Search Results for: uvc

UVC: The Sterilization Of Planet Earth, Part One

August 5, 2021     28 Comments
Share

Dane Wigington
GeoengineeringWatch.org

Earth’s life preserving ozone layer is deteriorating at blinding speed, covert climate engineering operations are the single greatest causal factor. If this destruction is allowed to continue unabated, the total collapse of the ozone layer will soon determine our collective fate. UVC radiation is now reaching the surface of the planet, this DNA damaging spectrum of solar radiation is the last spectrum of UV before x-rays. Geoengineering Watch has monitored the ever increasing UVC radiation for many years while trying simultaneously to sound the alarm. In this video report a former NASA contract engineer sends a dire warning.

PART ONE

All are needed in the critical battle to wake populations to what is coming, we must make every day count. Share credible data from a credible source, make your voice heard. Awareness raising efforts can be carried out from your own home computer.
DW

Must view, THE DIMMING, our most comprehensive climate engineering documentary:​

Read More

The “Forum For Climate Engineering Assessment” Interviews Dane Wigington From GeoengineeringWatch.org

February 14, 2017     162 Comments
Share

Dane Wigington
GeoengineeringWatch.org

Official institutions are still attempting to mask the ongoing climate engineering atrocities by parroting the "official narrative" of denial. The "Forum For Climate Engineering Assessement" recently contacted GeoengineeringWatch.org and requested an interview with me. The fact that institutional organizations feel they need to engage in such interviews is a clear sign that our combined efforts are gaining ground in the battle to reach a critical mass of awarenes. Some excerpts from their mission statement are below:

Mission Statement

The Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment’s (FCEA) overarching objective is to assess the social, ethical, political, and legal implications of emerging technologies that fall under the broad rubric of climate engineering (sometimes referred to as “climate geoengineering”). We produce high-quality and policy-relevant research and commentary, and work in a variety of ways ensure that the climate engineering conversation maintains a focus on issues of justice, equity, agency, and inclusion.

Scope of Work

  • Facilitation of climate engineering research in the academic sector.

Our work in this context includes: ongoing development of a timeline that chronicles the history of climate geoengineering and provides access to critical source materials; an occasional paper series; and development of a range of other materials for teaching and research on the social and political implications of climate engineering.

The 18 minute interview I did for this "Climate Engineering Assessment" group is below (full audio and full transcript). Whatever the overal agenda was behind this interview was (perhaps to try and marginalize those that are completely committed to exposing the climate engineering assault), the interviewer, Holly Buck, was cordial and professional. This being said, Ms. Buck has made her position on geoengineering clear. Though she claims climate engineering is only a "proposal", she advocates for all the "benifits" of deploying climate engineering/SRM programs.  Publically denying existing climate engineering is likely a mandatory position for any in academia who wish to preserve their paychecks and pensions. Does this excuse the denial of academia? Absolutely not. There are volumes of verifiable facts, documents, and film footage which confirm the ongoing climate engineering reality. Unfortunately, academia (as a whole) refuses to honestly speak out about the ongoing geoengineering insanity. The recent illegal federal gag order on all NWS and NOAA employees is certainly one of the reasons why. Whatever the hurdles to speaking out, academia's betrayal of the public trust must be brought to light.  The only way forward in the battle to expose and halt the ongoing weather warfare assault is to reach a critical mass of awareness with global populations, this effort will take all of us. Again, whatever the agenda of the interviewing institution may have been, the fact that they carried out this interview at all will help us carry the message to the halls of academia.
DW

An Interview with Dane Wigington of Geoengineering Watch

By Holly Buck

Recently, I talked with Dane Wigington of geoengineeringwatch.org.

This site often features at the top of Google results for informational searches such as “geoengineering”, “geoengineering definition”, “examples of geoengineering”, etc.

You can listen to the interview or read the transcript below.

Note to listeners: I do not share Dane’s view that there is an ongoing deployment of solar radiation management.

Dane Wigington 11

Dane Wigington of Geoengineering Watch

Holly: I was hoping we could start out by hearing a bit more about your site.

Dane: Our site, geoengineeringwatch.org, is simply a informational repository. We are nonpolitical. We don’t sell anything. We are simply trying to put data forward to the public so they can examine information on the geoengineering, climate engineering, solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection subjects; and come to their own conclusions.

Holly: Can you tell us more about the scope of your site — who uses it, and how they find it?

Dane: Well, we have about 20,000 visitors a day and we’re over 25 million total visitors. Any search engine, if you search the word “geoengineering”, we are typically at the top of that list. Sometimes ahead of Wikipedia, so we are not hard to find. Again, we stick to the science terms and the science issues and data to back that up, so again, not hard to find if someone searches the subject of “geoengineering”.

Holly: Given that international readership, do you have a “typical” reader? Do you have return readers? Or is mostly people from all around the world who are just searching for information about this?

Dane: Well in Google Analytics, we can search fairly accurately as to who’s getting on, and we have broad, expansive demographics, if you will. Everyone from military organizations, agencies, general public and everything in between. So we’ve had very high numbers of agency people on the site as well. In fact, when we published the 60 day notice of pending legal action from our legal alliance to stop geoengineering legal team, within 3 hours, I heard from Marcia McNutt. I think you know who she is, perhaps. National Academy of Sciences. So, she apparently had looked within three hours of us posting. So there’s a wide range of people looking at this data.

Holly: I would like to back up a little bit and hear your views on climate change. I was reading one of your articles recently, where you talked about runaway global warming, and my understanding is that you believe that people are doing geoengineering to either stop or cover up the runaway warming. Is that a correct reading?

Dane:  I think all available science data backs up that conclusion. I mean, I think you’re studying the issue of solar radiation management, and that is the purpose of the proposal of those programs, which again, we would argue the data indicates its long since been deployed.

The problem … there are some in the anti-climate engineering movement that have not accepted the fact that the planet is in full-blown meltdown. I gave global warming lectures before I focused everything on the climate engineering issue. But I don’t think we can argue logically, any of us, that the planet’s … what would be mathematically, statistically in a runaway greenhouse effect right now.

And we’re seeing statistically, an under-reporting of official high temperatures. Not an over-reporting as many people would like to convince themselves of, but we’re seeing an under-reporting. That means it’s even hotter than what we’re officially being told. And we are seeing significant under-reporting. Two, three, four, five degrees; so how hot is it really, if we looked at accurate data? And I would argue the data is being falsified. But in the opposite direction of what, unfortunately, many people choose to think. They think it’s being over-reported. It’s being radically under-reported.

The planet, I would argue, is much further into the warming curve than we are being told. And climate engineering is the last ditch effort to try to mask that fact from the public as long as possible.

Holly: There’s been a lot of talk lately in the media about so-called “fake news”. Some even say we are in a post-truth era. And I’m curious how you approach the topic of fake news, I mean, people must send you articles all the time. You’re a writer yourself, so how do you decide what’s real and what’s fake?

Dane: It needs to be verifiable. Period. And if we have, let’s look at the subject of climate engineering and the fact that all available data indicates it’s long since been deployed.

Our legal team; again, The Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering, surveyed fifteen hundred climate scientists and meteorologists. Fifteen hundred. We published the full list of the contacts, every individual, so the authenticity of this could be verified. Not one, of fifteen hundred climate scientists surveyed — and your listeners can look this up on our site — not one was willing to deny on the record that climate engineering, solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection, had already been deployed. Not one.

When we post articles, for example, 750 page congressional documents, historical presidential reports, all referring to global ongoing weather/climate modification operations, we let the listener or the reader decide for themselves. Those documents are real, verifiable, available on government archives. The data is there. People have to make up their own minds if they choose to accept that data or not. But the data is there and verifiable.

Holly: I’m curious if you could tell us a little bit about how you got into this topic.

Dane: Yes. It’s not a job I wanted. I’m non-political, I’ve never been an activist. I have a background with Bechtel Power Corporation, a very corrupt corporation that I left at an early age because of issues I was not comfortable with.

My home was on the cover of the world’s largest renewable energy magazine. I’m completely off grid with wind, hydro, and solar power. When I began to lose massive amounts of my solar PV uptake. My photovoltaic power uptake from whatever these aircraft were emitting, not a single natural cloud formation in the sky. Only the lingering, spreading emissions from these aircraft. Losing sixty, seventy, eighty, ninety percent on some days, of my solar power uptake. Unimaginable losses. Something was clearly wrong. This was not condensation.

And as I began to research and found mountains of data on geoengineering, solar radiation management. Researched the primary elements listed in those patents. We have about 160 patents posted at geoengineeringwatch.org. The primary element being aluminum. I began to do precipitation tests, processed at the state certified lab. Found an initial baseline test of 7 ppb aluminum, 7 parts per billion. And I further investigated with a hydrogeologist that stated, given my filtered forested location, that amount was very high. It should be less than 1 ppb. Subsequent tests over the next year, in a single rain event, went as high as 3450 ppb of aluminum. Unimaginably high levels of aluminum and barium. Primary elements in climate engineering patents.

And after finding these government documents, presidential documents, patents, film footage up close, which we have posted at geoengineeringwatch.org. Of aircraft KC-10s, C-17s, KC-135s. Up close footage of them dispersing materials at altitude.

GW 615

Geoengineered skies, Clarksville, Tennessee. Photo credit: Brandy Glick​

Global dimming is at 20 to 30 percent, you may know that. Every single dot connects. And the mountain of materials coming down on us, for example, in California, CARB, California Air Resources Board, has done studies on the materials migrating from China. From coal-fired power plants and so forth. Aluminum not amongst those materials. Nor barium.

Where was it coming from, when elements have escalated that high in that short of time? No other plausible source. I was simply forced to face the fact that these programs were in fact deployed and raining an unimaginable amount of toxicity down, destroying the ozone layer, the list goes on and on. And so, I was simply forced to either turn away or face this issue. And I couldn’t turn away.

Holly: If I recall, a few years ago, some of your work was more about chemtrails. Now it seems it has more of an emphasis on geoengineering, and I’m just wondering if you could talk a little about the evolution there, about the relationship between the two concepts.

Dane: Can you cite any of my work that uses that term?

Holly: No, I’m not talking about now. I’m talking about maybe three to five years ago.

Dane: So am I. I mean, if you can cite any of my work other than to make the point that geoengineering refers to the layman’s term of chemtrails as no scientific basis whatsoever. And I had adamantly always adhered to the science terms. Thus the name of our site, which has always been the name geoengineeringwatch.org. So I would just ask not to be confused with other groups that are using that term. I don’t use it. And adamantly and tenaciously adhere to the climate science terms on this issue.

Holly: Okay. I know you said you’re nonpolitical, but I’m curious if you have any thoughts on what the recent election and the new administration means for geoengineering programs.

Dane: I think it remains to be seen. Certainly we know the new administration is sending out incredibly alarming signals with their appointees and their apparent denial of what is really undeniable. That the climate is changing radically. That anthropogenic causes are creating the damage. We’re putting 100 million tons of CO2 in the atmosphere a day. We’re lopping down the forest, we’re poisoning the oceans. I mean, I can’t truly fathom that anyone could not understand that that would radically disrupt the energy balance of the planet.

You know the military has always known this and we know that right now your listeners can research this. We have the US military stating on the record, the greatest national security threat of all is the disintegrating climate. So, I would argue, why would we think that the military would ask our permission before they would engage in climate engineering when we know, historically, they have been engaging in weather warfare for many, many decades. We know this. Project Popeye in Vietnam. The rain seeding over the Ho Chi Minh Trail. Project Storm Fury, on and on.

So, for the Trump administration to, apparently, at least at this point, deny the climate emergency which we face right now is certainly extremely alarming. That being said, I’m working directly with a retired Air Force Major General. Retired Army Major General. Both of whom are communicating with the Trump administration about climate engineering. Because they want these programs stopped as well. Our only goal is to expose these programs and to bring them to the light of day. And that’s hard to do when you have, Holly, I’m not sure if you know this, are you aware that there is a federal gag order on all National Weather Service and all NOAA employees?

Holly: No, I hadn’t heard that.

Dane: Your listeners might want to examine that. And that should certainly send up a big red flag for them. I first was notified of that from PEER, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. Who works directly with NWS and NOAA employees. I got a no return address, no identity, but I got a copy of the legal action. And there is in fact a federal gag order on all National Weather Service and all NOAA employees right now. We have to ask ourselves, what are they trying to hide?

Holly: I’m curious, in the course of your work, what kinds of people do you meet?

Dane: Well, we’re dealing with a lot of people right now. In fact, the former CEO of the world’s largest environmental and engineering consulting firm communicates with us on our attorney conference calls. Because he also, is very aware of these programs.

The former MP, Canadian MP for British Columbia, I communicate directly with him. In fact, he was just, he’s aware of these programs as well. He’s endorsed a book that we’re about a week away from releasing. And, again, the purpose of that book is simply to disclose the programs and give data to back up that disclosure.

We have also, at geoengineeringwatch.org, visual proof of climate engineering in the form of NASA satellite images and people who would search this on our site and look at these images, you don’t need to know anything about meteorology. If you look at these images, you will be absolutely shocked at what you see. Not just the aerosol operations, but the interaction with radio frequency signals that are used to manipulate the particulates.

I simply would ask people to look at the visual data and if you don’t believe what you see with your own eyes, there’s not much else I could say. But the attempt to engineer our way out of this without reducing carbon emissions, reducing deforestation, reducing ocean contamination. That’s simply a fool’s errand. It’s an extremely counter productive life. Holly, you remember the chemical Corexit that was used in the Gulf of Mexico to mask the severity of the oil spill …

Holly: Yeah.

Dane: Do you remember that?

Holly: Actually, I do.

Dane: I would argue that climate engineering is in that category. Corexit in the Gulf of Mexico, according to environmental impact studies, made that situation 52 times more toxic. But they used it anyway. To hide the problem. Not to make it better, to hide it.

And that’s, in fact, what we see now. The UV levels, we’re seeing from climate engineering, for example, I’m working directly with a 40 year former NASA aeronautics engineer. Forty year veteran. With expensive UV metering equipment that we supplied him. He’s seeing … we’re seeing UVB 1000 percent higher than we’re being told. It’s burning the bark off of trees. The cambium layer. We have [inaudible 00:14:47] huge study of whales with massive UV burns on them. We’re seeing UVC now on the surface. Five percent of incoming UV is now UVC, that’s the last band of UV before x-ray.

Your listeners can search — geoengineering destroys the ozone layer. There’s no question in the scientific community that will be the result. But, that is the result. For those that aren’t willing to admit for reasons I just cited, there’s federal gag orders and so forth, these programs are ongoing. We see yet another confirmation they are ongoing by the massive ozone destruction, the massive UV levels, also not being officially disclosed.

Holly: I’m wondering if you could tell us, what’s your goal or strategy? What do you and other concerned people plan to do about geoengineering?

Dane: Well, I would argue that the interference with Earth’s natural processes is highly destructive overall. Much like a pharmaceutical with the human body. How many pharmaceutical ads do we see now that say take this for this particular ailment and by the way, here’s twenty side effects that are unimaginably worse than what the quote cure is claimed to mitigate.

I would argue that we need to have disclosure on these programs. And when we have the environmental and the green community, for example, justifiably fighting to save forests and to preserve ecosystems through the world. If we have an element in the equation that is so horrifically destructive and not being admitted to, can we really have a legitimate discussion about the environment or the climate unless this issue is disclosed?

And that issue is climate engineering, when we have the world’s most recognized climate engineers, like Dr. David Keith stating on the record his goal, their goal to put 20 million tons of aluminum nano particulates into the atmosphere annually. And not even having studied the toxicological effects.

And that is a fact, that’s on film. If your listeners search “Dane Wigington/David Keith”, they can see me confronting Dr. Keith at an international geoengineering conference where he admits that they have done no study whatsoever on the toxicological environmental effect. So, I would simply argue this, this is the goal of our study; to have full disclosure of this issue. Because we can’t really have any legitimate discussion about the climate or the state of the environment without acknowledging and considering this massive unacknowledged factor of climate engineering.

Holly: Well, I think we’d better wrap up there. But thanks for sharing your perspectives. I appreciate your time.

Dane: Only asking people to investigate. That’s our only goal. We don’t ask anybody to believe anything we state, we’re simply asking them to investigate the data. So thank you for allowing us to do that.

Holly J. Buck biography excerpt:

Faculty Fellow

Holly Jean Buck is a Doctoral candidate in the Department of Development Sociology at Cornell University, where she is also a Research Fellow at the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future.

Her work looks at climate change, energy system transformation, and human-environment interactions in the Anthropocene.  As a NSF-IGERT fellow in Food Systems and Poverty Reduction in East Africa, she looked into potential socio-ecological impacts of large-scale land acquisitions for biofuels; currently, she is interested in the intersection of climate engineering with food systems and land use.

Academic Interests:  Geographies of climate change, energy security, remote sensing with UAVs, appropriate technology and algal biofuels, marine bioprospecting, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, open-source biotechnology, startup culture, Anthropocene pedagogy & writing, the sociology of expectations, future studies

Holly holds a M.Sc. in Human Ecology from Lund University in Sweden, and previously worked in the geospatial industry.

Read More

Climate Engineering, Ozone Destruction, And Radiation Clouds, The Dangers Of Air Travel

January 24, 2017     110 Comments
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Air travel is becoming ever more hazardous to human health for a host of reasons. Not only are air travelers inhaling high concentrations of toxic particulates as they fly through various layers of solar radiation atmospheric haze (contributing to aerotoxic syndrome impacting passengers and crews), radiation clouds at aviation altitudes also pose a dire threat.

334i

Climate engineering and the health dangers of air travel are completely interwoven issues.

A recently published study in a peer-reviewed journal is now acknowledging the radiation clouds and the dangers they present to air travelers. 

Jan. 20, 2017: A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Space Weather reports the discovery of radiation “clouds” at aviation altitudes. When airplanes fly through these clouds, dose rates of cosmic radiation normally absorbed by air travelers can double or more.

“We have flown radiation sensors onboard 264 research flights at altitudes as high as 17.3 km (56,700 ft) from 2013 to 2017,” says Kent Tobiska, lead author of the paper and PI of the NASA-supported program Automated Radiation Measurements for Aerospace Safety (ARMAS). “On at least six occasions, our sensors have recorded surges in ionizing radiation that we interpret as analogous to localized clouds.”

Though there are countless forms of anthropogenic activity negatively affecting the atmosphere and ozone layer (including the ongoing Fukushima disaster), climate engineering aerosol spraying and the accompanying radio frequency/microwave transmissions are a primary factor that is wreaking havoc on the biosphere, the atmosphere, and all of Earth's life support systems.

44j

Though the chart above reflects the official narrative for UV exposure, official sources are not disclosing the off the chart UV radiation levels that now showing up even at ground levels (including UVC). At higher altitudes, much higher concentrations of radiation are present and at far more dangerous UV spectrums.

The full spectrum of electromagnetic radiation is much more extensive than just UV radiation. 

88j

Electromagnetic radiation exposure is a very real danger, what is the full extent of damage being done to Earth's atmosphere from the ongoing climate intervention operations?

The vast majority of air travelers are not even slightly aware of the risks they are taking when they fly.

GeoengineeringWatch.org 223

Ongoing geoengineering/solar radiation management programs have transformed skies all over the globe. Geoengineered skies in Volo, Illinois. Photo credit: Robert Snell

The fact that air travelers absorb radiation is not news.  Researchers have long known that cosmic rays crashing into Earth’s atmosphere create a spray of secondary particles such as neutrons, protons, electrons, X-rays and gamma-rays that penetrate aircraft.  100,000 mile frequent flyers absorb as much radiation as 20 chest X-rays—and even a single flight across the USA can expose a traveler to more radiation than a dental X-ray.

Conventional wisdom says that dose rates should vary smoothly with latitude and longitude and the height of the aircraft.  Any changes as a plane navigates airspace should be gradual.  Tobiska and colleagues have found something quite different, however: Sometimes dose rates skyrocket for no apparent reason.

Most of the human race takes Earth's protective atmosphere for granted, this is a grave mistake.

77g

We are told that the Earth's atmosphere stops most types of electromagnetic radiation from reaching Earth's surface, but current metering and corroborating data greatly disputes this official narrative. (Image credit: STScI/JHU/NASA)

We are all immersed in an increasingly toxic and radiated environment that is rapidly taking its toll on our health and the entire web of life. Of all the dangers we face, the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare is mathematically the most dire and immediate threat we face short of nuclear cataclysm. We will sink or swim together. If the human race is to have any chance of long term survival, a complete course correction of our species must occur in the very near term. Who will join this epic battle to sound the alarm?  Who will stand and make their voice heard for the greater good?
DW 

May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to GeoengineeringWatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.

Read More

An Indisputable Response To Climate Engineering Deniers

January 29, 2015     27 Comments
Share

Source: Activist Post

The Washington Post article of January 22, 2015 titled "How A Group Of Conspiracy Theorists Could Derail The Debate Over Climate Policy" prompted this response to what either the Post’s editors or article author apparently overlooked or did not choose to do, in my journalistic opinion—publish facts!

Over the years, The Washington Post acquired numerous awards for excellent investigative journalism, etc., including the prestigious Pulitzer Prize several times, the last being in 2014. One would imagine—at least this writer’s journalistic opinion—that extensive and accurate research would be the ground floor for factual, open-source, non-pejorative, non-ad hominem reporting and journalism.

When journalist Puneet Kollipara postulates, “Meet the “chemtrails” crowd, who posit that governments, scientists and other institutions are using airplanes’ “chemtrails” — basically contrails that are allegedly laced with chemicals — to alter the climate, create extreme weather, poison people, or even control our minds,” and “In short, chemtrails itself is a conspiracy theory,” someone needs to point out that The Washington Post team should have done their homework more diligently, as there are hundreds of federal government agency reports and, in particular, U.S. Patents of record, for managing weather systems. Many are listed below in the Weather Geoengineering / Chemtrail Database generated by this writer.

However, I think maybe I may be inclined to agree with Kollipara that chemtrails just may be a conspiracy—a real ‘true’ conspiracy to keep what’s going on day and night – and which darkens our skies (less sunlight hits earth now), plus precipitates all kinds of toxic crap falling onto earth—to keep the public from knowing what’s actually going on above our heads.

Read More

Extreme UV Radiation Is Killing Our Trees

January 10, 2015     52 Comments
Share
Trees and whole forests around the globe are in steep decline. So much of the population has completely given up any connection to the natural world and thus they do not notice how rapidly tree health has deteriorated in almost all locations. All over the world formerly healthy forests are now in very poor condition. The condition of the trees has gone from bad to worse and few take note of this, let alone show any concern. The ongoing global climate engineering programs have decimated the ozone layer. Ozone layer destruction has long since been a known and recognized consequence of introducing particulates into the atmosphere. Atmospheric spraying of nano particles is a primary aspect of solar radiation management (SRM). In short, geoengineering is destroying the ozone layer. Levels of UVB are now often up to 1000% higher than official agencies are disclosing, these are extremely dangerous levels. How do we know levels are this high? Because we can and are metering UV radiation. We are now even detecting UVC radiation at the surface, UVC is the last band of UV radiation before x-ray radiation. We are told by all "official" monitoring agencies that UVC is stopped 100,000 feet up in the atmosphere, this is also a lie. Back to the trees, what is all this radiation doing to them? The 2 minute video below illustrates one example of the harm being done.
Read More

Another Day in the Asylum.

June 2, 2014     26 Comments
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

The climate system continues to unravel, and the geoengineers continue to fuel this disintegration. Continued jet stream manipulation has the “climate science” community scratching their heads. Of course they find all sorts of reasons to explain this unraveling that don’t involve the mention of the geoenginering/HAARP elephant in the room, thats TABU.

Read More

Geoengineering is Destroying the Ozone Layer

May 13, 2014     82 Comments
Share

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

So, How Bad Can It Get? Just when it seemed the negative news surrounding global geoengineering could not get any worse, it absolutely can and is.

Read More

Don’t Believe UV Radiation Levels are “Off the Charts”?

August 20, 2013     41 Comments
Share

Massive UV Levels Are Not So Easy To Hide. (Even if the disinfo agents lie about the facts)

Read More

“1984” Has Truly Arrived – NASA Chemtrail Propoganda for Kids

July 12, 2013     19 Comments
Share

I don’t think any glaring lie about the ongoing global geoengineering programs has enraged me so much as the criminal lies contained in the total propaganda site posted below put out by NASA. The attempt to completely brainwash our beautiful children has reached a new pinnacle of criminality.

Read More

Extensive List of PATENTS

August 8, 2012     28 Comments
Share

For anyone doubting the existence of the phenomenon of geoengineering/weather modification, please take a minute to read through this extensive list of patents from America on equipment and processes used in just such programs. The evidence is clear.

United States Patent and Trademark Office

  • 1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists

  • 1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft

  • 1631753 – June 7, 1927 – Electric Heater – Referenced in 3990987

  • 1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs

  • 1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts

  • 1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method

  • 1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment

  • 2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987

  • 2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture

  • 2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator

  • 2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device

  • 2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather

  • 2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes

  • 2591988 – April 8, 1952 – Production of TiO2 Pigments – Referenced in 3899144

  • 2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture

  • 2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator

  • 2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987

  • 2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere

  • 2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device

  • 2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987

  • 2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields

  • 2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds

  • 2986360 – May 30, 1962 – Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device

  • 2963975 – December 13, 1960 – Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet

  • 3126155 – March 24, 1964 – Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator – Referenced in 3990987

  • 3127107 – March 31, 1964 – Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals

  • 3131131 – April 28, 1964 – Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions

  • 3174150 – March 16, 1965 – Self-Focusing Antenna System

  • 3234357 – February 8, 1966 – Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device

  • 3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke

  • 3300721 – January 24, 1967 – Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases

  • 3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus

  • 3338476 – August 29, 1967 – Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers – Referenced in 3990987

  • 3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump

  • 3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker

  • 3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser

  • 3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds

  • 3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System

  • 3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere

  • 3518670 June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud

  • 3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles

  • 3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding

  • 3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas

  • 3587966 – June 28, 1971 – Freezing Nucleation

  • 3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipatation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region

  • 3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions

  • 3608820 – September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein

  • 3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method

  • 3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process

  • USRE29142 – This patent is a reissue of patent US3630950 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

  • 3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material

  • 3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device

  • 3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use

  • 3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere

  • 3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke

  • 3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method

  • 3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System

  • 3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process

  • 3808595 – April 30, 1974 – Chaff Dispensing System

  • 3813875 – June 4, 1974 – Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmospphere

  • 3835059 – September 10, 1974 – Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore

  • 3835293 – September 10, 1974 – Electrical Heating Aparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors

  • 3877642 – April 15, 1975 – Freezing Nucleant

  • 3882393 – May 6, 1975 – Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere

  • 3896993 – July 29, 1975 – Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds

  • 3899129 – August 12, 1975 – Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification

  • 3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation

  • 3940059 – February 24, 1976 – Method For Fog Dispersion

  • 3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator

  • 3990987 – November 9, 1976 – Smoke generator

  • 3992628 – November 16, 1976 – Countermeasure system for laser radiation

  • 3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals

  • 4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes

  • RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Reissue of: 03630950 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols,

  • particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process

  • 4035726 – July 12, 1977 – Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or

  • radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al

  • 4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition

  • 4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials

  • 4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser

  • 4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser

  • 4347284 – August 31, 1982 – White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays

  • 4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure

  • 4402480 – September 6, 1983 – Atmosphere modification satellite

  • 4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids

  • 4415265 – November 15, 1983 – Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy

  • 4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification

  • 4475927 – October 9, 1984 – Bipolar Fog Abatement System

  • 4600147 – July 15, 1986 – Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus

  • 4633714 – January 6, 1987 – Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer

  • 4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions

  • 4653690 – March 31, 1987 – Method of producing cumulus clouds

  • 4684063 – August 4, 1987 – Particulates generation and removal

  • 4686605 – August 11, 1987 – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

  • 4704942 – November 10, 1987 – Charged Aerosol

  • 4712155 – December 8, 1987 – Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma

  • 4744919 – May 17, 1988 – Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer

  • 4766725 – August 30, 1988 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

  • 4829838 – May 16, 1989 – Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas

  • 4836086 – June 6, 1989 – Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog

  • 4873928 – October 17, 1989 – Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation

  • 4948257 – August 14, 1990 – Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing

  •  1338343– August 14, 1990 – Process and Apparatus for the production of intense artificial Fog

  • 4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth

  • 5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming

  • 5005355 – April 9, 1991 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

  • 5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface

  • 5041760 – August 20, 1991 – Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration

  • 5041834 – August 20, 1991 – Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted

  • 5056357 – October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium

  • 5059909 – October 22, 1991 – Determination of particle size and electrical charge

  • 5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft

  • 5110502 – May 5, 1992 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

  • 5156802 – October 20, 1992 – Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics

  • 5174498 – December 29, 1992 – Cloud Seeding

  • 5148173 – September 15, 1992 – Millimeter wave screening cloud and method

  • 5245290 – September 14, 1993 – Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect

  • 5286979 – February 15, 1994 – Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin

  • 5296910 – March 22, 1994 – Method and apparatus for particle analysis

  • 5327222 – July 5, 1994 – Displacement information detecting apparatus

  • 5357865 – October 25, 1994 – Method of cloud seeding

  • 5360162 – November 1, 1994 – Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water

  • 5383024 – January 17, 1995 – Optical wet steam monitor

  • 5425413 – June 20, 1995 – Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality

  • 5434667 – July 18, 1995 – Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering

  • 5441200 – August 15, 1995 – Tropical cyclone disruption

  • 5486900 – January 23, 1996 – Measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device

  • 5556029 – September 17, 1996 – Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)

  • 5628455 – May 13, 1997 – Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog

  • 5631414 – May 20, 1997 – Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state

  • 5639441 – June 17, 1997 – Methods for fine particle formation

  • 5762298 – June 9, 1998 – Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather

  • 5912396 – June 15, 1999 – System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions

  • 5922976 – July 13, 1999 – Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector

  • 5949001 – September 7, 1999 – Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis

  • 5984239 – November 16, 1999 – Weather modification by artificial satellite

  • 6025402 – February 15, 2000 – Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a

  • detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin

  • 6030506 – February 29, 2000 – Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species

  • 6034073 – March 7, 2000 – Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity

  • 6045089 – April 4, 2000 – Solar-powered airplane

  • 6056203 – May 2, 2000 – Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds

  • 6110590 – August 29, 2000 – Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same

  • 6263744 – July 24, 2001 – Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector

  • 6281972 – August 28, 2001 – Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution

  • 6315213 – November 13, 2001 – Method of modifying weather

  • 6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

  • 6408704 – June 25, 2002 – Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus

  • 6412416 – July 2, 2002 – Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method

  • 6520425 – February 18, 2003 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers

  • 6539812 – April 1, 2003 – System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound

  • 6553849 – April 29, 2003 – Electrodynamic particle size analyzer

  • 6569393 – May 27, 2003 – Method and device for cleaning the atmosphere

Read More