On Friday, October 7th, 2016, GeoengineeringWatch.org and the Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering (LASG) carried out a simple survey that involved 1518 climate scientists and experts. The survey message headline sent to the scientists/experts was titled "Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering Survey". Below is the very simple and straight forward survey statement sent out to 1518 climate scientists/experts by GeoengineeringWatch and the LASG team. This survey was worded in a specific fashion for a reason. The climate science community has systematically claimed that geoengineering prograns are only a "proposal". But what happens when this community is asked in to state their denial on the record?
The subject of climate engineering has become a frontline conversation in countless circles of academia and with governments around the globe. You may be aware of the rapidly building controversy over climate engineering/geoengineering and whether or not these programs have already been deployed.
The Legal Alliance To Stop Geoengineering (LASG) is conducting a survey in an attempt to bring clarification to this controversial issue. With this objective in mind, we would be grateful if you could give a simple yes or no answer to the following question:
Can you confirm for us that geoengineering programs HAVE NOT yet been deployed by the United States government? Such programs would include (but not be limited to) solar radiation management (SRM), stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG), cloud albedo enhancement (CAE), or stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI).
We appreciate your consideration of the very important question posed in this survey. If we do not receive a response to the simple survey question we will assume (for the purposes of the survey) that as an expert/scientist on weather and climate you are not willing to state that climate engineering/geoengineering/solar radiation management programs have not yet been deployed by the US government.
Thank you for your consideration of this most important attempt to add clarification to the climate engineering/geoengineering controversy.
Of the 1518 academicians solicited, 970 of the scientists/experts did not open this survey/inquiry. Was thier reluctance due to the stated survey subject and their unwillingness to address the geoengineering issue publicly? Possibly because to do so would be at minimum a bad career decision? Or is the illegal federal "gag order" on all National Weather Service and all NOAA employees the bottom line with their silence? 34 of the scientists/experts immediately "unsubscribed" (possibly for the same reason that 970 did not even open the survey). Another 34 of the survey inquiries were not deliverable. But, 584 of the scientists/experts did open the climate engineering survey message. Of all 584, only one was initially willing to deny the climate engineering/geoengineering/solar radiation management reality on the record (he subsequently refused to confirm his initial answer, more on that below). So, the final summary is this, 100% of scientists/experts surveyed REFUSED to deny the climate engineering reality on the record. How much longer can the climate engineering atrocities be hidden from the public in plain sight? When will the so called "scientists and experts" show the courage to tell the truth to the population they claim to represent?
Geoengineered skies over Chippewa, Pennsylvania. Photo credit: Buddy Revell
When the hard science terms are used in a study or survey (such as the one that was just carried out), the willingness of academicians to lie or deny about the issue radically dissipates. Terms like solar radiation management (SRM), stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG), cloud albedo enhancement (CAE), or stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). Again, in the case of this survey, virtually none of the scientists surveyed were willing to deny the climate engineering reality on the record, none.
Internationally known climate scientist Alan Robock was one of a number of respondents to the survey. Below is a previous quote from Mr. Robock that is important to consider within the context of this article.
But there are at least 26 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. These include disruption of the Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing precipitation to the food supply for billions of people; ozone depletion; no more blue skies; reduction of solar power; and rapid global warming if it stops.
– Alan Robock, Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences,
Rutgers University, 2013
Now let's get to climate scientist Alan Robock's actual reply to the simple and straight forward GeoengineeringWatch survey question.
That's a ridiculous question. I don't know of any such programs, but how can I be sure that they don't exist. It is impossible to prove that something does not exist.
Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor
Editor, Reviews of Geophysics
Department of Environmental Sciences Phone: +1-848-932-5751
Rutgers University Fax: +1-732-932-8644
14 College Farm Road
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 USA
Is Mr. Robock's reply believable? Are we really to accept that this world renowned climate scientist is completely unaware of "any such programs"? Having met Alan Robock at an AAAS international geoengineering science conference in 2010 (along with geoengineer David Keith), I have long since been convinced of his total lack of honesty.
What response did our simple and honest survey get from two UCAR scientists? (UCAR is the "University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. This organization gets almost 100% of its funding from the federal government).
UCAR scientist/expert Andrew Swartz said this:
As an expert/scientist I can confirm beyond a doubt that you people are idiots.
Andrew Schwartz: email@example.com
Another UCAR scientist/expert, Reid Doyle, said exactly the same:
As an expert/scientist I can confirm beyond a doubt that you people are idiots.
Reid Doyle: firstname.lastname@example.org
Anyone reading this post that takes issue with this kind of attitude from a "climate scientist/expert" (on such a critically important issue that is so drastically affecting us all) should take the time to let these scientists know what you think.
Another scientist/expert from the UK, Guy Gratton, said this:
I am not in the USA, and I do not support your group's objectives. Your approach to carrying out research is also superficial.
Gratton, Guy B.: email@example.com
Apparently Mr. Gratton needed a more complex question to make him feel better about his refusal to deny the climate engineering reality.
For the record, there was one UCAR scientist/expert (from the whole 1500 +) that initially sent back his survey question with a checked box for the following question:
Yes, as an expert/scientist I can confirm that global atmospheric geoengineering programs have not yet been deployed.
Roelof Bruintjes: firstname.lastname@example.org
LASG administration then sent the follow up message below just to confirm the survey answer from Mr. Bruintjes:
Hello Roelof, thank you for your reply to our survey on Geoengineering. Of the over 1500 academicians surveyed, you are so far the only scientist to state/claim that you can confirm global geoengineering/solar radiation management/stratospheric aerosol injection programs have NOT already been deployed. Before we publicly post your name and statement of record, we want to be sure this is your official posititon on the climate engineering issue. Can you please confirm with us that you know global geoengineering programs have NOT already been deployed.
Thank you in advance for your pending reply.
Administration, Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering
No confirmation response ever came from Roelof Bruintjes.
This survey was undertaken as a counter response to the completely illegitimate propaganda "science study" (conducted by geoengineer Ken Caldeira and "Carnegie Science") which claimed "Chemtrails Not Real". Geoengineering Watch easily and completely de-bunked Caldeira's baseless study (survey). Of course the power structure controlled corporate mainstream media empire published the Caldeira and "Carnegie Science" disinformation in all their mainstream media outlets, no questions asked. Since the "chemtrails" term has no validity or basis in any science context of forum, it was possible for geoengineer Ken Caldeira to find a few academicians that were willing to deny the subject of "chemtrails". For the record, 84% of the scientists Caldeira surveyed were unwilling to deny even the "chemtrail" term on the record and thus never responded to Caldeira. Caldeira and Carnegie Science surveyed 450 scientists about the validity of the non-science "chemtrail" term/issue, only 76 individuals (16%) responded that "chemtrails did not exist", one said he could not be sure. Again, "chemtrail" is not a science term, it means virtually nothing scientifically. Caldeira knows this and that is, of course, exactly why he and "Carnegie Science" used the term for their completely propagandistic false study. As should be expected, Caldeira and "Carnegie Science" never clearly disclosed the fact that 84% of the scientists they surveyed never responded. The Caldeira Carnegie study was simply power structure backed baseless disinformation. It is important to note that ALL of the climate scientists/experts that publicly denied "chemtrails" in the Caldeira Carnegie "study/survey" (76 total) were included with in this LASG survey. Not one of these scientists was willing to deny climate engineering when the science terms were used.
To verify the validity of the LASG survey/study that was just performed, we are posting the entire list of scientists and experts that were a part of the survey. Their names and official email addresses are in the PDF below. The public is encouraged to communicate with these scientists and experts about the climate engineering issue. The forwarding of credible climate engineering data to these scientists/experts will assist with the effort to fully expose the ongoing geoengineering atrocities. Sharing and forwarding credible information with these scientists/experts also helps to further eliminate their ability to ever publicly deny that geoengineering is already a reality.
Click the PDF file icon for the extremely extensive list of climate scientists and experts surveyed. We were not able to get a single one of the nearly 1500 scientists/experts shown in the file below (with their contacts) to deny the climate engineering reality. If anyone is able to obtain an on the record denial from any of them, please let us know.
Exposing and halting the ongoing climate engineering assault is the great imperative of our time. The unwillingness of the climate science community to tell the truth about climate engineering is inexcusable. Once the public is fully awakened to the geoengineering crimes (and the irreparable damage that has been done to them from these programs), will the scientists and experts that have helped to hide these crimes then be held legally and morally responsible? Will those in the corporate media who helped to perpetuate the deception also be held accountable? Time will soon enough reveal the answer to these questions. All of us are needed in the critical battle to sound the alarm, make your voice heard. Reaching a critical mass of public awareness is the only way forward in this fight.
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.
Hiding the severity and immediacy of countless converging catastrophes from populations (until the last possible moment) remains a top priority for the global power structure. The NOAA "departure from normal high temperatures" map below covers the period from October 16th through the 20th. NOAA modeling is done by private defense/geoengineering contractor, Raytheon, thus their "forecasts" amount to the scheduled weather. Every color tier reflects a 2-3 degree "departure from normal" to the high side or low side, depending on the color hue. If the profound imbalance of temperatures shown in this map does not alarm you, it should. While record high temperatures are being set throughout much of the country (and the world as a whole), the US West Coast and parts of Alaska are temporarily (and toxically) cooled off by a massive plume of moisture (snow is even falling in the Western US). Atmospheric aerosol spraying (including chemical ice nucleation elements) are being dispersed by jet aircraft as the ongoing climate engineering operations further derail Earth's weather and life support systems.
Record setting high, summer like, temperatures will continue into the week for much of the US.
At the same time that record high temperatures being set in so much of the US, snow is miraculously falling in other parts of the lower 48 states. Snow is occurring (due to chemical ice nucleating elements) in some locations in spite of above freezing temperatures and in spite of warmer flows of moisture off of the record warm Pacific Ocean. Snow (shown in blue on the map below) is cleary showing up across the Western US.
As the climate engineers continue to force the climate system to ever greater extremes of temperature imbalances, the biosphere's ability to cope is rapidly breaking down. In addition to the temperature extremes, there is the issue of the highly toxic geoengineering/solar radiation management fallout that is contaminating the entire surface of the planet and every breath we take. The "departure from normal high temperature" map below reflects variances from "normal" temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit. These imbalances are already far beyond extreme and growing worse rapidly.
As the moisture flows in from the coast, the air masses below it are cooled by the aerosol/ice nucleating dispersions already mentioned (chemical ice nucleated events are occuring all over the globe). The same aerosols (which are manipulated with radio frequency transmissions) have the effect of scattering the moisture into vast expanses of largely rainless cloud cover. This is the stated goal of solar radiation management (SRM). The sun blocking aerosolized clouds, of course, also trap heat (in addition to countless other negative effects) which further fuels the overall planetary meltdown. The planet is already warming at a "runaway" pace with nightime low temperatures rising even faster than daytime highs. The brighter the white of the cloud cover shown in the combination satellite radar image shown below, the more aerosolized the cloud cover is.
The constant aerosol saturation of the moisture flows, as they approach from the west, continues to rob desperately needed rain from California. The US Drought Monitor map below does not begin to reflect the true severity of the drought and the decimation it is causing.
Why are National Weather Service and NOAA employees completely completely mute on the subject of climate engineering? Illegal federal gag orders have ensured their silence. Global climate engineering is weather warfare, and biological warfare, nothing less. Geoengineering is not mitigating the overall planetary warming, it is actually fueling it. In their increasingly desperate attempt to mask the unfolding climate crisis from the public, the climate engineers are tearing Earth's life support systems apart. Our battle for survival is here, and now. Help us with the critical battle to sound the alarm, every day counts.
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.
The US/NATO quest for total global dominance continues to move forward while it is simultaneously fracturing from within. The US supported ally, Saudi Arabia, has just added to it's growing mountain of dead civilians by slaughtering a funeral gathering in Yemen. Former US allies, like the Philippines, are kicking the US military out of their country. Many other nations are rapidly descending into chaos. The geoengineers are flowing moisture into the Western US but have so far syphoned off much of it with a constant aerosol spraying assault. The atmospheric aerosol saturation (and radio frequency transmissions) broadcasts the moisture out into massive expanses of largely rainless cloud cover. Welcome to solar radiation management which is worsening the overall warming of the planet, not mitigating it. And for those who have bought into "the more Co2, the better" equation, a new study now proves that trees and plants have long since passed their peak ability to absorb this greenhouse gas. The latest addition of Global Alert News is below.
Apathy and angst will not save us, only properly prioritized collective action can yet make a difference. Each and every one of us can have a profound impact for the better on the overall paradigm, we simply need to try. Make your voice heard.
The battle to expose and halt climate engineering is gaining momentum rapidly. The presentation of credible and compelling data relating to climate engineering/geoengineering/solar radiation management is essential if the currently unaware population is to be awakened to the ongoing atmospheric spraying assault. The 2 minute video below is a preview for a soon to be released shocking documentary exposé of the covert global climate engineering programs along with other converging threats that we collectively face. The documentary film title is "No One Gets Out Alive".
This documentary provides a mountain of indisputable data that is very clearly and thoroughly presented. Aerosol dispersion types and methods, radio frequency manipulation of the atmospheric aerosols, who is involved with the programs and why, all are addressed and disclosed. "No One Gets Out Alive" will be available to the public in 2017. Though the film has already been completed, it will first be submitted to multiple film festival events. This documentary will provide a very powerful tool for effectively waking the masses to the climate engineering insanity that is occurring over our heads every single day (and other critical issues/threats that we collectively face). "No One Gets Out Alive" was directed by Walter Schmidt, a very dedicated individual that has devoted himself to the fight against climate engineering. I wish to express my most sincere gratitude to Walter for his tireless research and work on this essential documentary.
You’ve probably heard about “chemtrails,” or more accurately, geoengineering, but is it real or just some far-fetched conspiracy theory? In this interview, Dane Wigington, who is, in my view, probably the top expert on this topic, lays out the evidence for what he believes to be one of the most serious threats to humanity.
“The media will try to always use the chemtrail term, which is not a science-based term. If your listeners were to investigate this issue … it’s imperative to use the science terms “climate engineering”, “solar radiation management” [and] “aerosol geoengineering". "Those are the science terms that lead to a mountain of science data so that they understand that this issue has complete validity,” Wigington explains.
A Most Obscure Yet Well Documented Program
Wigington, who lives completely off the grid on a mountaintop in Northern California, has been interviewed on the topic of geoengineering a numberous times, and I’ve been impressed with his ability to very precisely articulate what this issue entails and the dangers it poses.
But what brought him to become an expert on such an obscure topic as geoengineering?
“I have a background in renewable energy. I was a former Bechtel Power employee. Bechtel is the largest engineering firm on the planet and they are not a reputable firm, in my opinion. I left at an early age because of things that I saw in the company.
They are comparable to, for example, Halliburton. Many of your listeners might be familiar with Halliburton, but being on the renewable energy end, this is what brought me to this issue.
I moved to the Pacific North West, built a large off-grid home. My home was the cover of the largest renewable energy magazine. Then I began to lose massive amounts of my solar photovoltaic (PV) uptake from whatever these aircrafts were emitting, which was blotting out the sun, literally. Clearly this was not condensation… I was losing 70 to 80 percent of my solar PV uptake from what these aircrafts were emitting.
When I began to research, I was astounded that I didn’t already know about this issue because there’s a mountain of data that confirm global solar radiation management programs had been deployed for many decades already.”
Toxic Rain Provides a Clue
First, he began to lab test the rain falling on his property to confirm whether the same materials listed in climate engineering patents were indeed coming down the air column. One initial precipitation test contained 7 parts per billion (ppb) of aluminum. Over the following 18 months, that level skyrocketed by nearly 50,000 percent, to 3,500 ppb of aluminum in a single rain event.
“At that point, I was faced with the fact that these programs were going on in Northern California,” Wigington says.
“The California Air Resources Board has confirmed that these materials were not coming from China. There was simply no other source for these materials, given that they were the primary element in climate engineering patents.
I was faced with the reality that these programs were going on over my head and the toxic materials were raining down on everything that I loved… being inhaled [by myself and my children] with every breath … So I simply had to face this battle.”
The Why Behind the Madness
So what’s the motivation for spraying toxic elements like aluminum into the atmosphere? Who is responsible for initiating this kind of project, seeing how it can have global implications for both human and environmental health?
Clearly, there must be a reason, but what is it? These are questions that many struggle with and that make some dismiss the notion that it’s actually taking place. To many, it just seems too incomprehensible and irresponsible to be true.
“The stated purpose behind solar radiation management is to try to deflect some of the sun’s incoming thermal radiation to slow global warming,” Wigington explains.
“What they’re attempting to do is to mimic what happens when a volcanic eruption goes off. For example, in 1992, Mt. Pinatubo put enough material in the air to reduce global temperatures about half a degree Celsius, about 1 degree Fahrenheit.
This is the state of attempt; to try to mimic that cooling effect by filling the atmosphere with light-scattering particles, again, to try to block some of the sun’s incoming thermal radiation. But just like the pharmaceutical approach on the human body, you have a massive amount of downstream negative effects from filling the atmosphere with particulates.”
Geoengineering Has Many Downstream Effects
According to scientific studies, the particulates dispersed during these geoengineering events “shred” the ozone layer. They also disrupt the hydrological (rain) cycle, which leads to another host of downstream effects, and this is in addition to spreading toxins across the entire planet surface.
“There’s a list that is so long of negative effects that it’s hard to fathom there would be any perceived benevolence in these programs,” he says.
“But also, we have to look at this: weather manipulation is a weapon, period.
We see example after example of weather being used as a weapon, not just going back to conflicts just like Vietnam where we had project Popeye, we also had project Stormfury.” These are weather warfare programs of record, but other events are also suspect. For example, certain sub-Saharan African countries have been exposed to unprecedented droughts.
Moreover, while global cooling is the stated aim of most of these geoengineering programs, as the planet warms, the laws of physics state you get MORE precipitation to cool it, not less, because the atmosphere carries more moisture as the temperature rises — 7 percent more moisture for each degree of Fahrenheit, to be exact.
To cool the planet, you need to create more rain, but these programs have resulted in less rain, and the reason for the reduction in rain fall is due to the particulates in the atmosphere. In addition to deflecting heat from the outside, these particles also TRAP heat down below, making the overall heating of the planet significantly worse. With this in mind, is combating global warming really the endgame, or is that just a convenient cover story for a far more reckless goal?
A number of countries that have U.S. troops on the ground, including countries that are part of Africom 1 (the U.S. entity that controls the military occupation), Afghanistan, Libya and Iraq have all been exposed to once in a thousand-year drought.
“Is it just a coincidence that all those countries were countries that the U.S. government is actively or passively trying to destabilize?” Wigington asks. “We had the leaders of some of those countries, like the leaders of Iran, on the floor of the United Nations (UN), stating that North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) weather modification programs were cutting off the precipitation to their country. So there’s a great many agendas being carried out …
If we get to the core of these programs, I think it’s inarguable that it’s about power and control, as we know all such programs are. Because to manipulate the weather is to literally be able to win a war without ever even firing a shot.”
According to Wigington, there appears to be a number of reasons for these geoengineering projects, none of which are benevolent or for the common good:
3. For communications enhancement purposes (as the atmosphere is being made more electrically conductive by these particles).
Weather Modification Then and Now
Weather modification actually has a rather long history, dating back to the mid 1940s. After World War II, weather modification definitely became an area of focus for the U.S. military complex. Since most technology increases exponentially, it would be reasonable to suspect we have far more sophisticated weather modification technologies at our disposal today than we did back then.
“We have historical documents … on our website, GeoengineeringWatch.org, which is a data repository … like a 750-page senate document that outlines the full scope and scale of these global programs (historically) … So we know these [programs] were fully deployed in the mid 1940s …
We have original issues of Popular Science magazine, Collier’s magazine… from the ‘50s that admitted … that this technology was fully functional. But as time has progressed and as the military and industrial complexes realized the public would not accept this type of manipulation, they’ve gone further and further underground. So we can only guess at the technology they have now.”
That said, patents dating back to 1950 offer clues to their capabilities to manipulate the weather. One NASA patent is for something called Chemical Ice Nucleation for Weather Modification. It describes a process by which rain storms can be chemically nucleated and converted into snow storms. According to Wigington, there’s also clear evidence that the U.S. and other governments are actively engaging in these kinds of weather wars.
“The Chinese government openly announced in 2009 that they were chemically nucleating snowstorms over Beijing,” he says. “They did a billion dollars’ worth of damage to Beijing, at which time they went underground … So at this point, can we really consider any weather natural when we have such massive scales of weather modification programs going on from multiple sources of power? The entire climate system is completely disrupted at this point.”
Unintended Consequences Are Par for the Course
So with what level of precision can weather actually be controlled? Like most science gone awry, are weather modification programs implemented and then end up having far more severe consequences than predicted?
“Very, very key question,” Wigington says. “The term “engineering,” in regard to what is happening to the climate system, is far too dignified a term. We need to use those terms because that’s what leads to the science, but your question is exactly on target. Now they’re trying to alter the term for addressing these programs to “climate intervention” because, ultimately, it’s simply a climate disruption, and there’s no precision to what they are doing at all.
This should be expected. It’s a form of weather whack-a-mole, if you will, where everything they do causes a host of reactions, negative effects, which they then try to react to. Again, not unlike taking [a] pharmaceutical that causes a certain set of side effects, which then need other pharmaceuticals to counteract [them].
It’s the same sort of scenario going on, but in this case, the consequences will be total [devastation] if we stay on the current trajectory. This is something I know many people don’t hear well. They don’t hear that the intervention with Earth’s life support systems will lead to consequences that are unimaginable …”
Why Public Disclosure Is Not Imminent
According to Wigington, the military and industrial complex is so heavily invested in these programs that any form of disclosure will be extremely difficult to obtain. Just imagine the ramifications if everyone suddenly knew they’ve been subjected to a lethal experiment without their knowledge or consent; that their bodies have been irreparably harmed by inhaling toxic heavy metals and chemicals dispersed in the air, including: Aluminum, Barium, Strontium, Manganese, Lead, Copper.
On top of that, there are severe environmental effects, such as protracted droughts and raging forest fires. In other areas, severe flooding is taking its toll. “I spoke to one of the insiders from these programs, from Oak Ridge National Laboratory … It was supposed to be confidential initially, but I have since published it. He stated on the record that they will try to hide these programs as long as possible because the liability is incomprehensible,” Wigington says.
The Climate Situation Is FAR More Severe Than You Imagine
There’s another aspect to it as well. If people really understood the totality of the situation — not just that the climate is being manipulated, but that as a result, the global climate systems have deteriorated to the point that the entire biosphere is in serious trouble; in short, that these programs may have created a (potential) runaway extinction event — the emotional impact might be too great to bear for many.
“Our situation is far more severe than most people have any understanding of,” he says. “Al Gore’s data in the film, “An Inconvenient Truth,” was not accurate, but in the opposite direction of what most people choose to believe, the climate scenario is far, far worse, and far more advanced than what people understand. Our situation is far more immediate and far more critical.
Climate engineering is making the situation worse, not better. So for all those reasons, they are trying to keep the population from panicking because of the severity and immediacy of the climate implosion, and keep the population in the dark because the climate intervention programs have helped to accelerate this process and toxified every single one of us in the process.
Every single human test subject we test is packed full of aluminum, barium — all the heavy metals we know are associated with these programs. It doesn’t matter where they live. And we know it’s coming down in the precipitation in unimaginable quantities — quantities enough to change soil pH values in the Pacific Northwest 10 to 12 times total alkaline — that’s an unimaginable amount of metal coming down in the rain.
If populations understood, truly, what’s been done to them, what’s been done to the planet … they’d be taking to the streets with pitchforks and torches all over the globe. The power structure knows that and they’ll try to hide these programs to the last possible moment, but I would argue that that moment is getting close.”
The Climate Unraveling Is a Non-Linear Equation
Part of the problem is we’ve been led to believe that climate changes are linear in nature and take centuries, if not millennia to unfold. But that’s not the case when you have an unnatural factor in the equation, such as climate engineering. “I can’t stress enough that the climate unraveling is a non-linear equation, more than what most people can imagine,” he says.
The fact of the matter is that geoengineering has been going on for some 70 years already. That’s a significant amount of human intervention into a system that, when left alone, has built-in checks and balances that ensure some level of global homeostasis. The mentality that has guided these programs has also magnified the risks. For example, during Project Starfish, the U.S. military detonated hydrogen bombs in the magnetosphere, just to see what would happen.
“This is the sort of mentality [they] have. They treat the atmosphere like a physics lab, [and] no one knows what they’re doing up there. There’s no regulation. They can do whatever they want. And they are. They have been,” Wigington says.
The particles dispersed in the air column are not just released and left alone. They’re further manipulated via radio frequency transmissions. The Alaskan installation known as HAARP 2 is but one facility involved. There are dozens of other large, ground-based facilities just like it around the globe. Smaller networks and NEXRAD radar stations located in urban areas around the world are also employed. All of these networks are used to manipulate the particles dispersed via “chemtrails” (geoengineering) in the atmosphere.
Aerosol Geoengineering Is Creating Uncontrolled Climate Havoc
These particulates can be likened to the chemical Corexit, a chemical so toxic it’s been banned by many countries. After the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Corexit was used to disperse the oil, even though the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) stated the chemical made the situation 52 times more toxic. The chemical was used because it helped HIDE the problem, even though it worsened the situation.
“It’s the same mentality with climate engineering. If we can go back to what I stated at the beginning of the show, the chemical ice nucleation — this helps to confuse the population as to the severity of the climate scenario. If we look at Boston in the winter of 2014 and 2015, you remember all of the snow that happened in Boston and how much media coverage there was?
What the media didn’t say was that, at the same time, we had 80-degree weather 14,000 feet up at the Sierras. They focused on where they’re engineering a cool-down, and create a lot of headlines that are confusing to the population, so the population doesn’t realize the severity of what’s unfolding in the world, including the Arctic.”
On Christmas Eve (2015), it was 40 degrees F. and raining at the North Pole. Meanwhile, the lower 48 states had 20 degrees below zero weather.
“The population would be astounded at that kind of contrast, but that’s what is being covered up,” he says. “Climate engineering is fueling the climate disintegration from countless fronts. That’s why I’ve focused on this issue so completely, because if the planet stops supporting life, whatever else we’re focused on won’t matter at that point.”
Geoengineering Programs Are Bound by Confidentiality With Lethal
Many dismiss the notion of geoengineering and weather wars based on refutations from people like pilots and military personnel. But what needs to be understood is that being part of these programs involve signing confidentiality agreements and, according to Wigington, “We have been told by one Air Force personnel, who is part of these programs, that confidentiality [agreement] contains provisions for lethal enforcement.”
He also notes that the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all of previous administrations combined. We also know that surveillance is just about everywhere, so in the case of geoengineering, there’s no lineup of people trying to blow the whistle.
Condensation Trails Versus Particulate Trails
There’s also debate on whether the lines criss-crossing the sky aren’t just regular condensation trails. A key difference between condensation trails and particulate trails is that condensation trails evaporate very quickly. They will not block 80 to 90 percent of solar uptake and create global dimming — an important scientific term used in geoengineering research. The persistent lines you see in the sky that very slowly disperse, creating a muddy, hazy “film” across the entire sky are NOT condensation trails. They are particulate trails.
Research shows 20 to 30 percent of the sun’s direct rays no longer reach the surface of the planet. They’re being deflected by the light-scattering particles in these aerosols, and that’s the specific stated purpose of solar radiation management. The stated goal by well-recognized geoengineers such as David Keith and Ken Caldeira is to put 20 million tons of aluminum nanoparticulates into the atmosphere annually — a staggering amount of toxic material.
Now, the smaller the particle, the more harmful it is for your body, as it can penetrate deeply into your system. The particulates being dispersed into the atmosphere are about 50 nanometers (nm) — so small that once you breathe them in, they cross through the lung lining into your bloodstream and through your blood-brain barrier into your brain. To learn how to identify the difference between condensation trails and particulate trails, take a look at Wigington’s tutorial above.
“It’s important to understand the mechanics and the physics of what’s going on in our skies. All commercial carriers and all military aircraft are fitted with high bypass turbo fan jet engines. It’s a jet-powered fan, by design nearly incapable of creating any condensation trail except under the most extreme circumstances because it’s designed for fuel efficiency. It’s unlike military fighter jets. It’s a completely different engine. So the animated tutorial [shows] this engine is not designed in a way that allows it to create a condensation trail, except under rare circumstances.
On top of that, we have film footage of military tankers spraying at altitude, turning on and off with nozzles visible. That’s the end of the argument. We have film of the crimes taking place up close. We have photographs of the nozzles mounted on the pylons directed into the engine exhaust stream to make this look like condensation …
A person also needs to activate their sense of reason. You can’t turn a condensation trail on and off. We see the on and off (spraying) frequently. We have film footage of it. When we add patents to what we have — we have about 160 patents that describe exactly what we’re seeing in the sky — all these dots connect. Every single one. [And we have the] same materials coming down the precipitation.”
Military jets are not the only ones carrying out these programs. Commercial carriers are also used, although commercial personnel, such as the pilots, are likely never informed of their role. Instead, automated and/or remote control systems appear to be used. This is called Project Cloverleaf, and Wigington has copies of letters in which Union Mechanics personnel were reprimanded or fired for asking why they were not permitted to work on the unknown aerosol systems installed on certain commercial carriers.
“It makes sense that this would be a form of plausible denial for those in the military and those behind these programs, because they can say, ‘Look, the commercial carriers are also emitting this trail on and off.’ But again, you can’t turn a condensation trail on and off. You don’t need nozzles unless you’re spraying something. We have photographs of the nozzles. We have a mountain of data to confirm that commercial carriers are in fact also being utilized …
We do have two commercial pilots and two military pilots that have spoken on the record about these programs — that these trails are absolutely not condensation. Period. We have a former Air Force industrial hygienist — their job is to check for environmental toxins — and she has spoken on the record … She’s seen the canisters being loaded, she’s tested for the materials … Her name is Kristen Meghan, and she was getting tremendous pressure from her former superiors about speaking out and she has since gone off the record.”
Dane financed and held a recent screening event for the film “Vaxxed” in Northern California, Wigington had a former CIA officer, Kevin Shipp, speak about what the government does to anyone who dares to break the confidentiality agreement. Their careers are ruined, their lives are ruined, and if they continue to speak out, the consequences are worse still. He knows this first hand, and has detailed his travails in the book, “From the Company of Shadows.” He and his family were physically harmed by government goons as a repercussion for breaking his oath of confidentiality. “So again, for those who think that people would line up to speak out about this issue, that’s just simply not a reality,” Wigington says.
Moreover: “We have top U.S. military brass stating, on the record in multiple reports, multiple articles, that the disintegrating climate is the greatest national security threat of all, by far. I would ask you to consider this: do we really think that they would ask our permission to do this if they perceive this to be the greatest national security threat of all? … Why would we think they would ask our permission to engage in these programs? That’s a very naive notion,” he says.
Thousands of Airliners Dump Particulates Into the Air Each Day
How many air carriers are dispersing nanoparticulates? Based on the stated goal, which is to disperse 20 million tons of aluminum nanoparticulates into the atmosphere each year to deflect incoming thermal energy, you’d need as many as 700 military tankers per day, dispersing 60 to 70 tons per flight. To break that down into smaller payloads suitable for a commercial airline carrier, you’re looking at thousands of flight daily.
California Aquatic and Terrestrial Insect Life Has Declined 90 Percent in Last Decade
GeoengineeringWatch.org lists a number of lab tests that have been performed on rain water, air sample and more, and their results. You can find them under the Tests section. They now also have former government scientists, former forest service scientists and former fish and game scientists that have joined their legal efforts to put an end to geoengineering. Wigington’s group has already filed legal papers in Canada and are working on filing suit in the U.S. You can learn more about their legal action on the website.
“In regard to the effect in the environment, in Northern California alone … what we’ve seen in the last decade … is a 90 percent decline in aquatic and terrestrial insect life. Ninety percent. A virtual crash. There’s so much aluminum coming down the precipitation, affecting the soil pH … and — this is very important — the UV radiation level is off the charts, and that we can link directly to climate engineering …
We’re seeing UVB levels about 1,000 percent higher than we’re being told. It’s burning the bark off of trees. It’s killing plankton. It’s affecting insect life … [It increases UVB radiation] because it shreds the natural protection for the planet. When you put a particle in the atmosphere, it doesn’t matter whether it’s from a back of a jet or a volcano; it causes a chemical reaction in the atmosphere that destroys ozone. Period. So the more of these particles you put in the atmosphere, the more rapid the ozone destruction is,” Wigington explains.
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are typically blamed for the destruction of the ozone layer, but according to Wigington’s findings, CFCs cause a fraction of the damage compared to the damage done by climate engineering programs, given the massive scale of these programs.
The Earth Is in Dire Straits
According to Wigington’s research, global plankton populations are down by 50 to 60 percent. Plankton supplies the majority of oxygen on the planet, followed by boreal forests. The rapid elimination of these critical suppliers of oxygen pose a massive danger to all life on Earth.
“Mathematically speaking, climate engineering has stopped the planet from being able to respond to the damage done (anthropogenic). It’s destroying the planet’s natural life support systems … I would argue that, short of nuclear cataclysm, the greatest and most immediate threat we face right now is climate engineering and all the effects that come with it …
We have species extinction rates today that are nearing 15,000 times the background rate. We’re nearing 300 species a day of plant, animal and insect going extinct. You can verify those statistics. That’s 1.5 million percent of background rates, there is nothing normal about that. There are countless anthropogenic causes, I’m not denying that. The human race has been very poor stewards of the planet. But mathematically speaking, we can say that the greatest assault we’ve faced at this moment in time, short of nuclear cataclysm, is climate engineering. Our situation is beyond dire right now.”
How You Can Help
GeoengineeringWatch.org is a terrific and informative website where you can independently validate the things Wigington has brought forth in this interview. It’s a large repository of research papers, government documents, articles and videos related to geoengineering. Statements in articles on the site are also backed up with hyperlinks to the original data, allowing you to dig deep.
“As far as what you can do, and that’s the most important question of all, we must reach a critical massive awareness,” he says. “I would argue this: If we can reach that critical mass [in] awareness, we’ll have academicians pouring from every corner. If they have enough public cover, [they will] come out of the shadows and admit that these programs are going on because they certainly absolutely know.
By the way, we have an illegal federal gag order right now on all national weather service and all National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employees, the weathermen. An illegal federal gag order. Common sense should state that if there wasn’t something very big they’re hiding; they would not put this gag order onto the weathermen — on top of the fact that the government scientists have no first amendment protection to begin with.
So if your listeners truly want to help, all they have to do from their own home computer is simply share credible data with others … I’ve spoken to a NOAA scientist myself, face to face, who told me off the record ‘We all know this is going on. We don’t know what to do. We don’t have first amendment protection’…
I’ve been in high-level Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) locked-door meetings arranged by congressional rep. I was told by five EPA officials in this meeting that the system is rigged, ‘We’re told what to test for and what not to test for.’ I mean, this is truly an issue of unimaginable magnitude and gravity. We need the population to help us bring it to the light of day.”
CIA Whistleblower Speaks Out About Climate Engineering, Vaccination Dangers, 911, And The Government’s Persecution Of Truth-Tellers
Kevin Shipp was a decorated CIA officer who refused to look the other way in regard to government criminality and cover-up. At a recent critical public awareness event in Northern California organized by GeoengineeringWatch.org, Mr. Shipp gave an extremely informative and compelling presentation on numerous horrific ongoing government crimes. The subjects Kevin Shipp addressed included climate engineering, the 911 false flag inside job, vaccination dangers/cover-up, and the governments total persecution of anyone who dares to tell the truth about rampant government tyranny. Mr. Shipp's powerful presentation is below.
The paradigm we have all known has been built on deception and the dark agendas of the global power structure. The courage Kevin Shipp has shown by doing his best to expose government criminality and tyranny (detailed in Kevin's book "In The company Of Shadows) serves as a stellar example to all of us. We desperately need other individuals in government agencies and the US military to follow Kevin's lead . If we have any chance of stopping the completely out of control criminal cabal that currently runs our country and much of the world, we must all make our voices heard, we must all join the battle for the greater good.
Climate engineering is an undeniable reality as recent NASA satellite photos prove. Hurricane Matthew was a well timed engineered distraction that provided a great deal of cover for the now completely out of control power structure that is pushing us perilously close to a nuclear WWlll. Locations off of the US mainland coast (such as Haiti where the decimation suited the agenda of those in power) were slaughtered, while Matthew was kept from making catastrophic damage on US shores. Overhyped Matthew media coverage successfully eclipsed other headlines of imploding global ecosystems, and more lines in the sand being drawn from the global powers that have had enough of the US/NATO aggression. The pharmaceutical industrial complex has decided there is not enough aluminum in the existing Gardasil vaccination so they have decided to double the amount of aluminum in this already lethal injection. The fossil fuel industry has been radically underreporting the amount of methane they are spilling into the atmosphere, but the fountains of methane that are now blowing out in the Arctic completely overshadow it all. The Pentagon is pumping hundreds of millions into fake Al-Qaeda terrorist videos, and the US population is for the most part still asleep at the wheel. The human race remains on a trajectory toward near term extinction. The October 8th installment of Global Alert News is below.
Hurricane Matthew is about to decimate specific populations that are already struggling to survive. Is this storm being manipulated by the weather/climate modification programs? Though countless anthropogenic factors have contributed to the rapid warming of our planet, there is no question that global climate engineering/weather warfare is a reality and making an already horrific climate scenario far worse. What agendas might the power structure be carrying out by manipulating and/or exacerbating climate chaos over specific regions and during critical windows of time? Is mass distraction from US/NATO fueled Middle East and European mahem one of the objectives being provided by the climate engineers and hurricane "Matthew"? All available data indecates the geoengineers have been actively suppressing cyclones in the Atlantic basin for at least a decade. Why has "Matthew" been at minumum allowed to strengthen? Was the unexpected 90 degree northward turn of this storm a natural occurance? Or was this course alteration the result of geoengineering, ionosphere heaters, and atmospheric aerosol spraying? What other objectives might also be in the balance? There has been an over 11 year hurricane drought in the US regarding major hurricane landfalls and that drought persists. Though many sources tried to claim that Hurricane "Hermine" ended the anomalous hurricane drought for the US, this is not true, as "Hermine" was barely a category 1 hurricane, and even then only for an extremely short period just prior to landfall. "Hermine" DID NOT end the major hurricane landfall drought in the US. How can the US be spared the record major hurricane impacts that are pounding so many locations in other parts of the world? Because the largest military in the world (the US military) is at the head of massive climate intervention programs that are nothing short of weather warfare. Though some might claim that cyclone suppression for the us (that, again, has gone on for over 11 years) is beneficial (and therefore should be embraced), this very suppression contributes to even more overall heat buildup in the climate system and thus eventually even more hurricanes of even greater strength. This must also be considered, ALL forms of climate engineering involve the use of highly toxic materials that quickly descend through the breathable air column and are, therefore, inhaled and absorbed by all life forms.
Geoengineering/solar radiation management programs are highly visible in skies all over the world. Photo credit: Dirk Poole
Again, about hurricane "Matthew", why is it being allowed to strengthen (or possibly even being aumented by the weather makers) when the climate engineers have patented hurricane suppression technology to suppress this storm? There are likely many agendas being carried out with "Matthew"(including providing a timely distraction from the US push toward WWlll), but as already stated, cyclones provide cooling and ocean mixing for our rapidly warming planet. So long as the weather makers can steer this highly destructive cyclone over regions and populations that are not of interest or concern to the US military powers (or over regions where the destruction might even provide opportunities for US military occupations to be carried out under the pretext of "humanitarian aid"), then the cyclones are allowed to spin up and strengthen. The "moisture pump" effect of this cyclone as it is steered northward (while possibly being prevented from making a landfall on the US east coast and thus the military ports based there) will also provide some temporary cooling for the record warm oceans and for the East Coast. But at what cost does the hurricane manipulatioin come in regard to the planet as a whole? As Matthew approaches the US, the bombardment of aerosol spraying occurring over the storm will likely increase dramatically. The climate engineers will likely try to weaken the storm to create the largest expanse of aerosolized sun blocking cloud canopy possible (SRM operations), and, again, possibly to keep the storm from actually making landfall on the US east coast. This being said, in the end, we can't know the full agenda of those behind the levers of power and thus we cannot say with certainty how they will attempt to manipulate this storm in the coming days.
Hurricane Matthew has gone through very anomalous phases where it almost appears to be a twin cyclone on radar images as the core was divided.
"Matthew" has even transitioned through phases where there were actually 3 major zones of convection.
The forecast map above shows the original projected path of Hurricane Matthew.
Hurricane Matthew's new projected path as of 10/3/16, a near 90 degree northerly turn from the original projected path.
The photo above was taken on 10-2-16 near the Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince (photo: AFP)
Haiti is a country of immense struggle and crisis, much of it fueled and excacerbated by outside influences. The Haitian people already have good reason to feel angst and anger toward western powers, how much more anger would they feel if they knew about the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare operations? How many countries around the globe have had to endure engineered climate catastrophes which then led to military occupation under the pretext of "humanitarian aid"? When countries do not cooperate with the agenda of the western power structure, are they then made the victims of weather warfare?
The planet's climate system is aggressively being used as a weapon of war, conquest, and control. As power structure becomes more desperate (due to unfolding global scenarios), they will likely become rapidly more aggressive with weather warfare operations. The global geoengineering/weather warfare assault is the greatest and most immediate threat to life on Earth short of nuclear cataclysm. All are needed to help with the most critical battle to expose and halt the ongoing climate engineering insanity, make your voice heard.
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.
Few yet comprehend the degree to which those in power have been engaged in aggressively and intentioinally degrading the health and cognitive function of populations. Few yet comprehend the severity of damage that has already been inflicted on the planet's life support systems. The desperation of the power structure is rapidly reaching new levels of blatancy as they run out of options. Their attempt to hide all that is unfolding from the population is finally beginning to fail. How will the public respond to the medical community once they fully realize the extent to which so many in the medical field have profited by aggressively pushing undeniably dangerous vaccinations. The cancer that currently controls the world is completely out of control. If we are to have any chance of fully exposing and halting it in time to salvage any semblance of our planet's life support systems (and our health), we must all take a stand together. The latest issue of Global Alert News is below.
The clock continues to tick toward midnight, time is not on our side. Make your voice heard in the fight for the greater good while there is still time to make a difference.
The true dangers posed by vaccinations are finally coming to light. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is a veteran in the battle to raise awareness of the threats posed to human health by the ongoing vaccination assault. At a recent major public awareness event in Northern California (organized/sponsored by GeoengineeringWatch.org), Dr. Tenpenny gave a powerful and extremely informative live presentation to directly address the vaccination threat to our health. I wish to express my most sincere gratitude to Dr. Tenpenny for her tireless work toward the greater good.
The stakes are raising by the day as the Earth's climate and life support systems continue to unravel. The US military has long since acknowledged that the disintegrating climate system is the greatest national security threat of all. What has never been admitted to by our government, the military, mainstream media, and legions of academicians (that are either paid off or threatened into silence), is the ongoing global climate engineering assault. Geoengineering/solar radiation management programs are nothing short of weather and biological warfare (due to the highly toxic fallout from the climate engineering programs). The recent "Presidential Memorandum" from President Obama is revealing. Not just because of what it covers, but because of the glaring omission of the climate engineering issue which is only eluded to in the document (excerpts below).
Presidential Memorandum — Climate Change and National Security
September 21, 2016
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT: Climate Change and National Security
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following:
Section 1. Purpose. This memorandum establishes a framework and directs Federal departments and agencies (agencies) to perform certain functions to ensure that climate change-related impacts are fully considered in the development of national security doctrine, policies, and plans.
The US military has long since stated its objective to "Own The Weather".
Sec. 2. Background. Climate change poses a significant and growing threat to national security, both at home and abroad. Climate change and its associated impacts affect economic prosperity, public health and safety, and international stability. Extended drought, more frequent and severe weather events, heat waves, warming and acidifying ocean waters, catastrophic wildfires, and rising sea levels all have compounding effects on people's health and well-being. Flooding and water scarcity can negatively affect food and energy production. Energy infrastructure, essential for supporting other key sectors, is already vulnerable to extreme weather and may be further compromised. Impacts of a changing climate can create conditions that promote pest outbreaks and the spread of invasive species as well as plant, animal, and human disease, including emerging infectious disease, and these can further undermine economic growth and livelihoods. Impacts can also disrupt transportation service, cutting off vulnerable communities from relief immediately after events and reducing economic output. These conditions, in turn, can stress some countries' ability to provide the conditions necessary for human security. All of these effects can lead to population migration within and across international borders, spur crises, and amplify or accelerate conflict in countries or regions already facing instability and fragility.
Climate change and associated impacts on U.S. military and other national security-related missions and operations could adversely affect readiness, negatively affect military facilities and training, increase demands for Federal support to non-federal civil authorities, and increase response requirements to support international stability and humanitarian assistance needs.
The top US military leaders have stated again and again that the disintegrating climate system is the greatest national security threat of all.
(a) The Climate and National Security Working Group. The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, or their designees, will chair an interagency working group (Working Group) to coordinate the development of a strategic approach to identify, assess, and share information on current and projected climate-related impacts on national security interests and to inform the development of national security doctrine, policies, and plans.
US weather/climate modification programs are a historically verifiable fact.
Historical documents (a massive 750 page US Senate document is one) verify that global weather modification/climate engineering programs have been going on for some 70 years.
(b) Representation. The Working Group shall include representatives, at the Assistant Secretary or equivalent level, or their designees, from:
(i) the Department of State;
(ii) the Department of the Treasury;
(iii) the Department of Defense;
(iv) the Department of Justice;
(v) the Department of the Interior;
(vi) the Department of Agriculture;
(vii) the Department of Commerce;
(viii) the Department of Health and Human Services;
(ix) the Department of Transportation;
(x) the Department of Energy;
(xi) the Department of Homeland Security;
(xii) the United States Agency for International Development;
(xiii) the Environmental Protection Agency;
(xiv) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
(xv) the Office of the Director of National Intelligence;
(xvi) the U.S. Mission to the United Nations;
(xvii) the Office of Management and Budget;
(xviii) the Council on Environmental Quality;
(xix) the Millennium Challenge Corporation; and
(xx) any other agencies or offices as designated by the Co-Chairs.
(c) Functions. The Working Group, in close collaboration with the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), shall:
(i) identify the U.S. national security priorities that are within the scope of the Working Group's mission;
(ii) develop recommendations for requirements for climate and social science data and intelligence analyses, as appropriate, that support national security interests;
(iii) catalog climate science data, intelligence analyses, and other products and programs that support or should be considered in the development of national security doctrine, policy, and plans. This catalogue shall include climate and social science data repositories and analytical platforms; climate modeling, simulation, and projection capabilities; and information-sharing tools and resources supporting climate risk analyses and assessments, such as the Climate Data Initiative, the Climate Resilience Toolkit, the Global Change Information System, and the National Climate Assessment;
The very same governmental agencies that are named in this new "Obama Climate Change Memorandum" have already been involved in the weather modification/climate engineering arena for over a half century as historical presidential reports prove.
(x) in coordination with the NSTC, recommend research guidelines concerning the Federal Government's ability to detect climate intervention activities;
The US government (and other major powers around the globe) have been actively and aggressively engaged in a toxic tug of war with the Earth's climate system since the end of WWll.
(xiv) have classified and unclassified capabilities, as required and appropriate, to consolidate and make available climate change-related impact information, intelligence analyses, and assessments for access and use by Working Group member agencies;
Even weather "forecasting" agencies like The Weather Channel are owned by corporate entities that are completely connected to the power structure. To help silence government employees in organizations like The National Weather Service and NOAA, illegal federal gag orders have been used.
(xvii) coordinate on the development of quantitative models, predictive mapping products, and forecasts to anticipate the various pathways through which climate change may affect public health as an issue of national security.
Though the government is admitting to the impacts of climate change on public health, there is, of course, no mention of the global climate engineering assault and the catastrophic impact to public health being caused by geoengineering programs.
(b) identify climate change-related risks to agency missions, and risks that may be caused by agency policies, programs, and actions…
(g) identify climate change-related impacts on global water and food security and nutrition and the resulting impacts on national security, and recommend actions to mitigate these impacts;
Though anthropogenic climate change is undeniable and dire, climate engineering is the single greatest causal factor in regard to the record droughts occurring all over the globe.
f) "Global health security" refers to activities required, both proactive and reactive, to minimize vulnerability to acute public health events that endanger the collective health of populations living across geographical regions and international boundaries and includes the efforts of the Global Health Security Agenda to establish capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to disease threats, whether naturally occurring, deliberate, or accidental.
Geoengineering is also biological warfare, all available data makes this fact undisputable.
(d) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
The final paragarph in Obama's "memorandum" is essentially a statement of full immunity for the US government. The power structure is increasingly desperate and maneuvering as rapidly as they can. The time we have remaining to fully expose the criminal cabal that has taken over our government (and our weather) is running out. The task of sharing credible information with the still uninformed belongs to all of us, make your voice heard in the critical battle to sound the alarm.
The United States government and the military it controls is in the business of destabilizing and toppling any nation that gets in the way of its hegemonic agenda. Syria was thrust into chaos because its democratically elected leader refused to allow a US backed pipeline to be constructed across his country. There are dozens of other such examples from the last few decades alone. The desperation of the western power structure continues to manifest as it pushes the world ever closer to WWlll. The US government's support of the ISIS terrorists is becoming impossible to hide or deny. The American population will very soon be forced to face the fact that they are not only expendable to those at the top of their own government, but are actually a rapidly increasing liability for the power elite. The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.
If we have any chance of waking the masses and changing course in time, all of us are needed to join the critical effort to sound the alarm.
Sacrificing All For The Fight To Expose And Halt Climate Engineering, The Moving Testimony Of A Now Former Educator
The battle to expose and halt the ongoing climate engineering insanity has been incredibly arduous for all that have truly committed themselves to this monumental and dire task. Some have made immense sacrifices in this fight, their testimonies should be an inspiration to us all. A former elementary school teacher, Laura Kozicki, is a stellar example of an individual's total dedication to the greater good. Laura's story, in her own words, is below. The recent newspaper ad she paid for with her own hard earned funds is posted after Laura's testimony.
When I first learned about geoengineering in 2011 after watching a program about geoengineering, I had already felt distrustful of our government. A close relative of mine had been diagnosed with autism and ADHD about 5 years earlier. I’d learned about the thimerosol in childrens' vaccinations and mercury in dental fillings. And sure enough, genetic testing showed that her body probably wouldn’t be making sufficient amounts of glutathione. Glutathione is abundant naturally in the body and is used by the body to eliminate toxins, including metals. Intravenous glutathione helped remove many of the toxins her body wasn’t able to get rid of on its own. The roughly $30,000 spent out of pocket on alternative methods for healing could have sent her to college this fall.
From learning about the health risks of vaccines, I concluded that the government had been reckless and irresponsible with people’s health and well-being. It hadn’t occurred to me at the time when I was learning all this information about vaccines, toxicity, damage to the digestive tract, and autism that some individuals or organizations might have been intentionally causing harm.
When I came to understand what geoengineering is and how it clearly will end life on this planet if it’s not stopped, then I realized that there actually may be an intent to cause harm. The quick read "Addicted to War: Why the U.S. Can’t Kick Militarism" by Joel Andreas was another dot connector for me.
After watching the episode about geoengineering, I asked aloud, Why would they do a thing like this? The words ‘Book of Revelation’ flashed into my mind. I went through a period of depression where I lost my appetite and felt hopeless and helpless. After about a month I realized that regardless of how I feel about the situation, I have a responsibility in trying to warn others about this. I began trying to talk with colleagues at the elementary school where I was teaching about geoengineering. Some colleagues were a little interested, but some were frightened, and others didn’t want to hear about it. I had felt a responsibility, and still feel a responsibility in at least trying to offer the information to people. How would I feel about myself years down the road if I hadn’t tried to warn them? When it comes right down to it, all of our lives depend on alerting each other so that together humanity can put an end to geoengineering. It’s like if we see someone crossing a street and they’re not aware that they’re about to be hit by a speeding semi, wouldn’t it be the right thing to do to warn them? If we don’t let each other know about geoengineering, it’s going to kill us all.
I was warned from the school district administration after I started trying to talk to co-workers about this topic. I don’t know if there is a way that an employer would see it as being appropriate for an employee to try to talk to co-workers on the job about geoengineering, the appearance of the sky, or any other politically sensitive topic. Maybe it comes down to “Don’t try to warn your co-workers if there’s something you see as a danger” and “Stay within the boundaries if you want to keep your job”.
Near the end of April this year, I was notified that my teaching contract wouldn’t be renewed. To be fair to the district in the decision they had made, I cannot state for certain what their reasons were.
I had stopped reciting the Pledge of Allegiance some years earlier, but my second grade students must have thought that they were required or at least expected to do so. It seems like if kids are asked to recite an oath that isn’t required of them by law, they should at least be told that it’s optional, but I don’t think anybody ever did tell them.
I’ll probably always wonder if my talking about geoengineering to colleagues was part of the decision not to renew my teaching contract. After the shock of losing my job and the immediate worries about maybe having to sell the house eventually to make ends meet (I had seen that this may be coming for a while and had been saving money), I began to realize that losing my teaching job has actually been a blessing and an opportunity.
For the past 5 years or so I had tried to let others know about the dangers of geoengineering, but whatever I did, like airing a geoengineering documentary film on the Milwaukee area public access TV station, I did so wondering whether someone from my school district would see it with my name as the volunteer who prepared the program to be aired, and if there would be repercussions if someone connected to my job would see that I was responsible for a film about geoengineering going on public access TV. There was always the tug of war between “do the right thing” and “paycheck and pension”. I finally told God a few years ago that if he wanted me to speak openly and boldly then he should remove me from my teaching job so that I could stop worrying about trying to keep it.
After my teaching contract ended permanently this June, I found a part time job working at a gas station. It’s helping me make ends meet and not have to dip into savings as much. The food pantry has been a great help, too. I know that by publically speaking out and attaching my name to it, I could possibly lose this job, too, because most employers don’t want employees that cause them problems or embarrassment. So there might always be some knots in my stomach about finances if I keep talking about this issue. But I couldn’t live with myself if I would just keep quiet about it. When my pension comes in about 3 years (if pensions aren’t a thing of the past by then) it may not be enough to make ends meet, because I left teaching early.
Everybody has their own best ways of communicating. For me, talking to people I don’t know about geoengineering is difficult because I’m a shy person and I do not yet feel confident about communicating the scientific details of the issue. For other people, that might be a good approach. I’ve realized that for me putting information out into the public to point people to a good informational resource is a better way of communicating on this topic, so that’s the direction I’ll take. I feel grateful for media sources that are willing to print information about this and other controversial topics of importance.
Corinthians 9:24 (CEV)
“You know that many runners enter a race, and only one of them wins the prize. So run to win!…”
What a tragedy for us all if geoengineering should win this race. If we win the race against geoengineering together, the prize will be the hope for a healthier Earth and a future for humanity along with the many living organisms that share this planet we all call home.
Click image to enlarge
Newspaper ads, like the one above from Laura Kozicki, expose the general population to the climate intervention issue and are extremely helpful in the overall effort to reach a critical mass of awareness.
Various versions of GeoengineeringWatch billboards have been put up around the country and Canada.
Words of wisdom from JFK which were printed in Laura's newspaper ad.
I wish to convey my deepest respect and regard for Laura and for every courageous individual who is doing everything they can to sound the alarm given their individual circumstances. This is a battle we can only win by working together, we must all make our voices heard.
Do we have a country with a "government"? Or do we have a "government" with a country? The latter is the case, as our government has clearly long since become nothing more than an unimaginably massive criminal cabal. Our government is a tool of enforcement for those who print the money, the central bankers. The CIA is one of the mechanisms of enforcement used by the tyrants behind the curtain who are actually in control. As a former decorated CIA officer, Kevin Shipp has shown incredible courage and honor by speaking out against the expanding and metastasizing tyranny within the halls of government. Those within agencies like the CIA who dare to tell the truth face the decimation of their careers and their lives. In the 10 minute video interview below Kevin tells the story of what he endured for simply attempting to do his job honorably.
How can we support extremely courageous whistleblowers like Kevin Shipp? By each and every one of us doing our part to help sound the alarm. By sharing credible data with family, friends and others. Everything is at stake, make your voice heard.
The day is rapidly coming when countless members of our society will be forced to face the fact that they have been living in a delusional reality. So many will soon be forced to face the fact that they, themselves, have been a part of the tyranny, whether actively or passively, by fully supporting the system that has painted us into this dark corner. Those who have bought into and used the "conspiracy theory" programmed knee jerk response to any individual that had the courage to try and share unpleasant truths with them, are a massive part of the problem. The constant utilization of the "conspiracy theory" term in our society shows cowardice and a true lack of objective reasoning. Real and objective investigation of dire global issues takes courage and fortitude. As countless crimes of the power structure begin to become impossible to hide, they are preparing to tighten their noose of total control. Will the masses wake in time? The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.
Being an active part of the solution, or of the peaceful resistance, is a choice, make your voice heard while you can.
The Climate engineers are increasingly desperate to hide the accelerating planetary meltdown with short term chemically nucleated cool-downs. Engineered cool-downs have been a major component of the climate engineering assault for many decades. The chemical cool-downs create the headlines the power structure needs to continue the population's confusion and division in regard to the true state of the climate. Yellowstone National Park is the latest example of chemically ice nucleated deception.
The photo above was taken in Yellowstone National Park on Monday, September 12, 2016. Photo credit: Devon Hannan
The Yellowstone event is not unique, a chemically nucleated "snowstorm" in South Dakota that occurred on October 4th of 2013 killed up to 100,000 cattle. This event occured while it was 85 degrees and raining in Chicago and 89 degrees with rain in Kansas City.Other anamolous cool-down chemically nucleated events in South America may have been responsible for the death of up to 200,000 alpacas.
On Monday, September 12th, 2016 (the same day that the snowstorm photo above was taken), the south entrance to Yellowstone park was closed due to an ongoing out of control wildfire (as shown in the photo below).
Again, this wildfire was raging on the same day (and at the same time), that other parts of Yellowstone Park were experiencing a summer snowstorm.
Liquid precipitation can be chemically converted to frozen precipitation under a variety of conditions when there is enough moisture present and a large enough geoengineering operation deployed. The Chinese openly announced the fact that they were chemically nucleating snowstorms until they did a billion dollars worth of damage to Beijing.
Radar map multi-hour loops can be revealing in regard to chemical ice nucleation process. Migrating bands of precipitation can often be seen "flashing out" to frozen precipitation with no elevation change on the topography below the storm/precipitation.
Do US temperature maps for September 12, 2016, indicate conditions are present that would facilitate such a summer snowstorm? NO.
The map above is for Monday, September 12, 2016, the same day as the snowstorm in Yellowstone.
Above normal temperatures are, again, returning to the Yellowstone region and are predicted to peak by Sunday, September 18th, 2016.
The very rapid rebound of high temperatures is a glaring red flag as to the engineered nature of the Yellowstone "summer snowstorm". Weather "whiplash" is becoming the norm.
As previously mentioned, the engineered cool-downs are a means of confusing and dividing the population as to the true state of the global climate. Though climate engineering can create the temporary toxic cool-downs, they come at the cost of an even worse overall warming. How warm is our planet? This is not about Al Gore and carbon credit scams, it is about reality. July 2016 was the 15th consecutive month of all time record high temperature months. August, 2016, just broke the record again. Records are being shattered in spite of wide spread UNDER REPORTING of official high temperatures.
The animation above clearly shows the trend of rapidly rising temperatures on planet Earth. Geoengineering, and its endless list of negative consequences, is making an already dire global climate scenario worse overall, not better.
Does the long term forecast call for "cooler than normal" temperatures for the US (including Alaska)? Again, the answer is NO.
The rapidly increasing orange and red zones (all reflecting above normal and far above normal temperatures) on US "departure from normal temperature" forecast maps should be extremely alarming to all of us.
Are global land and temperatures cooling? NO
The planet may well be in a runaway greenhouse event already with climate engineering helping to fuel the overall fire.
The biosphere was in a cooling phase until the start of the industrial revolution. The two level periods of temperatures in the historical graph below were due to the climate forcing effect of aerosols loading/saturation of the atmosphere.
The toxic tug of war between increasing greenhouse gases and atmospheric aerosols (with geoengineering adding to the aerosol loading since the mid 1940s) is wreaking havoc on the climate system.
On a longer timescale, the impact of anthropogenic activity (which includes geoengineering) can clearly be seen.
The long term cooling trend on the planet turned to an abrupt climate shift toward extremely rapid heating.
On an even longer scale, the total disruption of Earth's normal and natural cyclical pattern is shockingly visible
On a time scale of this duration, the heating up of our planet appears as a straight up vertical trajectory at the far right of the graph.
Arctic sea ice is one of the most measurable and visible harbingers of our rapidly changing planet. Headlines of Arctic ice expansion are patently false as are headlines of global glacier expansion. Though Arctic sea ice is imploding, the use of chemical ice nucleation is being heavily utilized in the desperate attempt to keep the headline from full public veiw for as long as possible. The Greenland ice sheet is also rapidly melting. To deny the unfoding planetary meltdown is simply to toe the line for big oil and the geoengineers, public ignorance and denial of the front line reality is what they want. The climate engineers have used climate modification as a weapon of war, nothing less. In their attempt to manipulate the planet's life support systems for their own agendas, the overall warming has been accelerated due to the endless list of climate engineering consequences. The 30 second video below illistrates the melt rate of Arctic sea ice.
From ozone layer destruction, to devastating drought, to fueling wildfires, geoengineering/weather warfare programs are wreaking havoc around the globe. Though the US military has just admitted on the record (again) that the disintagrating climate is a massive national security risk, what they won't admit to is that they (and the global geoengineering programs they are a part of) are a huge factor further forcing the disintagration to begin with. Climate engineering is nothing short of a covert weapon to control populations at the expense of the entire web of life. If we are to salvage what is left of the planet's life support systems, the climate engineering insanity must be exposed and halted. Help us in this most critical battle, make your voice heard.
The blatant crimes of the power elite are slowly but surely being pushed out into the light of day. The climate engineering assault, the truth about the 911 atrocities, and the vaccinations that are verifiably harmful, are three of the most critical issues that have fueled the darkening horizon. In spite of the collapsing conditions in society and the biosphere, a massive cruise ship (nearly 1000 feet long and 13 stories high) has just completed an unprecedented voyage through the now melted ice of the Northwest Passage. Tickets for this cruise of the wealthy through the imploding Arctic were priced from $22,000 to $120,000. The Arctic ice is not all that is melting, the chemically nucleated "ice wall" that was constructed to contain the radioactive rivers flowing under Fukushima is also crumbling. A veil of methane is enveloping the planet, the climate engineers continue to fuel the overall planetary meltdown. Is there yet time to free the planet from the onslaught? In the meantime the CDC is attempting to gain the power to force vaccinate the population and the Zika organophosphate spraying continues. The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.
All of us must work together to expose those who are participating in the insanity whether actively or passively. All of us must work together to awaken those that are still unaware of what is unfolding.
Connecting with the entire Vaxxed team at the recent Northern California public awareness event was truly an honor. VAXXED director Polly Tommey has completely committed herself to the critical fight against the vaccination lies and deception that has been systematically programmed into the US population. Polly's testimony of her own path of awakening is very powerful and compelling, she has given the last 19 years of her life toward the effort of waking the masses to the full truth about vaccinations. My most sincere gratitude to Polly for her tireless dedication toward the greater good, the three minute video below provides a glimpse of her courage and compassion.
With each passing day, with each passing week and month, the overturning of our former reality is unfolding. As countless individuals in our society try desperately to cling to the fading paradigm they have known, their propensity toward total denial is reaching ever more astounding levels. Others, in agencies and the media, are displaying unimaginable levels of tyranny and public betrayal as they grasp for what they falsely perceive as security by conforming to the herd mentality. In addition to the 24/7 climate engineering toxic aerosol assault, citizens in the US and elsewhere are now being sprayed with incredibly toxic organophosphates under the guise of mosquito abatement. The economic implosion continues to move in lockstep with the unfolding biosphere collapse, even Walmart is letting 7000 employees go. The US has become a war state that is simply a tool of the military industrial complex, but is this really anything new? How close is global conflict? How much longer can the biosphere function under the all out assault from countless directions? When will the apathy and denial of first world societies finally shatter? The latest addition of Global Alert News is below.
Each of us is responsible for ourselves, for our own conduct, for what we do (or don't do) toward the greater good. We must stand together with unyielding resolve to help with the most critical effort of all, to wake the sleeping masses. Make your voice heard, make every day count.
Andrew Wakefield is truly a stellar example of human courage and compassion. How many have truly stopped to consider the monumental sacrifices Dr. Wakefield has made in the attempt to protect our children? How many even know of (or have contemplated) the price Dr. Wakefield has paid with the sole motive of doing what was right? I first had the incredible honor of meeting Andrew at the 2015 Cal Jam event in L.A. where we were both speakers. The more I learned about the depth of Dr. Wakefield's dedication, sincerity, and humility, the more profoundly I have been impressed by him, by who he is, and what he stands for. In this 15 minute candid discussion with Dr. Wakefield, his complete dedication to the greater good is powerfully evident and inarguable.
The recent rash of mainstream media propaganda pushback against the rapidly rising global climate engineering awareness is a glaring red flag which proves that we are indeed gaining ground in this all important battle. Those who work for the mainstream media organizations of mass deception should at this point be considered as accessories to the geoengineering/weather warfare crimes of omnicide when they willingly participate in the cover-up of these crimes. "Scientists" like Dr. David Keith, and Dr. Ken Caldeira have been (and still are) leading the effort to deceive the public with yet another major disinformation pushback from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. These two individuals should not only be considered accessories to the criminal climate engineering cover-up, but should also be considered primary instigators of this cover-up.
Dr. Caldeira and Dr. Keith were both contributors to a recent disinformation "study" designed to deceive the population and intimidate others in academia from speaking out about the climate engineering crimes. Caldeira's employer, Carnegie "Science", was the supporting institution for this "study" (orchestrated survey). The Carnegie group has long since admitted on the record that geoengineering would not only "make the skies whiter", but it would actually "turn them white". So how is it that this power structure institution, Carnegie "Science", (with defense industry contracts) now tries to completely marginalize the very issue they have issued reports about? They deny the very reality of the solar radiation management effect in our skies which mountains of data prove is an ongoing reality. The CBC Canadian corporate news empire has added their voice to the cover-up effort, again with Dr. Keith at the helm of the deception. Once the Canadian billboard in the photo below came to Dr. Keith's attention (the billboard's link leads directly to GeoengineeringWatch.org), Keith apparently made sure there would be a corporate media pushback to blatantly lie about the billboard's meaning and message.
Banff National Park, Hwy 1, Alberta, Canada. Billboard LookUpBanff.com photo credit: Jason and Lorna Hardy
Banff National Park, Hwy 1, Alberta, Canada. Billboard LookUpBanff.com photo credit: Jamie Allen-Miller
For the record, David Keith's entire career is centered around the "solar geoengineering" issue which is exactly what the Canadian billboard was in fact about. With this in mind, let's consider the following quotes made about the billboard by Dr. Keith (in the CBC disinformation article).
"I think it's stunning and frightening because it is complete lunacy"
"A lot of people just believe things that normal science doesn't believe at all"
Watch this video and again consider Dr. Keith's quotes about geoengineering shown above. Bill Gates has even contributed to Dr. David Keith's and Dr. Ken Caldeira's efforts in the geoengineering field. If, after examining the CBC disinformation article, you feel the CBC author, Kyle Bakx, has been criminally deceptive, let him know what you think about his blatantly false and deceptive "reporting" by contacting Kyle Bakx directly. About Dr. David Keith and Dr. Ken Caldeira, if you are not OK with the part they are playing in the ongoing criminal climate engineering cover-up, tell them yourself (their contact links were given earlier in this article and are shown again at the bottom of this post). Communications should be done in a non threatening manner, though we can and should still point out to these individuals that once the public wakes up to the lethal deception, populations will undoubtedly hold those that participated in the criminal climate engineering cover-up legally and morally accountable. When messaging these individuals by email, it is important to openly cc as many other credible people as possible. Doing so further assists with the effort to expose those that are participating in the disinformation, and thus helps to hold them accountable for their actions.
Climate Engineering Cover-Up Continues In The US
Redding, California, has been and will continue to be an epicenter for the effort to expose the ongoing climate engineering crimes. Shasta Dam (the second largest in the country) is located just north of Redding and the Sacramento River (a primary source of the State's water) flows through Redding. Lab tests prove that the Sacramento River and tributaries are being contaminated by the toxic heavy metal and chemical climate engineering fallout (starting with aluminum). The fight to expose the climate engineering issue in Shasta County has been long and arduous, but not in vain. As more and more in the Redding area have awakened to the climate engineer atrocities, Northern California's primary newspaper (The Record Searchlight) has displayed rapidly increasingly tyrannical behavior. In a blatant effort to sensationalize headlines of total deception, the Searchlight avoids the use of hard science terms and instead focuses on launching personal attacks in order to distract from the real issue of the illegal covert climate engineering assault. The local page photo of the latest Record Searchlight disinformation and personal attack publication is below. This travesty of "journalism" was published on 8-19-16.
Recent Record Searchlight headline on cover of the local section of the newspaper
Why does it matter to even bother exposing this completely immoral propaganda publication for what they are? Because the anti-geoengineering legal action from LASG may concentrate in this region. By continuing to shine the light on the Searchlight's unethical conduct, once the climate engineering issue can no longer be hidden the citizens of Northern California will then fully realize the part the Record Searchlight staff played in hiding critical information from Shasta County citizens. This will assist us with the legal effort to fully expose the climate engineering assault and with reaching a critical mass of awareness on the issue. The corporate media owned Record Searchlight "newspaper" has not only completely blacked out any coverage of numerous past major community climate engineering awareness events in Redding, but is at the same time giving front page coverage of any and every disinformation propaganda that attempts to falsely marginalize the critical climate engineering issue.
The editor for the Record Searchlight is Silas Lyons. Below is a message from Mr. Lyons after he was confronted with the Searchlight's blackout of a major community climate engineering awareness gathering with over 1000 in attendance.
Thanks for your note. The Record Searchlight certainly has no monopoly on the public receiving information, and you've used the Internet, events and other channels pretty effectively from what I can tell. Because scientists and government agencies are actively exploring geoengineering — SRM, etc. — it may be that the reality will someday catch up with your claims. I expect our newspaper will carry many stories about the subject, as the idea of using technology to cool the planet in the future is a debate with enormous potential consequences and grave ethical questions. But your claims about present-day conspiracies to poison the planet are not rooted in that reality. We continue to believe it's our journalistic responsibility not to lend coverage and — by extension — credence to thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories.
Our position on this is consistent. As I told another correspondent, I recognize that by declining to participate in coverage we are fueling claims that there's a vast conspiracy and we are co-conspirators with our military, public servants and the entire body of mainstream science. I can't help that, as that is the very nature of conspiracy theories — and what makes them so elegantly self-perpetuating.
My response to Mr. Lyons:
Mr. Lyons, I would have expected a more plausible response from you than that which you put together, but I will say it is revealing. Have I ever stated there was a "conspiracy to poison the planet"? (stated in Searchlight article) No, that is just more spin from you and your publication which is what we have all come to expect. What I have always stated is that all available evidence indicates geoengineering is a reality, not just a "proposal". Our "claims" are "rooted" in countless lab tests done at state certified labs. Our "claims" are grounded in actual film footage of military tankers spraying at altitude with nozzles fully visible. Then there are the historical government documents, recent congressional documents calling for the global governance of geoengineering, , etc, the list goes on. The highly toxic heavy metal contamination is beyond dispute as already stated (proven by dozens of lab tests in Shasta County alone). The very dangerous UV radiation levels are also beyond dispute as metering proves. The ongoing spraying of our skies is beyond dispute as film footage proves. You have a moral and ethical responsibility to the community you claim to represent, Silas. You have repeatedly and willfully failed to uphold that responsibility. Did I ever claim there was a "vast conspiracy" that kept you from doing your job, no. Let me be clear, I simply believe you lack the moral fortitude to carry out your job, Mr. Lyons. You are entitled to your denial of the climate engineering reality, I grant you that, but there is absolutely no excuse for you to black out any coverage whatsoever of a major community event with about 1000 in attendance. A community event that featured testimony from our top local neurologist, from numerous former government scientists, from former military personnel, former defense industry technicians, A CEO from one of the worlds largest environmental and engineering consulting firms, etc. The public is rapidly waking up to the fact that media representatives like yourself are in fact not doing their jobs. Rather, in many cases (like this one) editors like you are going out of their way to omit stories that citizens have a right to hear about. The climate engineering/geoengineering reality cannot be hidden in plain sight much longer, the decimation related to these programs is becoming too great. Once the public is fully aware (especially in the North State), I believe they will want you to do some serious explaining, Silas. In the meantime, we will post communications like this so that everything is out in the open as I am sure you would want it to be. Again, Silas, to set the record straight, I have never said and don't believe there is a conspiracy linked to your decision to blackout this major community event, I simply believe you lack courage and are primarily focused on the protection of your paycheck and pension. Again, there is no rational justification for the editor of the primary local newspaper blacking out any and all coverage of a major community event with 1000 in attendance, local city officials in attendance, local physicians speaking along with testimony from former government scientists, a CEO a global environmental and engineering consulting firm with 10,000 employees, former defense industry personnel, former military personnel, etc. The citizens are waking up, Silas, and I can only imagine they will not be happy once they have a clear picture of reality and those that have done their best to hide it.
Who is the real Silas Lyons? How does he contribute to the greater good? The 1 minute video below is very revealing. In it Mr. Lyons displays his approach to dealing with ALS (a disease related to aluminum contamination and exposure), and the California drought (a direct result of climate engineering).
Searchlight editor, Silas Lyons, has exercised incredibly unethical behavior as "media" representative on which Northern California citizens depend.
More stellar examples of the Record Searchlight's completely unethical behavior have been displayed from the Searchlight's managing editor, Carole Ferguson.
Record Searchlight's managing editor, Carole Ferguson
After receiving a valid press release about a climate engineering/geoengineering/solar radiation management study, Ms. Feguson gave the following response.
A news release about a study by a chemtrail believer in a questionable journal posted to the PR Newswire does not add up to Reuters covering geoengineering.
And none of it matches sound scientific principles or even passes Occam’s Razor, which is why we don’t cover it.
Managing editorRecord Searchlight
1101 Twin View Blvd. • Redding, CA 96003
530-225-8232 • Fax – 530-225-8236
After the Searchlight's recent publication of the disinformation/personal attack article shown earlier, Robert Wegman, an attorney from the LASG team, sent the following letter to Searchlight managing editor, Carole Ferguson.
Dear Ms. Ferguson:
I am one of the attorneys with the Legal Alliance to Stop Geoeingeering ("LASG"). I just spoke with Jessica Skropanic who referred me to you. Jessica confirmed that your paper received the rebuttal piece written by Dane Wigington concerning the article your paper ran on August 19, 2016 by Damon Arthur entitled "Contrail or Chemtrail."
That editorial piece mentioned Dane Wigington by name and, frankly, parts of the article were patently false. Dane and, if necessary, the LASG should have an opportunity to respond to the unsupportable assertions made in the article. Moreover, we welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter openly with your staff. Our only goal is only to bring awareness to this dire issue and to hopefully stop it. I run a very busy practice as do all the other attorneys. We have all felt impelled to rally around this cause for the sake of our children. It's no more complicated than that.
To say what is happening in our skies is destructive to the earth's ecology is a gross understatement. Unless geoengineering immediately ceases, we will experience cataclysmic effects (including mass extinction) of biblical proportions. I think your readers would be quite interested to know about the clandestine work its government is doing to its unwitting subjects. Publishing articles filled with misinformation (disinformation) only serves to further lull the populace into complacency. It is no coincidence that California is experiencing the worst drought in history, while Texas and Louisiana have experienced historical flooding. It is also no coincidence that wild fires are burning faster and hotter than ever before. They are nearly uncontrollable. Dry vegetation and fire fueled by aluminum oxide will have that effect.
The LASG and Dane understand New York Times v. Sullivan gives the media nearly carte blanche to publish whatever it wishes, but Dane should be afforded the opportunity to have his voice heard and to set the record straight. We trust you agree. That is, after all, the very essence of editorializing.
I kindly ask you to advise whether Dane's piece will be published and when. Should you need to discuss this matter with me, my contact information is included below.
Robert L. Wegman, Esquire
THE LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT L. WEGMAN, PLC
Ms. Ferguson's reply:
Thanks for your interest in the letter sent by Dane Wigington.
We will not be publishing it. It will not clear our fact checking efforts.
We do not agree with your movement’s claims that the government is engaged in a plan to alter the weather using airplane exhaust.
Yes, there are studies on the effects of contrails on how they reflect sunlight back into space and thus may provide a cooling effect. Temperatures rose slightly after all planes were landed after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
And we acknowledge that climate change caused by too many fossil fuels – including jet fuel — is causing the more severe weather patterns such as drought and flooding.
But we follow real science and find that nearly all of Mr. Wigington’s claims to be false. It is against our policy to publish letters full of falsehoods.
Mr. Wigington had his chance to discuss his concerns when our reporter called him. But for the most part he didn’t say much and directed our reporter to a statement posted on Geoengineering.com.
I see where you suggest we can talk with Mr. Wigington about this further. Over the years, he and many others who follow him have discussed their beliefs at length with us. Another sit-down session would be futile for all sides.
The "letter to the editor" reply which I submitted in rebuttle to the Searchlight's disinformation/personal attack article (and which Ms. Ferguson flatly refused to print) was in complete conformity to the Searchlight's submission requirements. The refused submission is below.
Searchlight Blatantly Omits Facts On Critical Climate Engineering Issue
The Record Searchlight continues to demonstrate an unfortunate disregard for factual reporting. An article in the Friday edition of the paper (8-19-16) by Damon Arthur titled "Contrail or Chemtrail" is a glaring case in point. The "science study" (in reality an informal survey) which was the entire basis of the Searchlight post (clearly directed at me) is very deceptive. First, the Searchlight (and the propaganda report they published) chose to sensationalize with completely unscientific terms like "chemtrails" and thus they completely omit hard science terms that would have lead readers to real facts and data. Terms like "solar radiation management" (SRM), "stratospheric aerosol injection" (SAI), and "cloud albedo enhancement" (CAE). Instead of objectively reporting the science terms that relate to the subject of global climate engineering, the Searchlight falsely infers that this issue in question is about "a conspiracy to poison the planet". Mr. Arthur, since you have directed your hit piece toward me, can you now show your readers when and where I have ever, even once, recited such a statement? The "study" in question actually solicited 450 scientists, not 77 as the Searchlight (and the "study") falsely reported. Of that 450, nearly 84% were unwilling to even participate in the study. Why not? Could it be due to the fact that there is an illegal Federal gag order on ALL National Weather Service and ALL NOAA employees? Why is there a gag order? Why wasn't this illegal gag order reported by the Searchlight or the "study"? This means that of the total number of scientists surveyed, only slightly over 16% were even willing to respond. Why was this crucial fact also completely omitted? Next, the Searchlight repeatedly quotes the head of a disinformation website as if he is some sort of authority. The primary function of this individual and his site is to falsely discredit anyone who says anything negative about the actions of our government. Do the opinions of such an individual really belong in a "science study"? The Searchlight article author then falsely reports on the citizen attendance at a 2014 Shasta County Supervisors meeting on geoengineering by stating "dozens of people attended". In fact, at the peak of the supervisors meeting, there were estimated to be 500 people at the supervisors chambers. The supervisors admitted on film (posted at geoengineeringwatch.org) that the attendance was the largest in the facilities history. "A few dozen", Damon? Continuing, Damon Arthur did not bother to mention anything about the 750 page US Senate document that proves conclusively the US government has been heavily involved with international climate engineering programs for decades. Mr. Arthur further failed to mention that the head of the CIA, John Brennan, just spoke in front of the Council on Foreign Relations about geoengineering. There are also extensive historical presidential reports, military documents, and 160 geoengineering patents, (all posted at geoengineeringwatch.org). Finally, Damon and the Searchlight continue to completely omit any mention of the fact that a team of US attorneys (Legal Alliance To Stop Geoengineering) has started legal proceedings to expose climate engineering along with the agencies and officials that are helping to hide it by failing to disclose a proven and dangerous heavy metal contamination from the public. How would Mr. Arthur know about all this information? Because he telephoned me days before the Searchlight hit piece and I informed him of virtually every verifiable fact stated above, none of which Mr. Arthur bothered to report. The bottom line is this, the Record Searchlight has not honestly and objectively reported the facts.
A follow-up reply was then sent to Ms. Ferguson by the LASG legal team:
Double click to enlarge and read
The point of this example of corporate media tyranny is this, honorless individuals will continue to lie, falsely report, or completely omit whatever they want until the population as a whole takes a stand for truth and justice. The power structure could not continue to carry out their crimes if not for the complete and total obedience of the mainstream media machine of mass deception. How do we effectively push back? We start by taking the time to send articulate but direct (and non-threatening) messages to every individual that is participating in the criminal cover-up, whether actively or passively. Let them know that we know who they are, that we are not OK with their criminal behavior, and that once the crimes in question are fully exposed, we, society, will hold them legally and morally accountable. I am supplying some key email contacts for criminal propaganda perpetrators below for a starting point. Make your voice heard, forward the contacts to others so that they can continue and build the wave.
Dr. David Keith: http://keith.seas.harvard.edu/contact-us (click open the link to access email address)
Dr. Ken Caldeira: http://globalecology.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab/ (click open the link to access email address)
Record Searchlight editor, Silas Lyons: email@example.com
Record Searchlight managing editor, Carole Ferguson: firstname.lastname@example.org
Record Searchlight journalist, Damon Arthur: email@example.com
CBC "reporter", Kyle Bakx: http://www.cbc.ca/calgary/contact/reporters.html
The completely controlled criminal cabal, that masquerades as legitimate media, are relentlessly continuing with their efforts to cast doubt on the climate engineering reality. These efforts are becoming rapidly more outlandish and transparent. In California the attempt to pass a new bill, AB1671, is yet another effort to hide the truth about vaccines, the medical industry criminality as a whole, and countless other issues. There is a proven link between mosquito spray and autism, and the Zika spraying is out of control. In the meantime, the Pentagon has lost hundreds of thousands of guns in Afghanistan and Iraq. Mass species die-off continues around the globe, our planet has been decimated in the geologic blink of an eye. The August 27th addition of Global Alert News is below.
The recent double screening of the profoundly important VAXXED documentary in Northern California was a big success in spite of the total media blackout of the event. Hundreds of Northern California citizens attended this free public screening along with many more from further south in the state, and from other parts of the country. Connecting with Del Bigtree was a great pleasure and a true honor. At this most critical "time of universal deceit", when "telling the truth is a revolutionary act", Del is a shining example for us all. This 11 minute interview with Del gives a glimpse into one of the primary driving personalities behind the critically important VAXXED documentary.
The ongoing and completely out of control experimentation with Earth's climate and life support systems is destroying what is yet left of the biosphere at blinding speed. The power structure is pushing back hard with new waves of propaganda in the desperate attempt to hide reality from the population till the last possible moment. I could never count the times I have been asked why would "they" (those in power) do this to themselves? Countless times I have given a long list of examples of all that "they" have already done to themselves (and to the rest of the biosphere). The detonation of over 2000 nuclear weapons has contaminated the entire planet. Fukushima is a triple nuclear volcano with no known technology to end the nightmare, and yet "they" are already building 60 more nuclear plants while putting old and dilapidated facilities back on line. Then there is the fact that "they" (central bankers at the core) have constructed enough nuclear weapons to mathematically exterminate all life on Earth some 12000 times over. "They" are not sane, but the following quote must also be considered, "We have seen the enemy and he is us". Apathy, complacency, and outright denial within the ranks of global populations, has so far been the primary factor that has allowed and actually facilitated the cancerous cabal of criminality to expand completely unchecked for so many decades. If the current course of certain demise is to be altered, we must all help to pull the weight of the battle at hand. The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.
A key path to exposing those behind the curtain is to expose the media cowards who help to hide them, this effort will also require all of us. What are our priorities?
Ken Caldeira, David Keith, And Carnegie “Science”, The Face Of The Criminal Climate Engineering Cover-up
The power structure's propaganda machine has been put into high gear in a last ditch desperate attempt to hide the ongoing geoengineering planetary omnicide till the last possible moment. Geoengineer Ken Caldeira and Carnegie "Science" have teamed up on a "peer reviewed "study/survey" to "prove" "chemtrails" are not real.
The key image in the science diagram above is the jet spraying "reflective particles" shown in the upper left. Though ocean iron fertilization is also a catastrophic form of geoengineering that is ongoing, the other images (space mirrors and artificial trees) are completely implausible and meant to distract from the reality of the actual geoengineering programs.
The science terms for what is occurring in our skies were of course completely avoided by Caldeira and Carnegie "Science" as such terms would lead people to hard science data and that was of course NOT the goal of the "study/survey". This "peer reviewed" study claims that the vast majority of scientists agreed "chemtrails" were not real (again, the scientists were not asked about the geoengineering/climate modification subject). So, in addition to the inaccurate terms in the "survey", did the vast majority of scientists surveyed really confirm that "chemtrails" were not real? NO, here are the real numbers from the "survey", 475 scientists were solicited for this survey, only 78 responded, that is only just over 16%. Why didn't the rest of the scientists excuse themselves from the survey? Keep reading and find out. When the climate engineering crimes are fully exposed to populations around the globe (once and for all), a complete overturning of our paradigm will commence and those in power know it. The ongoing weather warfare that has been carried out for over 70 years has equally and irreparably harmed every person on the planet along with the entire web of life. The 2 minute video below shows up-close from directly behind a jet aircraft what is inarguably atmospheric spraying occurring. This is only one shocking example, there are countless others.
The power structure and the criminals who serve them are completely committed to hiding the geoengineering/solar radiation management/climate intervention programs from the public for as long as possible. The effort to bring the climate engineering insanity to light is gaining ground rapidly. This has caused the global controllers to push back with a pathetic piece of total propaganda that does not in any objective way, shape, or form, address the mountain of material facts which conclusively confirm that global climate engineering has long since been deployed. The propaganda "study" in question (which attempts to dispute the geoengineering reality based on the "opinions" of selected academicians) has been republished and reposted by numerous corporate controlled "media" sources that are clearly tasked with serving the global power structure. Who is a primary face that we can place on the machine of criminal deception regarding the ongoing illegal geoengineering assault? Internationally recognized geoengineer Ken Caldeira has been playing a central role in the ongoing public propaganda and deception for a very long time (along with geoengineer David Keith). Caldeira and Keith are clearly heavily committed to the effort to hiding the ongoing climate engineering assault by any means possible. Caldeira has long since teamed up with Carnegie "Science" which has known connections to the defense industry. A look into Caldeira's past government defense department employment is shocking and revealing. In the damning 2 minute video below you can hear Caldeira describe in his own words what he worked on while employed by the US government.
Internationally known geoengineer Dr. David Keith is in the same business as Caldeira, public deception. The 5 minute video below (which features Dr. David Keith, Ken Caldeira, and Obama science advisor, John Holdren), is very revealing and especially damning for geoengineer, Dr. David Keith.
Dr. David Keith was also very effectively exposed by Stephen Colbert in this next 6 minute video.
Caldeira's "report" of the "survey" he spearheaded is so full of omissions and completely skewed information that it is difficult to find a starting point with setting the record straight.
- 1. Science terms were systematically avoided in the propaganda "report" pieced together by Caldeira, Keith, and company. If readers were shown terms like "solar radiation management" (SRM), "stratospheric aerosol geoengineering" (SAG), "cloud albedo enhancement" (CAE), "Stratospheric aerosol injection" (SAI), inquiring individuals might actually investigate the issue and find there is a mountain of science facts to back up claims that climate engineering has long since been fully deployed. Instead (and not surprisingly), Caldeira and crew exclusively used the "chemtrails" term (with one exception) which is not a science term and by design does not lead to credible data.
- 2. Why didn't Ken Caldeira and associates disclose the fact that not only do all US government scientists have no first amendment protection (which means they are not at liberty to speak openly), but there is actually an ILLEGAL FEDERAL GAG ORDER ON ALL NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE AND ALL NOAA EMPLOYEES. Are we to believe that any scientists are truly free to speak openly on a subject that is clearly a national security issue at a time when any and all whistleblowers are being relentlessly prosecuted? The ONLY scientists that might be willing to speak out under such circumstances are those that know full well they will be rewarded for supporting the official propaganda and deception.
- 3. Why didn't Caldeira and his associates bother to mention massive historical senate documents, presidential reports, and military statements of objective that make clear climate engineering is not just theory or conjecture, but has long since been verifiable fact.
- 4. Why didn't Caldeira make mention of the extensive list of geoengineering patents that describe exactly what we can see with our own eyes occurring in the skies above?
- 5. Why didn't Caldeira cover the design characteristics of the "high bypass turbofan jet engine"? This engine is mounted on ALL military tankers and ALL commercial carriers and is by design nearly incapable of creating any condensation trails except under the rarest and most extreme circumstances.
- 6. Why didn't this report from Caldeira and Carnegie "science" address the fact that there are retrofit spray nozzles mounted on the aircraft pylons directly above the jet exhaust stream? This is to create appearance of "condensation trails" when in fact what we are seeing are sprayed particulate trails.
- 7. Caldeira's report omitted any reference to the critical issue of a rapidly worsening "global dimming" scenario which is the direct objective of the ongoing geoengineering SRM programs (to block the sun's direct rays with light scattering particles).
- 8. Caldeira's "study" claims that the massive amounts of aluminum showing up in precipitation tests could not be accurate. Yet, we have geoengineers like Dr. David Keith stating on the record the goal of spraying 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 tons of aluminum nanoparticulates in to the atmosphere annually . Much of the precipitation testing that reveals massive amounts of aluminum in the breathable air column has been done by highly credentialed former government scientists/biologists who have done such testing for decades. Globally recognized medical experts like Dr. Russell Blaylock acknowledge the severe human health dangers from such aluminum exposure. Recent peer reviewed science studies have now proven that massive aluminum exposure is also killing our bees.
- 9. Yet another issue of critical importance that is completely omitted from the Caldeira study is the extreme ozone layer destruction that is occurring around the globe. Available science study makes clear that geoengineering will destroy the ozone layer and that is exactly what is occurring.
- 10. The Caldeira/Carnegie "report" did not mention the recent statement made about geoengineering by the head of the CIA, John Brennan, in front of the Council on Foreign Relations.
- 11. Finally, and most crucial of all, the biosphere is free falling into a state of total meltdown with massive methane releases occurring from Earth's strata and is possibly even pushing us toward a scenario known as Venus syndrome. Are we to believe that the US military would first ask our permission before engaging in climate engineering when the top US military leadership has long since stated on the record that the disintegrating climate is the greatest and most immediate national security threat of all?
- 12. Caldeira's "study" of course did not mention legal actions which are already in process to expose climate engineering that are already underway in Canada and the US.
Click the link below to go directly to the LASG website
So what is the bottom line with the Caldeira/Carnegie "study"? The unspun truth is this, there were no relevant facts in Caldeira's purely propaganda piece, none. Only the opinions of selective individuals that have no choice but to repeat the official government narrative of climate engineering denial. To do otherwise would lead to the loss of their careers or worse. The Caldeira/Carnegie "science study" has completely omitted mountains of relevant data (some of which has already been cited), but the "study" in question has also not made any reference to the on the record testimony of numerous experts who have stated conclusively that global climate engineering is an absolute real and ongoing reality. These expert testimonies include former US government scientists, union of concerned scientist members, former pilots, former defense industry technicians, and physicians.
Caldeira's final statement from the "study" is below, does anyone see a single fact cited in Caldeira's rant?
“Despite the persistence of erroneous theories about atmospheric chemical spraying programs, until now there were no peer-reviewed academic studies showing that what some people think are ‘chemtrails’ are just ordinary contrails, which are becoming more abundant as air travel expands. Also, it is possible that climate change is causing contrails to persist for longer periods than they used to.” Caldeira said. “I felt it was important to definitively show what real experts in contrails and aerosols think. We might not convince die-hard believers that their beloved secret spraying program is just a paranoid fantasy, but hopefully their friends will accept the facts.”
Caldiera states above "it is possible that climate change is causing 'contrails' to persist for longer periods than ye used to". Lets examine this statement. For "condensation trails" to increase and last longer there MUST BE more relative humidity in the atmosphere, but is this the case? The global RH graph below could not be more clear, atmospheric RH has been going down for over 60 years.
Atmospheric RH began to drop in direct correlation with the initial deployment of climate engineering programs in the mid to late 1940's. The climate engineering materials are dessicants and create an overall drying effect on the atmosphere. The global dimming effect of SRM programs further dries out the atmosphere overall (though record deluges will continue to increase as the planet rapidly warms and/or due to climate engineering/weather warfare). Again, Mr. Caldeira, when atmospheric RH is dropping radically, why would "condensation trails" increase radically?
If you think Ken Caldeira and David Keith should be exposed to the public at large for their part in the criminal climate engineering cover-up, tell them so yourself and share their contacts and this post with others so they can do the same (Keith's and Caldeira's contacts are hyperlinked to their names above). Such communications should be done in a professional, articulate, and peaceful manner. Attaching credible informational links to any communications sent is also important. Anyone and everyone that is actively or passively participating in the criminal cover-up of the global climate engineering assault should be publicly exposed in the same manner.
It is rationally incomprehensible that we now live in a global society in which so many in academia are in one way or another muzzled, or outright lying in an apparent attempt to secure their paychecks and pensions. Climate engineering is obviously, undeniably, and verifiably occurring in skies all over the globe. The creation of "Weather Made To Order" has been openly discussed by scientists since the 1950s. The public is finally starting to look up and thankfully beginning to re-activate their sense of reason and logic. The climate engineering/weather warfare assault cannot be hidden in plain sight for much longer. Once fully exposed populations around the globe will unite in a shockwave of anger and outrage at what their governments have done to them (and to the planet's life support systems as a whole). This anger and outrage from global populations will certainly extend to all those in academia and the media who have made themselves accessories to the climate engineering crimes by actively or passively participating in the ongoing cover-up. Make your voice heard, we must all do our part in the most critical effort to expose the truth, our time is running out.
The global weather warfare/biological warfare assault that is being waged against populations and the entire web of life is now becoming all but impossible to hide or deny. The power structure controlled mainstream media weapon of criminal propaganda has recently launched an all out disinformation campaign to try and fortify the official denial of the geoengineering atrocities that are clearly occurring in our skies. Chuck Norris has drafted yet another hard hitting statement of facts in his unyielding effort to expose the ongoing global climate engineering assault and the government's increasingly desperate attempt to hide it. Our deepest and most sincere gratitude to you, Mr. Norris.
A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP OF EPIC PROPORTIONS
Exclusive: Chuck Norris Warns Of 'Grave' Risks Of Climate Intervention
Source: WND, article by Chuck Norris
Last week, I addressed how CIA Director John Brennan gave a historic speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, confessing something few thought they would ever hear: the federal government’s explicit and intentional climate intervention via operations like stratospheric aerosol spraying or injections, or SAI.
What I didn’t explain is that SAI is a ginormous federal geo-engineering cover-up that is now being exposed, and yet not a single mainstream media outlet has reported on it. Let me explain.
In April, the U.S. Senate directed the Department of Energy (DOE) “to review the findings of the National Academy of Sciences (or NAS) report,” “Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth,” and “to study the potential impacts of albedo modification (or solar radiation management), a potential method of geoengineering,” which included “smaller scale field trials.”
Science magazine explained: “Albedo modification would work by lacing the atmosphere with tiny particles or aerosols that would reflect sunlight and mimic natural processes. For example, in 1991 the volcano Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which spans altitudes from 10 to 50 kilometers. There, the sulfur dioxide produced aerosols that reflected enough sunlight to reduce global temperature by an estimated 0.3°C for 3 years. Albedo modification might also work by using aerosols to seed cloud formation in a lower atmospheric layer called the troposphere.”
The U.S. Senate pushed the DOE to pursue albedo modification action a couple months before CIA Director Brennan gave his blessing to stratospheric spraying as a government operation that “potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change.”
What’s crazy about all that government endorsement is that the February 2015 NAS report, on which the feds base their entire toxic rain operation, “warned explicitly that albedo modification shouldn’t be deployed now because the risks and benefits were far too uncertain.”
What are those risks? Here are just three grave consequences that we know about:
Drought: The team under Chien Wang, a co-author of the NAS study and a senior research scientist at MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, concluded that albedo modification would lead “to dangerous changes in global weather: Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically.”
Loss of blue sky: According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science explained, “Releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere should in theory reduce global temperatures by reflecting a small percentage of the incoming sunlight away from the Earth. However, the extra particles would also scatter more of the remaining light into the atmosphere. This would reduce by 20 percent the amount of sunlight that takes a direct route to the ground, and it would increase levels of softer, diffuse scattered light,” making the sky appear hazier.
Hazards to human health and other earth life: The gravest of all consequences of atmospheric aerosol spraying is that, simply put, what’s sprayed above us settles down upon us and in us, as well as other life on earth.
Photo credit: Penny Oliphant
The U.S. government’s own National Center for Biotechnology Information, or NCBI, released a report in January 2016, the goal of which was “Assessing the direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with stratospheric aerosols.” The NCBI concluded: “Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment of stratospheric aerosols. Little is known about the toxicity of some likely candidate aerosols, and there is no consensus regarding acceptable levels for public exposure to these materials. There is also little infrastructure in place to evaluate potential public health impacts in the event that stratospheric aerosols are deployed for solar radiation management.”
Another colleague and co-author, Dr. Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, the Louis Block professor in geophysical sciences at the University of Chicago, and Sweden’s King Carl XVI Gustafn, chairman in environmental science at Stockholm’s University, took it one step further. He warned, “The nearly two years’ worth of reading and animated discussions that went into this study have convinced me more than ever that the idea of ‘fixing’ the climate by hacking the Earth’s reflection of sunlight is wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad” (that is why Dr. Pierrehumbert prefers to call albedo modification by the name “albedo hacking”).
Dr. Pierrehumber added: “The report describes albedo modification frankly as involving large and partly unknown risks. It states outright that albedo modification ‘should not be deployed.'”
So, why are the U.S. Senate and CIA director disregarding the dire and passionate warnings of scientists like Dr. Pierrehumbert and Dr. Fleming by demanding that the Department of Energy proceed with trials on geo-engineering? In the words of Dr. Pierrehumber, are they “wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad”? Answer: Yes!
Is it a mere coincidence that the very government agencies that are spraying our stratosphere with toxic chemicals were the actual sponsors of the NAS report? The NAS itself confessed: “The study was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, U.S. intelligence community, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Department of Energy” (italics mine).
Isn’t that like your right hand quoting your left hand so that your right hand can grab what it’s already holding? Is the NAS report another government push and ploy to collaborate and cite “scientific proof” to justify its clandestine climate agenda? Why else would the CIA and U.S. Senate be proceeding in climate aerosol spraying when the very scientists preparing the study warned, “Stop! Don’t do it! It’s crazy and dangerous!”
The most colossal and tragic of all government cover-ups is the fact that the feds have been waging climate warfare for more than 30 years, lacing our clouds and stratosphere with dangerous nano-particles, including environmental sulfates, black carbon, metallic aluminum and aluminum oxide aerosols. The truth is, for decades, the feds have been covertly and overtly running sky criminal operations behind (above!) our backs, leaving humans and the rest of the planet life as lab rats of their toxic cocktail fallout.
Photo credit: Austin Clark
Geoengineeringwatch.org reported that a 1978 750-page congressional report was recently discovered with a mountain of information going back decades that “confirms the ongoing extensive involvement of our government in climate modification/weather warfare. This document also confirms the involvement of foreign governments around the globe, even governments that would otherwise have been considered ‘hostile to US interests.'”
Why hasn’t a single mainstream media outlet reported on the CIA and DOE’s march forward with SAI when the scientific community has explicitly and repeatedly warned against it?
Why are geo-engineering researchers being stonewalled by government and media?
And why in hell are watchdogs on both the left and right dodging the feds’ intentional and hazardous climate intervention, when they seek to uncover government cover-ups and conspiracies with the most scant of evidence?
Dane Wigington, the lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org and a fierce fighter for government geoengineering transparency, was absolutely right when he wrote: “How big does the climate engineering elephant in the room need to be before it can no longer be hidden in plain site? How much more historical proof do we need of the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare before the denial of the masses crumbles? When will populations around the globe bring to justice all those responsible for the ongoing and rapidly worsening worldwide weather warfare assault?”
Is it a mere coincidence that, in October 2015, the feds put a universal “gag order” on agency employees in “The National Weather Service,” the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration” and the “U.S. Dept. of Commerce”?
Is it a mere coincidence that the Obama administration has spent more taxpayer monies for legal prosecutions of government whistleblowers than all other U.S. presidents combined, resulting in 31 times the jail sentences?
It’s time to blow the lid off the government’s climate cover-up!
That is why my wife, Gena, and I encourage citizens everywhere to do their own research on geo-engineering and then write their government representatives to demand action. We also encourage the support of the Legal Alliance of lawyers now amassed as a united front to fight the geo-engineering government cover-up in court.
To read or learn more immediately, I highly recommend the work and website of Dane Wigington. GeoEngineeringWatch.org is loaded with great research on the many facets of climate intervention.
Source: WND, article by Chuck Norris
The sand in the hourglass is rapidly running out while the majority of the human race remains locked into the paradigm of power structure programmed denial. From the verifiable vaccination dangers, to the clearly visible climate engineering assault, to the maneuvering toward WWlll, so many have completely abandoned their sense of deductive reasoning in exchange for the official narrative. Will unfolding global cataclysms on every front force the masses to wake from their slumber in time to salvage what is left of Earth's life support systems? The August 13th installment of Global Alert News is below.
The challenges we collectively face are not out on the horizon somewhere, they are already here. All our voices are essential in the fight for the greater good, we are out of time.
Internationally known celebrity Chuck Norris continues to show exceptional courage by yet again publicly addressing the critical climate engineering issue in an extremely direct, articulate, and forceful manner. Mr. Norris has previously addressed the geoengineering issue and the power structure's attempt to silence anti-geoengineering researches and informational sites. Now, in the article below, he continues his examination of global geoengineering, and publicly states his warnings on this extremely dire issue. Let's hope that other well known personalities take a much needed example from Chuck Norris's unyielding moral fortitude. I wish to extend my deepest regard and respect to Mr. Norris for his steadfast and courageous effort to take a critically needed stand for the greater good and for recommending GeoengineeringWatch.org as a reference site.
CIA DIRECTOR CONFESSES STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL INJECTION
Exclusive: Chuck Norris sees signs of 'geo-engineering government cover-up'
Source: WND, article by Chuck Norris
The smoking gun is definitely still smoking. CIA Director John Brennan shot another round of evidence in the proof that our government is involved in climate intervention or weather warfare.
In June, CIA director John Brennan gave a historical speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, confessing something few thought they would ever hear.
To set the context, Brennan’s speech addressed threats to national and global security, cyber attacks, hacking, as well as biological warfare and other potential threats. But what caught listening ears and raised eyebrows was Brennan’s lengthy discussion about geo-engineering – intentional climate intervention via operations like atmospheric aerosol spraying or injections.
Liberals defended Brennan’s big government speech by explaining that he didn’t actually say the feds were presently engaging in geo-engineering. The truth is, he would have been foolish to do so because, as you’ll learn, many eminent scientists have warned Washington about the extreme dangers of climate intervention, not to mention the public outcry would be massive.
Brennan spoke at length about the future use of geo-engineering. And if you listen carefully to his words, you can even hear innuendos of a government that has already tested its effectiveness. How else could he be so confident of its utility?
Another example is the array of technologies, often referred to collectively as geoengineering, that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI: a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures, and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world at the expense of other regions could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI and other geoengineering initiatives.
Photo credit: Zenonas Mockus
What is striking but not surprising is the missing link in Brennan’s “challenges”: namely, climate intervention’s threat to humans and other life on earth. Outside of the many adverse and consequential environmental affects of seeding the stratosphere, which we will hear about from renowned scientists in my next column, there is the toxic fallout of particles upon human life. Or does the Obama administration really think that injecting sulfate aerosol precursors and designed nanoparticles into the stratosphere will not result in grave health effects when they literally rain down upon us?
The U.S. government’s National Center for Biotechnology Information, or NCBI, just released a report in January 2016 regarding “Assessing the direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with stratospheric aerosols.” In the report, it describes “the potential direct occupational and public health impacts of exposures to aerosols likely to be used for SRM [Solar Radiation Management], including environmental sulfates, black carbon, metallic aluminum, and aluminum oxide aerosols.”
The NCBI concluded: “Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment of stratospheric aerosols. Little is known about the toxicity of some likely candidate aerosols, and there is no consensus regarding acceptable levels for public exposure to these materials. There is also little infrastructure in place to evaluate potential public health impacts in the event that stratospheric aerosols are deployed for solar radiation management.”
Did anyone pass this health report to CIA Director John Brennan?
Let’s be clear about at least one thing: Despite that those on the right and the left (including our president) have denied the government’s use of stratospheric aerosol spraying in the past, chemtrailing just collapsed as conspiracy. The climate cat is now out of the bag!
But President Obama already told us this was coming, or has come.
Back in February 2013, Obama warned Capitol Hill: “If Congress won’t act soon [on climate change] to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future. …”
In January 2015, he repeated his threat: “If we do not act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration, conflict, and hunger around the globe. The Pentagon says that climate change poses immediate risks to our national security. We should act like it.”
No wonder Obama said about himself, “Call me the rainmaker.”
But no one ever told us that the rain coming down upon us would be toxic!
And where is the “Environmental Protection Agency” when we need it? It is in the stratospheric aerosol injection bed with the rest of the administration!
The question is: Is there hard evidence for a government cover-up of its already-active stratospheric aerosol injection program?
To find out that answer, please don’t miss my column next week. In it, I will explain the CIA’s direct involvement in geo-engineering (particularly SAI) and demonstrate how the agency is using the National Academy of Sciences to produce a report that the Obama administration can manipulate to the public to justify its sky crimes. I’ll also show how the U.S. Senate is swallowing the pro-geo-engineering bait hook, line and sinker, and how a massive multiple-agency government gag order and unprecedented whistleblower penalties are suppressing those on the inside from leaking or confirming the feds present geo-engineering operations. Lastly, I’ll discuss what you can do to help blow the lid off of the government’s covert operations.
To read or learn more immediately, I highly recommend the work and website of Dane Wigington. GeoEngineeringWatch.org is loaded with great research on the many facets of geo-engineering. In addition, we encourage support of the Legal Alliance of pro-bono lawyers now amassed as a unified front to fight the geo-engineering government cover-up in court.
Source: WND, article by Chuck Norris
On Friday, August 5th, 2016, an all day free public awareness and call to action event was carried out in the Northern California City of Redding. The event covered extreme vaccination dangers, climate engineering, and the unimaginable government tyranny that is inflicted on whistleblowers and the population as a whole. The groundbreaking documentary VAXXED was screened in the afternoon and again in the evening. The film producers (Del Bigtree and Polly Tommey) and the director (Dr. Andrew Wakefield) were present for extensive Q and A sessions after each screening. Dr Sherri Tenpenny joined the very informative VAXXED Q and A panel discussions in addition to carrying out her own hard hitting powerpoint presentation. A climate engineering update presentation on the dire state of the biosphere was presented by myself (Dane Wigington). An exposé on government criminal conduct was delivered from former CIA officer Kevin Shipp.
Some of the day's speakers. From left to right: Del Bigtree (Vaxxed producer), Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org), Kevin Shipp (former CIA officer), and Dr. Andrew Wakefield (VAXXED director).
The three photos above were taken in the early morning before the doors to all day event were opened. Photo credit: Alan Ernesto Phillips
I wish to extend my deepest and most sincere gratitude to all of the extremely dedicated volunteers who worked so hard to make this all day and into the night (9am to 10pm) public awareness event such a success. The photo above only includes a portion of the hard working activists that gave their time and energy to this event.
The Cascade Theater was an exceptional location for this critically important gathering. My most sincere gratitude to the Cascade management and staff for all their help with the event.
Post presentation questions from some attendees that traveled considerable distances to attend.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny gave a powerful presentation on vaccine dangers and the coming mandatory vaccinations for adults.
The VAXXED crew arrives at the event.
The incredibly dedicated VAXXED team, Dr. Andrew Wakefield (VAXXED director), Polly Tommey (VAXXED producer), and Del Bigtree (VAXXED pruducer) at the entry to the historic Cascade Theatre
Backstage with Dr. Wakefield, Del Bigtree, Kevin Shipp, and one of the event videographers, Alan Ernesto Phillips.
Dr. Wakefield and one of the VAXXED film crew are shown with Dawn Winkler who tragically lost her daughter due to a vaccine reaction. Dawn was interviewed at the event by the Vaxxed team.
Attendees (who came from considerable distances in many cases) gathering free informational materials in the event lobby to help continue raising awareness in their own regions.
Former CIA officer Kevin Shipp presenting his powerful testimony to the audience.
Activists Lori Bridgeford and Sharon Beckwith worked diligently starting a full six weeks prior to the event and continued their pace right through the event day.
The Redding awareness/call to action event would not have been possible without the tireless work and dedication of numerous activists who are completely and unselfishly committed to the cause. My most sincere gratitude to all the volunteers and activists whose assistance was absolutely essential for the success of this event. I also wish to express my deepest thanks to all the activists in the field who are working tirelessly to help sound the alarm each and every day all over the country and throughout the world. The battle for the greater good is a team effort, all of us are essential to the cause. The entire event was professionally filmed by multiple videographers. We will post individual videos of presentations and interviews conducted backstage at the event as they become available from the production crew. The walls continue to close in from countless directions, we must all make the most of every single day in regard to our efforts to sound the alarm and wake the masses. As expected (and as was the case with last years event) Northern California Media completely blacked out any coverage whatsoever of this event in spite of receiving multiple press releases. Exposing the truth is up to us.