ignorance in regard to all that is unfolding. There are two videos below. The first is from University of Arizona Professor Emeritus Guy McPherson.

Lord Monckton, Ardent Geoengineering Denier

lord-monckton
Share

Lord Monckton is an ardent denier of the blatant climate engineering reality occurring in skies around the globe every day, so why would so many in the anti-climate engineering community post Monckton’s rants? Because too many are not doing real research on the bigger picture but are rather marching forward with opinions based on bias, ideology, and preconception. Hard facts help our cause, the former personality traits mentioned do not. Because so many hate Al Gore (for good reason) they will post anyone that has an opposing view to Gore, but is this reasonable? If Gore said the world was round, should we take the position that it is flat? If activists in the anti-geoengineering fight expect others to actually investigate the spraying of our skies, are not we responsible for also having a solid basis for our opinions? Many activists also cite The Weather Channel founder, John Coleman, as a source of credible information even though Coleman has labeled the anti-geoengineering community “tin foil hat wearing nutcases”. Again, I would ask, why would anyone in the anti-climate engineering community post the rants from such a person? Again, the answer is this, because Coleman disputes Gore and the reality of our changing climate. Monckton and Coleman are both former journalists, neither even claim to have spent significant time in solid and extensive research on the climate or geoengineering. The video below is exposes Lord Monckton in many ways. Monckton admits he is “not an expert on the atmosphere” but yet he claims to know that what we see in our skies are only “contrails”. Why would anyone who claims to be against climate engineering post the baseless opinions of individuals like Monckton? Opinions and ideology must be exchanged for research and hard facts.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Love Canal Tragedy Remembered Decades Later As History Repeats Itself In Riverview Florida

toxic-water-florida
Share

By Rebel Siren

(Click here for the full article)

Love Canal became the subject of national and international attention after it was revealed in the press that the site had formerly been used to bury 22,000 tons of toxic waste by Hooker Chemical Company (now Occidental Petroleum Corporation).

The city of Niagara Falls began using the land as a landfill for chemical waste disposal and later the U.S. Army began burying waste from chemical warfare experiments. The Hooker Chemical and Plastics Corporation acquired the use of the site for private use in 1947 and buried 21,000 tons of toxic waste there over the next five years. After the site was filled, Hooker sold the Love Canal for one dollar to the Niagara Falls School Board in 1953, and the land was approved for residential use.

“Thirty-five years after Love Canal became a symbol of the dangers of toxic waste in residential neighborhoods, the legal and medical issues there are still playing out.”

What Is The True State Of The Biosphere, Do You Trust Your Own Eyes?

melting-ice
Share

How does one cut through the fog of endless disinformation in regard to the true state of the climate? Are the planet's glaciers melting? Or are they growing? Would you believe the truth if you could see it with your own eyes? The multiple award winning documentary film "Chasing Ice" has just been publicly posted, now all can see for themselves what is happening at an extremely alarming rate all over our planet. We are all in uncharted waters, the gravity of our collective reality is much more dire than almost any yet comprehend. If the planet is to have any chance of continuing to maintain life, the industrialized destruction of the biosphere must stop, starting with the immediate halting of climate engineering. All those that are truly committed to the fight against climate engineering need to take the time to educate themselves on reality. In the case of the planet's glaciers, this documentary reveals visually verifiable and indisputable facts. We must learn to recognize spun propaganda put out by the most powerful people and special interest groups in the world whose goal it is to hide reality from the public for as long as possible. How can we recognize false propaganda? By knowing what the truth really is. Though much of the statistical information in the film is very dire, the up to the minute statistics are already much worse. I hope all will take the time to view this extraordinary documentary. If we are to have the credibility necessary to gain ground in the fight against climate engineering, our conclusions must stand on solid ground.
Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers